Times of Israel, on Iran, 26 October 2026

The Times of Israel, carrying Reuters copy, calls Hezbollah a 'terror group' in its own voice with no source attached and describes the thousands of Lebanese dead as 'operatives' on nobody's word. It also writes Israel's account as plain fact, calling the territory its forces hold inside Lebanon a 'security zone' and the continuing strikes hits on 'Hezbollah targets', while Hezbollah's answers are 'claimed' and Israel's military declined to comment.

7.3

Serious

out of 10

What we found

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Serious

    “The Iran-backed Hezbollah terror group”

    What the words do
    Puts the label 'terror group' into the outlet's own narration in the article's opening line, with no source attached to it.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That 'terror group' is a neutral description the reporting establishes, rather than one party's designation.
    What is actually the case
    Nothing in the article attributes the label to anyone. The same article is careful to source its factual claims to 'two Lebanese security sources' and to Israeli or US officials, but attaches the label to nobody.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“two Lebanese security sources told Reuters”

    Show it in the article

    “thousands of its operatives and many of its leaders killed”

    What the words do
    Describes the people Israel killed in Lebanon as 'operatives' in the outlet's own voice.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That every one of the thousands of dead was a fighter, and that this has been established.
    What is actually the case
    No source is given for the composition of the dead. The article's own later sentence puts the toll of the Israeli offensive at more than 4,000 people, 'mostly members of Hezbollah's Shiite Muslim constituency', which is a description of a community, not of fighters.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“mostly members of Hezbollah’s Shiite Muslim constituency”

    Show it in the article

    “the terror group nevertheless remains committed to attacking Israel”

    What the words do
    Repeats the unsourced label in the outlet's voice at the point where the article turns to Hezbollah's intentions, binding the label to an assertion about what the group wants.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the outlet itself has established both the designation and the intent.
    What is actually the case
    The sourcing in this sentence covers the rearming activity, not the label; no source is given for 'terror group' anywhere in the piece.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Israel’s military declined to comment”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Hezbollah, which Israel and the United States designate a terrorist organisation, has spent three months preparing for a possible resumption of hostilities, Lebanese security sources say. Israel's two offensives since 2024 killed thousands of its fighters and many of its leaders, according to those sources.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “Israel currently maintains a security zone in southern Lebanon”

    What the words do
    States Israel's name for the territory it holds inside Lebanon, 'security zone', in the outlet's own voice with no attribution.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the strip of Lebanese land under Israeli military control is properly described as a security zone, and that this description is uncontested.
    What is actually the case
    The article's own preceding sentence says Israeli forces control villages in southern Lebanon, which is occupation of another state's territory; the word 'occupied' appears nowhere. Hezbollah's reply in the article turns on 'Israel's presence on Lebanese territory'.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Israeli forces now control its heartland of villages in southern Lebanon”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Israel’s presence on Lebanese territory”

    Show it in the article

    “IDF troops are dismantling Hezbollah infrastructure”

    What the words do
    Writes the Israeli military's account of what its troops are doing inside Lebanon as the outlet's own factual statement, and uses 'IDF' unattributed.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the demolition work in southern Lebanese villages has been verified as being confined to Hezbollah infrastructure.
    What is actually the case
    Israel's military declined to comment to Reuters for this article, and no independent source for what is being demolished is given. The next sentence shows the same content being attributed, 'Israel says', when it suits the article.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Israel’s military declined to comment”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Israel says the zone is intended”

    Show it in the article

    “Israel has continued to strike Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon”

    What the words do
    Characterises everything Israeli occupation forces have hit during the ceasefire as 'Hezbollah targets' in the outlet's own voice.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the continuing strikes have hit only Hezbollah and have caused no civilian harm worth reporting.
    What is actually the case
    No source is given for what the continuing strikes hit, and the article reports no casualty figures for them at all, while the Israeli military declined to comment to Reuters.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Israel’s military declined to comment”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli forces hold a strip of occupied territory in southern Lebanon, from which Israel has ordered civilians out and where, Israel says, its troops are destroying Hezbollah infrastructure.

  3. Hides who did it

    Minor

    “civilians have been ordered to evacuate”

    What the words do
    Puts the expulsion of Lebanese civilians from their villages in the passive, with no actor in the sentence.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the civilians left under some unspecified instruction, with no one in particular responsible.
    What is actually the case
    The same sentence and the one before it show Israeli forces control these villages and maintain the zone, so the article's own reporting identifies who issued the order; the words 'Israel ordered' never appear.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Israeli forces now control its heartland of villages”

    Show it in the article

  4. Tells the event as something else

    Minor

    “triggering an Israeli offensive”

    What the words do
    Makes Hezbollah's opening of fire the trigger for an Israeli offensive that the same sentence says killed more than 4,000 people and uprooted a quarter of Lebanon's population.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the killing of more than 4,000 people in Lebanon was set off by Hezbollah.
    What is actually the case
    The article's own previous sentence dates the sequence from US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February, and says Hezbollah fired 'in support of Iran'. The article uses no equivalent causal framing for the strikes on Iran.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“following US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February”

    Show it in the article

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Hezbollah rearming for possible renewed conflict with Israel ...

Hezbollah rearming for possible renewed conflict with Israel, Lebanese sources say

Iran-backed terror group reportedly receives fresh cash from Tehran, rebuilds drone and explosives capabilities; claims right to ‘resistance’ against Israel

BEIRUT, Lebanon (Reuters) — has spent three months preparing for a possible resumption of hostilities with Israel, after receiving an infusion of cash from Iran, according to Lebanese security personnel briefed on its activities.

The group, founded by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards in 1982, has been dealt severe blows in two wars with Israel since 2024, with , and much of its arsenal destroyed.

Israeli forces now control its heartland of villages in southern Lebanon, and political pressure has mounted in Beirut for its disarmament.

, where and . Israel says the zone is intended to prevent Hezbollah from reestablishing itself near the border and threatening communities in northern Israel.

But and has used a lull in hostilities since June to rearm, with a focus on procuring explosives and producing drones that can be flown into Israeli positions, two Lebanese security sources told Reuters.

One of the sources, and another close to Hezbollah, said the group had received tens of millions of dollars from Iran to help boost its military capabilities. That is in addition to around $200 million that the group received from Tehran to aid displaced families in its Shiite heartlands, which Reuters reported earlier this month.

Hezbollah has been restoring command-and-control structures that broke down in key battles, according to one of those sources and three other security officials familiar with the group’s operations.

In response to questions from Reuters, Hezbollah’s media office claimed Israel’s presence on Lebanese territory gave it a legitimate right to any resistance. It rejected the suggestion that its command-and-control systems had broken down.

Israel’s military declined to comment. Iran’s permanent mission to the United Nations in Geneva did not immediately respond to Reuters questions.

A US State Department spokesman said Washington would keep strangling Hezbollah’s finances through sanctions and other measures. A US Treasury spokesperson said Iran was running out of money and ways to move money.

Hezbollah on alert

Hezbollah’s effort comes amid continued tensions in the wider regional conflict following US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February.

Hezbollah opened fire in support of Iran on March 2, that killed more than 4,000 people and uprooted a quarter of Lebanon’s population, mostly members of Hezbollah’s Shiite Muslim constituency.

Hostilities largely abated over the summer as an interim Iran-US deal included a Lebanon ceasefire and Washington mediated talks between Lebanon and Israel. Full-scale hostilities have not resumed in Lebanon despite the collapse of the US-Iranian deal, though .

Hezbollah is on alert for a possible US-Iran escalation, potentially reigniting the Lebanon front.

The sources told Reuters the group had not yet managed to fully prepare its stockpiles or fighting force.

Hezbollah is still restocking, acknowledging this month that explosives seized by Lebanese authorities belonged to it and were intended for use against Israel. A Hezbollah official and a Lebanese security source told Reuters they were specifically for its explosive drones.

Israel’s remote warfare proved a challenge, sources say

The group will also need to repair command-and-control capabilities after losses on key fronts, including the flashpoint town of Bint Jbeil and the strategic Ali al-Taher ridge, according to one of the Lebanese sources and three security officials.

They said Hezbollah’s tactic of operating in small units and rationing the use of anti-tank rockets left some units isolated on those fronts, struggling to confront Israel’s remotely operated systems including weaponized drones and armed remote-controlled vehicles.

The Israeli military told Reuters it uses remotely operated systems to monitor southern Lebanon and reduce troops’ threat exposure.

Hezbollah has not explicitly said whether it would take part in the eruption of fresh hostilities, but its media office said it was wary of giving Israeli leaders any justification to escalate in Lebanon, particularly as the group was concerned about its constituents being displaced once more.

The Times of Israel contributed to this report.

The Times of Israel Community.

Read the original article on timesofisrael.com (opens in a new tab)

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Times of Israel

Everything we scored from Times of Israel

See how 13 outlets covered this story