i24News, on UK Politics, 4 October 2026

8.2out of 10Serious

UK Green Party backs ‘Zionism is racism’ motion, supports single Palestinian state

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

The Green Party of England and Wales passed a motion declaring 'Zionism is Racism' at its party conference on Sunday. The motion also includes Green Party support for a single democratic Palestinian state "with equal rights for all." The motion passed by 1,022 votes to 813, while an amendment aimed at protecting Jewish party members from expulsion if they belong to self-identified "Zionist" synagogues failed to pass, with 1,026 votes against and 684 in favor.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never quotes the motion's own text, which says it is aimed at the ideology of Zionism and not at the religious or ethnic background of those who identify as Zionists. It also never reports the motion's caveat that anti-Zionism should not be equated with antisemitism. Without this, and next to the claim that the motion pushes for Israel's destruction, a reader believes the motion targets Jewish people.

How we know

The motion also faced serious opposition from the party's leadership, with four out of the party's five MPs opposing the motion , who wanted to block the motion from . Green Party MP Adrian Ramsay said that endorsing a single Palestinian state did not match Green commitments to self-determination. Some party members are planning to challenge the motion in court under equality laws with lawyer Adam Wagner telling The Guardian that such a case would have a good chance of succeeding.

Wagner went on to say that it was possible that, under the Equality Act 2010, a broad definition of Zionism was a protected belief and that attempts to discriminate or harass others for that belief would "create an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive environment for Jewish people and Zionists." Despite the motion's passage, its actual effect remains to be seen because because under the Green Party's internal rules, member-supported motions become official party policy, but will not necessarily be included in the party's manifesto at the next general election.

The Green Party of England and Wales has become the center of anti-Zionist politics in the UK over the past few years, beginning before October 7, but accelerating after. Many anti-Zionists left the UK Labour Party under Keir Starmer because they felt he was too soft on Israel, and moved to the Green Party. Under current leader Zack Polanski, .

Israel's Foreign Ministry condemned the Green Party saying, ". The Greens have officially and its ideological doctrine calling for the destruction of the State of Israel through armed struggle." The Foreign Ministry called on all UK parties to dsiavow the party's motion. UK terrorist plot or mistaken arrest?

Suggested articles Former Lebanese minister blames 'Zionists' for Quran burnings in Europe | i24NEWS Neturei Karta cause political storm over visit to Jenin | Batya Levinthal U.S. opens probe into allegations of antisemitism at California university | i24NEWS

Read the original article on i24news.tv (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

i24News states in its own voice that the Green Party motion pushes for the destruction of Israel, and wrongly lists leader Zack Polanski among its opponents. It never quotes the motion's own wording that it targets an ideology, not Jewish people. It ends on the Israeli Foreign Ministry calling the party a "pro-terror entity" with no Green response.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “pushing for the destruction of Israel”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice i24News says the motion is "pushing for the destruction of Israel", with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as an established fact that the Green Party voted to destroy Israel.
    The context
    The article itself reports that the motion backs a single democratic state with equal rights for all. The phrase "destruction of the State of Israel" comes from the Israeli Foreign Ministry's statement, which the article quotes later. The motion says it is aimed at an ideology, not at people's religious or ethnic background.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Makes a false claim

    Serious

    “as well as the party's leader, Zack Polanski”

    Why this matters
    i24News lists the party leader, Zack Polanski, among the motion's opponents.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the whole leadership, including Polanski, stood against the motion.
    The context
    The Independent names the four MPs who publicly rejected the motion, and Polanski is not among them. Jewish leaders criticised the leadership for failing to oppose it. The New York Post reports Polanski was not present for the vote.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Four of the party's five MPs, Ellie Chowns, Sian Berry, Adrian Ramsay and Carla Denyer, publicly rejected the motion; the leader, Zack Polanski, was not present for the vote.

  3. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “the UK Green Party ceased to function as a political party and transformed into a pro-terror entity”

    Why this matters
    i24News closes its report on the Israeli Foreign Ministry calling a UK political party a "pro-terror entity", and sets nothing against it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader leaves with a government's charge of terror support against a parliamentary party as the final, unanswered word.
    The context
    The Green Party issued a statement on the vote calling itself an anti-racist party opposed to the illegal occupation. The article never quotes any Green spokesperson.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “adopted Hamas’s signature green color”

    Why this matters
    The quote ties the party to Hamas through the colour green, and i24News lets it stand with no comment.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is invited to see the Green Party's name and colour as a sign of alignment with Hamas.
    The context
    Nothing in the article supports any tie between the Green Party and Hamas. The Green Party's response is absent.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israel's Foreign Ministry called the party a "pro-terror entity". A Green Party spokesperson said the party is anti-racist and has opposed the illegal occupation of Palestinian land.

  4. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “the party has emphasized its anti-Zionist credentials over its traditional environmental focus”

    Why this matters
    i24News states as its own verdict that the party now puts anti-Zionism above the environment.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as fact that the Greens have abandoned their environmental priorities.
    The context
    The article gives no source, figure or example for this claim.

    Show it in the article

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never quotes the motion's own text, which says it is aimed at the ideology of Zionism and not at the religious or ethnic background of those who identify as Zionists. It also never reports the motion's caveat that anti-Zionism should not be equated with antisemitism. Without this, and next to the claim that the motion pushes for Israel's destruction, a reader believes the motion targets Jewish people.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from i24News

Everything we scored from i24News