Evening Standard, on UK Politics, 25 October 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Met to scale back action on minor tag breaches amid police officer shortages

No framing issues found.

The Metropolitan Police is scaling back enforcement against some offenders who breach the conditions of their electronic tags, as pressures on officers continue to mount across London. Under a pilot scheme running until the spring, Scotland Yard will not routinely take action over curfew breaches or tag battery failures lasting less than an hour, unless the offender is judged to pose a particular risk to the public. The change comes as the Met faces increasing demands linked to the Government's early prisoner release programme, which has seen more offenders monitored in the community under licence conditions.

Police will continue to review all breach notifications, but cases will only be escalated towards possible arrest where there are safeguarding concerns, a heightened risk to the public or evidence of persistent offending. High-risk offenders, including domestic abusers, will continue to be prioritised. The Met says the move is designed to free up officers to focus on the most serious cases and is expected to cut the number of breaches requiring police action by more than 15 per cent.

Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has previously voiced concerns about the pressures created by early prisoner release. The force says officers are dealing with more than 100 tag breaches every day and are arresting two or three recalled prisoners each week following further alleged offending. The strain on resources was highlighted during a recent operation in south London, where officers were tracking offenders wanted for breaching licence or tag conditions.

One police sergeant told Sky News there were "not enough cops" to manage the growing workload. Police sources say some breaches have innocent explanations, such as offenders attending hospital in an emergency, while delays in reporting can mean officers are alerted many hours after a breach occurs. The Government defended its wider approach, saying it inherited a prison system "on the brink of collapse" and that failing to act would have created serious risks across the criminal justice system.

Ministers insisted public safety remained the priority, pointing to expanded electronic tagging, tougher licence conditions and increased investment in policing and probation services. A Met spokesperson said the force was looking at whether alternative consequences could be used in lower-level cases, allowing officers to focus their efforts where they have the greatest impact. "Where offenders have briefly stepped outside for a cigarette, or police are notified 19 hours later that they were 15 minutes late returning home, tying up several officers for hours is not the best use of resources," the spokesperson said.

The trial will test whether a more targeted, risk-based approach can ease pressure on London's overstretched police force without compromising public safety. A Government spokesman said: “We inherited a prison system on the brink of collapse. “If we had failed to act, the police would have been forced to halt arrests, putting communities at untold risk. “We will never jeopardise public safety. That is why we are putting thousands more neighbourhood police officers onto our streets, upping police funding to £18.5 billion and taking investment in the probation service to record levels.

“To manage offenders out on licence, we are rolling out the toughest-ever controls, including world-first restriction zones, the largest expansion of electronic tagging, and giving victims a say in licence conditions.”

Read the original article on standard.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The Evening Standard reports a Metropolitan Police pilot under which officers will not routinely act on curfew or tag battery breaches lasting under an hour, except where an offender poses a risk. It ties the change to pressure from early prisoner release and gives both the Met's and the Government's positions. Its claims are attributed to the people who made them, and nothing in it misleads.

What it gets right

  • “The Met says the move is designed to free up officers to focus on the most serious cases”

    The Standard credits the purpose and the expected 15 per cent cut to the Met. It does not state the force's own account of its motive as fact.

  • “unless the offender is judged to pose a particular risk to the public”

    The Standard sets out the exact limits of the pilot, including the exception for risky offenders. A reader does not come away thinking all breaches will be ignored, which is the picture C4 gives with "officers would ignore".

  • “The Government defended its wider approach, saying it inherited a prison system "on the brink of collapse"”

    The Standard attributes the Government's account of the prison crisis to the Government and puts its words in quotation marks. It does not adopt them in its own voice.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Evening Standard

Everything we scored from Evening Standard