Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding
We do not republish articles from BBC News. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
BBC News reports on Heanor's ban on face coverings worn to intimidate, with police, council and resident views. It says plainly how few fines have been issued and what its figures cover. Its one weakness is small: it answers whether the ban made a difference with a fall in anti-social behaviour reports taken from February alone in each of three years.
Uses figures that mislead
Minor
“and in February this year 15 reports were logged”
Why this matters
The BBC answers its own question about whether the ban made a difference with one month's figure from each of three years.
The impression it gives
A reader may take the drop from 46 to 15 as a trend that shows the ban working.
The context
Single months are a narrow base for a trend, and the article itself says the figures include crimes outside the order and that police have no exact figures for incidents dealt with under it.
How we know
Elsewhere in the article“including crimes which do not fall under the PSPO regulations”
Elsewhere in the article“there were no exact figures for incidents dealt within the PSPO area”
What it gets right
“although to date, no fines have been handed out in Nottingham”
It tells the reader plainly that the headline-making ban has produced no fines, instead of letting the national attention imply enforcement.
“but not coverings worn for religious or cultural purposes”
It states the religious and cultural exemption, so readers do not wrongly link the ban to people who cover their faces for faith.
“I think it gets a lot of press that it's getting worse but I'm not sure that it is”
It includes a resident who questions whether the problem is growing, giving a counterweight to the claims of rising trouble.