The Guardian, on Climate, 26 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

US forces accused of ‘weaponising’ Somalia’s floods by trapping women and children in the path of El Niño

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

T he water was rising rapidly. It had already reached Cayni Ali’s waist. Her home, five metres from the flooded River Juba in southern Somalia , never stood a chance. There was nowhere to go. Ali’s city of Jilib was under attack. Repeated airstrikes, said the mother of six, were pinning its population beside the rising river. “The drones come all the time,” said the 27-year-old. “We hear them constantly. They kill animals, civilians. The town is big but destruction is everywhere.”

View image in fullscreen Cayni Ali with her child Mandeq at a health centre in Kismayo, Somalia. Photograph: Hugh Kinsella Cunningham Asho Omar from Malenda, a village near Jilib, described “constant” airstrikes that had forced people towards the banks of the Juba. “The airstrikes are everywhere; it is difficult to move. So many people have been killed.” Their testimony offers a rare glimpse of life inside the stronghold of al-Shabaab , the Islamist militants who control 30% of Somalia.

Closed off from the outside world, residents describe a city dealing with significant civilian casualties. Bodies, some said, lay in the streets. The ongoing conflict is a legally ambiguous, shadowy war coordinated by the United States in east Africa , in which there is little accountability for harm to Somali civilians. The United States Africa Command (Africom) would not share “operational security” details of a seemingly accelerating campaign that has also raised questions over potential covert US strikes.

But there is, perhaps, an even darker dimension to the offensive on al-Shabaab’s de facto capital . Sources say the military strategy appears to be seeking to drown those living in al-Shabaab territory by “weaponising” a rapidly strengthening El Niño , forecast to intensify Somalia’s rainy season from this month. View image in fullscreen An aerial view of the Juba River, close to the town of Kismayo. Photograph: Hugh Kinsella Cunningham “The airstrikes are forcing people to go close to the river.

It’s an extremely aggressive offensive, exploiting El Niño as a weapon of war to push the population into flood-prone areas,” said a source monitoring the Juba floodplain in southern Somalia. Pinning the population – which includes large numbers of women and children – on the river’s floodplain has raised concerns of large-scale deaths in the months ahead. “The official line is that they are targeting military positions and al-Shabaab, but because al-Shabaab is embedded within the community, it’s difficult to avoid collateral damage,” added the source.

When El Niño last struck Somalia in 2023, , displacing more than 1.2 million people . Analysts have questioned the ethics of the US military allegedly using mapping data from flood-prone areas – conceived to mitigate civilian casualties – to inflict harm. Jethro Norman, a senior researcher with the Danish Institute for International Studies , said: “A weaponisation of El Niño is a reversal of process – using humanitarian remote sensing to inflict casualties rather than to mitigate harm.

You capture the cumulative impact of a sustained airstrikes campaign in an El Niño flooding context.” View image in fullscreen The aftermath of the 2023 El Niño in Luuq district, Jubaland, which caused the worst floods ever seen in the country. Photograph: Feisal Omar/Reuters US officials deny exploiting climatic factors. A spokesperson said: “Africom does not target civilians, conduct operations for the purpose of displacing civilian populations or use weather or flooding as a method of warfare.

Africom targets lawful military objectives and takes feasible measures to mitigate civilian harm.” Nevertheless, , offering a catastrophic drowning event blamed on a supercharged El Niño . L ike many cities, Jilib’s location has been . On a low-lying plain, the city is chronically vulnerable to flooding.

In 2023, vast swathes of farmland were submerged. Halimo Abdikadir from Kamsuuma, south of Jillib, described the destruction of her home, 6 miles (10km) from the river. “The waters came quickly at night – when they left, everything was mud. A lot of animals drowned.” Arbey Famu from Ahmed Yare, another village outside Jilib, expects this El Niño to be far worse than 2023 : her crops of maize and sorghum are underwater. “In Jilib, there is big flooding already,” said the 70-year-old.

US defence officials will know the early indicators of El Niño’s impact in al-Shabaab’s heartland. UN agencies say the Juba River basin is of “particular concern”. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) , meanwhile, foresees “severe flooding”. View image in fullscreen Arbey Abdi Famu, a resident of the Dalhiska displacement camp in Kismayo. Photograph: Hugh Kinsella Cunningham Attacking Jilib using ground forces carries much risk.

Airstrikes can yield triumphs such as the death of a senior al-Shabaab commander on 1 October, but are unable to overrun a city of 100,000. Ali Adan Ali, the commissioner for displaced people in Jubaland , is worried. In his Kismayo office, Ali identified 327 regions prone to flooding. By October, El Niño warnings had only been issued to half. His chief concern is the lack of boats. Without them, he says, thousands in al-Shabaab territory risk being trapped on the east side of the river, unable to reach help in Kismayo, at the mouth of the Juba.

View image in fullscreen People on the streets of Kismayo, where long-term drought and USAID cuts have brought misery. Photograph: Hugh Kinsella Cunningham Three years ago, during the last El Niño, Ali says, 19,000 people were stranded for a week without food. “We are running out of time,” he says. The absence of boats sums up Somalia’s funding woes. In 2023, the country’s aid budget was $2.2bn. Now it stands at about $300,000. Flood protection investment has dwindled.

Compounding concerns is al-Shabaab’s lack of preparedness in the area it controls. Ali has not received a response from the militants regarding El Niño readiness. Cayni Ali said there are no sandbags or flood defences deployed yet in Jilib. Earth walls were erected along the river but have proved insufficient. “They are not big enough,” she said. The latest flood advisory for the River Juba urges communities to “reinforce” weak riverbanks.

C orroborating testimonies describe a prolonged – and seemingly indiscriminate – campaign of airstrikes against al-Shabaab that appears to have killed many civilians. The US would not share details of potential civilian fatalities “to protect US and partner forces and preserve operational security”. Farhan Ahmed, who lived in Jilib until fleeing last month, described constant terror. “There were airstrikes every day, all the time.” One strike flattened five homes in his neighbourhood.

Ahmed, 35, described bodies littering the city streets. Fadumo Abdi claimed the airstrikes were largely failing to target militants. “The attacks are mostly killing civilians. Some were buried, but some were not,” she said. Abdikadir, from Kamsuuma, added: “The drone attacks on Jilib are too much. So many people die.” Yusuf Siidi, 27, from Araare near Jamame in al-Shabaab territory, witnessed three teenagers killed in one strike. Maryan Salah was at home near Jamame when a drone sent a shard of burning metal 20cm long into her back yard, landing next to her two-year-old daughter.

“ It was so close. I am very angry. I’m not part of the conflict.” Salah’s near miss predates the current offensive. She can recall only that it happened in “mid-March”. The US admits a drone strike near Jamame on 19 March, but no other data is provided. View image in fullscreen A mother takes her baby to a Somalia Red Crescent Society health centre in Kismayo to check for symptoms of malnutrition. Photograph: Hugh Kinsella Cunningham Although eyewitness accounts detail an extraordinary number of strikes in Jilib, official US records confirm only one airstrike in Jilib during August.

Six took place last month. Between the start of August and now, the US says it conducted a total of just 11 strikes. Allegations of ambiguity increasingly characterise US operations in Somalia. It is an opaque approach that raises questions over whether Africom has authorised covert airstrikes in the region. Records from the nearest hospital indicate intensive airstrikes or fighting. The ICRC has treated 205 patients with “weapon-related” injuries in Kismayo this year, a 43% increase on last year.

David Sterman, analyst at the New America thinktank, said: “The possibility that we are seeing covert US strikes always looms large when there are strikes without clear attribution.” View image in fullscreen A malnourished three-month-old baby in Kismayo hospital’s intensive-care ward in September. Photograph: Hugh Kinsella Cunningham The US, however, said it publicised “all airstrikes conducted under its authority in Somalia. We do not maintain an undisclosed or unannounced strike count.”

Turkey has also used drones to target al-Shabaab in Somalia. Operating alongside Africom, Turkey rarely divulges any details of its strikes or military operations in Somalia. Beyond airstrikes and floods, the primary concern for Somalis is hunger . Those fleeing the Juba valley – local authorities are offering humanitarian help to those who escape – say there is insufficient food to sustain them. Omar’s family of 13 survives on one fish a day.

How big is the fish? Omar held her hands less than 30cm apart. Habiba Ali, 55, from Jamame, said her family – like many – shares one daily meal of maize. Time in between is spent hiding from conflict. “When the fighting stops, we wait for it start again.” In Kismayo, too, long-term drought and USAID cuts have brought misery. Shukri Ahmed, 32, the president of Galbeed refugee camp, estimates that 6,000 might have died in Kismayo’s network of displacement sites since the Trump administration abruptly shut USAID last year.

Overnight, two children had died in makeshift shelters from diarrhoea. El Niño will “deepen [Somalia’s] hunger levels”, warns the UN-backed body responsible for identifying famine. Zakaria Mohammed, head nurse at Kismayo’s ICRC-supported hospital for five years, says children from al-Shabaab territory arrive every day so severely malnourished or weak they cannot be saved. Cases of child malnutrition rates have risen 40% this year. Xaawo Nacdoor made it just in time.

Al-Shabaab had blocked her leaving Jamame to receive treatment for her baby. But her 14-month-old daughter Faadumo was dying, so Nacdoor fled at night. View image in fullscreen Fadumo Abdi with her 14-month-old baby, Maryan, in the infant intensive-care unit in Kismayo hospital. Photograph: Hugh Kinsella Cunningham For three days, with just a bottle of water, Nacdoor walked with her daughter strapped to her back. On the second day, the toddler lost consciousness.

“She was severely dehydrated, but I kept going.” Arriving at the hospital, Faadumo weighed 4.1kg. Three days later: 4.4kg. She survived. Most patients here vow never to return home, saying life under al-Shabaab meant no school, education, healthcare or food. For the thousands of families straddling the Juba River – often the poorest – things are about to get much worse. Explore more on these topics Global development Somalia Africa Middle East and north Africa El Niño southern oscillation Internally displaced people Flooding features Share Reuse this content

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Guardian reports allegations from residents and an anonymous source that US air strikes are pinning Somalis on the Juba floodplain ahead of El Niño floods, and it gives Africom's denial. It blames the floods on El Niño and a vague "era of extreme weather" but never tells the reader that human-caused warming makes heavy rainfall and floods like these worse. After the denial it also puts an unattributed "many wonder" insinuation of deliberate drowning in its own voice.

  1. Leaves out the climate link

    Serious

    “found wanting in an era of extreme weather”

    Why this matters
    The words "an era of extreme weather" are the article's only nod to why floods are getting worse, and they name no cause.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the extreme weather battering Jilib as a fact of the times with no known driver.
    The context
    Human-caused warming has made heavy rainfall and floods more frequent and more severe. The article never says so, and no word for warming or climate change appears anywhere in it.

    How we know

    • On the recordThat warming has made hot extremes, heavy rainfall, agricultural and ecological drought, fire weather and intense tropical cyclones more frequent or more severe.ipcc.ch (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “warming” and “climate change”.

    Show it in the article

    “it caused the worst floods seen in the country for a century”

    Why this matters
    The sentence puts the 2023 record floods down to El Niño alone.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes century-scale flooding in Somalia is purely the work of a natural weather cycle.
    The context
    El Niño now acts on a warmer planet, and warming has made heavy rainfall more intense. The article leaves that out, even when it later calls this El Niño "supercharged" without saying what supercharges it.

    How we know

    • On the recordThat warming has made hot extremes, heavy rainfall, agricultural and ecological drought, fire weather and intense tropical cyclones more frequent or more severe.ipcc.ch (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“blamed on a supercharged El Niño”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    When El Niño last struck Somalia in 2023, it caused the worst floods seen in the country for a century; global heating is making heavy rainfall and floods like these more frequent and more severe.

  2. Unattributed insinuation in the outlet's voice

    Minor

    “many wonder if the opportunity to weaken al-Shabaab using the weather was too tempting to ignore”

    Why this matters
    "Many wonder" puts a grave suspicion of deliberate mass drowning in the Guardian's own voice. It credits the suspicion to no named person, and it comes straight after Africom's denial.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking a wide body of informed opinion suspects the US of planning a drowning event.
    The context
    In the article the weaponisation claim rests on unnamed sources and one anonymous monitor. The named analyst speaks only of what such a weaponisation would mean, and Africom denies it outright.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“said a source monitoring the Juba floodplain”
    • Elsewhere in the article“use weather or flooding as a method of warfare”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

  1. 27 OctMelting glaciers in Dolomites reveal cache of first world war munitions0.0
  2. 27 OctSuper-rich get ‘double dividend’ from causes and costs of climate crisis, report finds0.0
  3. 26 OctSouthern California prepares for flooding amid forecast of ‘record-breaking tides’6.0
  4. 26 OctUK looking to give carmakers incentives to turn EVs into ‘power plants on wheels’0.0
  5. 25 OctUS south-west braces for more storms after enduring days of rain and flooding6.0

Everything we scored from The Guardian