Press TV, on Iran, 6 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

News

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

The 13th of Aban on the Iranian calendar, which usually coincides with November 4th, occupies a special place in Iran's contemporary history. Known in Iran as the “National Day of Struggle Against Global Arrogance”, the date brings together three defining moments that shape the country's political destiny and its relationship with foreign powers. Although these events took place in different years, and under different circumstances, they share a common theme: the Iranian people’s struggle for independence and resistance to foreign interference.

The first event was the exile of Ayatollah Seyed Ruhollah Khomeini to Turkey in 1964, following his fierce opposition to the Shah's capitulation bill. Fourteen years later, on November 4th, 1978, dozens of students were killed when the Shah's security forces opened fire on demonstrators at Tehran University. A year after that, revolutionary students took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, an event that became one of the most consequential episodes in the history of Iran-U.S. relations.

Three events, separated by years but connected by a common historical narrative, have made the 13th of Aban, or November 4th, a lasting symbol of resistance in Iran. This article is based on an episode of the Press TV show, Iran Today, featuring Mr. Yaghoub Tavakkoli, an Iranian historian; Mr. Seyed Hamid Rouhani, an Iranian historian and a companion of Imam Khomeini; and Mr. Amir Maki, Iranian historian & author. November 4th, 1964, marked a decisive moment in the confrontation between Imam Khomeini and the Pahlavi monarchy.

After publicly denouncing the legislation that granted American citizens sweeping judicial immunity in Iran, Imam Khomeini was forcibly sent into exile. His opposition wasn't simply directed at a controversial legal provision; it challenged a political order that placed foreign interests above Iran's national sovereignty. The legislation that triggered Imam Khomeini's historic protest was commonly known as the Capitulation Bill. Under its provisions, American military personnel and certain other American nationals in Iran would enjoy judicial immunity, meaning that they could not be prosecuted under Iranian law for a range of offenses.

The practice of capitulation was deeply rooted in the history of colonial domination. Foreign powers had frequently imposed such privileges on weaker countries, effectively placing their own nationals beyond the reach of local judicial authorities. In Iran, these privileges had a long history; they were initially granted to Russian nationals under the Treaty of Turkmenchay during the Qajar era. Other foreign powers subsequently secured similar concessions, taking advantage of the political and economic weakness of the Qajar monarchy.

Yaghoub Tavakkoli, who has written extensively on the contemporary history of Iran, details how Imam Khomeini's exile on November 4, 1964, impacted his fight against the Pahlavi regime and his status among the political and religious circles at the time. “Imam Khomeini recognized from the outset the common ground between dictatorship and colonialism. This became more evident during the capitulation issue.” “The most humiliating aspect of capitulation was that a defeated government had to grant the victorious power consular jurisdiction over its own nationals.”

“Following the Treaty of Turkmenchay, Iran had been subjected to this arrangement, first with Russia and later with Britain and other European powers.” “The constitutional revolution eventually abolished capitulation in Iran.” The capitulation system was eventually abolished in 1927, following growing public opposition and changes in the international political climate after World War I. Yet decades later, the Pahlavi regime moved to restore similar privileges.

On October 5, 1963, the cabinet of Prime Minister Asadollah Alam, acting on the Shah's instructions, approved an American proposal granting judicial immunity to U.S. citizens in Iran. When the news reached Imam Khomeini, he strongly condemned the decision. On October 26, 1964, he delivered a historic speech in which he challenged the legitimacy of the legislation and accused the regime of humiliating the Iranian nation. In one of the most powerful passages of his address, Imam Khomeini declared that the regime had openly supported a disgraceful measure that placed the Iranian people beneath American dogs.

Seyed Hamid Rouhani, who saw in person the Islamic revolution as it was unfolding, describes the political context in which the capitulation law was enforced upon the Iranian nation, and how Imam Khomeini's objection became a turning point in his fight against the Pahlavi regime. “The Americans wanted immunity from prosecution in Iran through capitulation, and they imposed this injustice on the Iranian nation.” “When Imam Khomeini heard about it, he could not tolerate any foreign power exercising dominance over Iran.

He delivered a speech in simple language that everyone could understand, explaining what capitulation meant.” “He said that if the Shah of Iran ran over an American dog, he would be held accountable. But an Iranian soldier had no right to hold an American accountable.” The Shah's regime had already spent two years trying to contain Imam Khomeini's growing opposition. His uncompromising position on capitulation, however, left the regime with little room for maneuver.

On November 4, 1964, security forces arrested him and sent him into exile in Turkey. Tavakkoli adds that “The Americans played a direct role in Imam Khomeini's exile. Documents recovered from the U.S. Embassy, known as the U.S. Den of Espionage, clearly demonstrate this.” “The U.S. Embassy's charge d'affaires at the time even said that they had exiled the man who was obstructing American policies.” “He was referring to Imam Khomeini.” “The Turkish government, which cooperated with the Iranian government, also agreed to host Imam Khomeini in exile for one year.”

What the monarchy intended as a means of silencing a prominent opponent instead became another chapter in the growing struggle against foreign influence and political dependence. Imam Khomeini's exile would ultimately become an important milestone on the road to the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Tavakkoli recounts that “Imam Khomeini was arrested for exile in a completely sudden operation. Military forces arrived in the middle of the night in military vehicles, took him directly to the airport and did not allow him to remain in Iran.”

“Following his exile, Pahlavi regime forces were deployed at strategic points across the cities to prevent a repeat of the June 5, 1963 uprising.” Fourteen years later after Imam Khomeini's exile, November 4 witnessed another bloody confrontation between the Pahlavi regime and its opponents. In 1978, as protests against the monarchy spread across the country, security forces opened fire on demonstrators at Tehran University. Fifty-six students lost their lives while hundreds were wounded.

The killings intensified public anger and further weakened a monarchy already facing a nationwide revolutionary movement. By the autumn of 1978, opposition to Mohammad Reza Shah had reached an unprecedented level. Demonstrations and strikes were spreading throughout Iran while the regime's attempts to restore order were becoming increasingly ineffective. The thirteenth of Aban in the Iranian calendar, which falls on November 4, has also been called as the pupil day in Iran, which Tavakkoli clarifies thus: “Following the suppression of the September 8, 1978 uprising and a massacre of people in Tehran by the Pahlavi regime forces, Iran entered a period of silence.

People were stunned and uncertain about what would happen next.” “About a month later, in early autumn, student demonstrations began across Iran. Schools were shut down and students went on strike.” “Once students joined the Islamic revolution, the number of people joining street demonstrations surged dramatically.” On November 4, schools were closed as protests continued across Tehran. Large numbers of school students joined the demonstrations and headed towards Tehran University where university students and other protesters had gathered to voice their opposition to the Shah.

The situation quickly deteriorated. Around midday, security forces fired tear gas into the crowd in an attempt to disperse the demonstrators, but, instead of retreating, the protesters continued their chants and demonstrations. The confrontation then took a deadly turn. Police forces opened fire on the crowd, killing 56 students and leaving hundreds of others injured. The incident sent shockwaves across the country. The deaths of young students, many of whom had taken to the streets demanding political change, became another powerful symbol of .

Amir Maki clarifies that “November 4, which is commemorated as ‘Students' Day’, emerged from protests against American imperialism and Washington's direct interference in Iran under the Pahlavi regime.” “On November 4, 1979, following a crucial call by Imam Khomeini for students, university academics, seminary students and others to take part in the anti-imperialist movement, students took over the U.S. embassy, which became known as the U.S. Den of Espionage.”

Imam Khomeini responded with a message addressed to the students and the Iranian people. He urged them to remain steadfast, expressing confidence that victory was approaching and that their demands for freedom and independence would eventually be heard around the world. The bloodshed of November 4, 1978, further intensified the revolutionary atmosphere. Rather than intimidating the opposition, the regime's violent response deepened public resentment and accelerated the process that would bring the Shah's rule to an end only a few months later.

The anniversary of this tragedy is now observed in Iran as Student Day, commemorating the young people who lost their lives in the struggle against the Pahlavi monarchy. November 4, 1979 brought Iran and the United States into one of the most dramatic confrontations in their modern history. Revolutionary students took over the US Embassy in Tehran, accusing it of serving as a center for espionage and interference in Iran's domestic affairs.

Their action was fueled by Washington's decision to allow the ousted Shah to enter the United States, a move that revived deep-seated fears of another American attempt to influence Iran's political future. Seyed Hamid Rouhani explains that “The students who planned to take over the US den of espionage were familiar with Imam Khomeini, his political line, his objectives, and his approach.” “They had realized the danger it (the embassy) posed to Iran and understood the plots being hatched against the country's independence.”

Motivations for the US embassy takeover According to Rouhani, “The students who followed Imam Khomeini's line had also clearly identified the enemy.” “They knew that the Americans were using their embassy to carry out conspiracies.” “So the students acted immediately, and Imam Khomeini endorsed their action, calling it the second revolution.” “The first revolution had been against the Shah's dictatorial regime; the second was against the United States.”

The takeover of the embassy in Tehran quickly attracted international attention. On November 4th, 1979, revolutionary students occupied the compound, demanding the extradition of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who had been allowed into the United States. They viewed the embassy as a symbol of Washington's long-standing interference in Iran, and renamed it the US Spy Den. Amir Maki recalls that “When the documents recovered from the U.S. den of espionage were made public, everyone saw that .”

“How could an embassy have more than 2,500 employees? How could anyone accept that decisions on even the smallest aspects of Iran's infrastructure and governance, including cultural, security, and economic affairs, were being made there and then dictated directly to the Shah?” “Nearly 11,000 pages of documents recovered from the U.S. den of espionage in 1979 were put into written records. As a researcher, I strongly believe every Iranian should read at least one page of these documents.”

“They revealed direct American interference in every area of Iran's governance, from minor decisions to major ones.” “This was not the work of a normal embassy, Embassies have entirely different functions.” Their accusations were rooted in a history of American intervention, particularly the 1953 coup against Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh. After Mossadegh moved to nationalize Iran's oil industry, challenging British and American interests, the CIA and Britain's MI6 organized Operation Ajax to overthrow his government and strengthen the Shah's position.

Maki is adamant that “The important point about the takeover of the U.S. den of espionage was that there were clear signs of conspiracies and interference coming

Read the original article on presstv.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Press TV tells the history behind 13 Aban: Khomeini's 1964 exile, the 1978 shooting of students at Tehran University and the 1979 embassy takeover. It names the police as the killers in 1978. In its own narration it states a motive for the Pahlavi state's violence as fact, and it gives every account of the embassy takeover to historians who share the students' view.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “the violence employed by the Pahlavi regime to maintain its grip on power”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice Press TV says the Pahlavi state used violence 'to maintain its grip on power', stating a government's motive as settled fact.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes the purpose behind the shootings as established, not as the outlet's reading of events.
    The context
    The article documents the act: police opened fire and killed 56 students. It offers no source for why the order was given. The motive is the outlet's inference, not a reported fact.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Police forces opened fire on the crowd, killing 56 students”

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “it had not really been an embassy, it was exactly what Imam Khomeini had called it, a U.S. spy den”

    Why this matters
    Press TV gives the account of the embassy takeover only to three historians who share the takeover's view of the embassy.
    The impression it gives
    The reader hears only one account of what the embassy was and why it was seized.
    The context
    The article quotes no US or independent voice on the embassy's role or the takeover. The United States appears only as the subject of the historians' accusations.

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Police forces opened fire on the crowd, killing 56 students and leaving hundreds of others injured”

    It names who fired and uses the word killing, giving the toll with its actor in the active voice.

  • “the CIA and Britain's MI6 organized Operation Ajax to overthrow his government”

    It names the agencies behind the 1953 coup in the active voice.

  • “This article is based on an episode of the Press TV show, Iran Today”

    It tells the reader plainly where the historians' accounts come from.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 6 NovIran3.0
  2. 6 NovIran6.0
  3. 6 NovIran3.0
  4. 6 NovRezaei’s Moscow meeting part of Iran’s preparations for ‘geographically unrestricted’ war: Analyst3.0
  5. 6 NovIran6.0

Everything we scored from Press TV