Daily Star, on UK Politics, 27 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Andy Burnham's £12k savers rule 'confirmed' as Brits warned of £450k 'trap'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Brits looking to buy a home are being warned to watch out for a £450,000 "trap" . The PM's decision to cut under 65s tax-free ISA allowance from £20,000 to £12,000 already looked likely to hit first time buyers, and now experts have pointed out that when they actually try and purchase a property. According to the current rules, home buyers using a lifetime ISA (LISA) to contribute to buying a home do not have to pay a withdrawal charge on this amount.

This means that they can use all of their savings plus the maximum government contribution of £4000 towards buying a property. However, some experts are warning that the system has a fatal flaw. Currently, the government only waives the 25% withdrawal charge on the LISA if the money is being used on a property that costs less than £450,000. This means that, if a house costs more than that, buyers could end up out of pocket. For example, if a LISA holder has saved £16,000 and received the maximum of £4000, that total sum of £20,000 would be subject to the 25% withdrawal fee.

In other words, the buyer would see £5000 go up in smoke and be left with a grand less than they originally saved. In other words, buyers could be left worse off that if they hadn't tried to save money using a LISA in the first place. And considering the average house price in London is already over £450,000, this 'trap' is more than just a hypothetical. Graham Nicoll, Financial Planner, Chartered FCSI at NCL Wealth Partners , called on the government to "scrap the cap", adding that we should not be "penalising buyers because of where they live or what they earn".

He said: "He commented: "The Government should be helping first-time buyers onto the property ladder, not pulling it away from under their feet with an arbitrary £450,000 cap and punitive 25% withdrawal charge. If the money buys their first home, the penalty should not apply! “My son is a great example of why LISAs work. The government bonus has given him a laser focus on maximising contributions, encouraging him to save more himself. He hopes to buy his first home next year.

That's exactly what the scheme should achieve. "I’d caution anyone potentially buying above the cap against further contributions and instead use a normal ISA or general investment account. It's too early to judge the proposed First Time Buyer ISA, but it mustn't repeat the same mistake."

Read the original article on dailystar.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Daily Star ties a long-standing Lifetime ISA rule to Andy Burnham's ISA cut. Its opening says Brits face a £450,000 'trap' after his decision and blames 'the new rules', while its own body says the £450,000 cap and 25% charge are part of the current rules.

  1. Makes a false claim

    Serious

    “after Andy Burnham slashed the cash-free ISA limit”

    Why this matters
    The words "after Andy Burnham slashed" place the £450,000 'trap' as a result of Burnham's ISA cut.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Burnham's decision created the £450,000 trap for home buyers.
    The context
    The article's own body describes the £450,000 cap and the 25% charge as the current Lifetime ISA rules, which exist apart from the cut to the general ISA allowance.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Currently, the government only waives the 25% withdrawal charge”
    • Elsewhere in the article“According to the current rules”

    Show it in the article

    “the new rules could also allow people to fall into a worrying financial trap”

    Why this matters
    The Star says in its own voice that "the new rules" open the trap, adding a second harm on top of the cut hitting first-time buyers.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the trap is a fresh consequence of the Prime Minister's new ISA rules.
    The context
    The trap the article goes on to describe is the existing £450,000 cap on Lifetime ISA withdrawals. The article's own expert attacks that cap, not the new allowance.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“an arbitrary £450,000 cap and punitive 25% withdrawal charge”
    • Elsewhere in the article“if the money is being used on a property that costs less than £450,000”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The government is cutting the tax-free ISA allowance for under-65s from £20,000 to £12,000. Separately, a financial planner warns that existing Lifetime ISA rules charge a 25% penalty on homes costing more than £450,000.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Star

  1. 28 OctUK shops running out of household items thanks to stockpiling sparked by Government WW3 fears6.0
  2. 28 OctAndy Burnham's Government scraps standing charges on gas to save Brits £108-a-year6.0
  3. 27 OctLiz Truss finally has her say on the lettuce and it's exactly what you'd expect3.0
  4. 27 OctWW3 conscription fears in UK as one group to be 'mobilised' before young Brits6.0
  5. 27 OctLiz Truss' 100 page book shows her knack for being terrible for a very short time3.0

Everything we scored from Daily Star