Al Jazeera English, on West Bank, 2 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Displaced in Hebron: Picking up pieces after Israeli siege

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Hebron, occupied West Bank – Nour al-Natsha knew there was a chance his home wouldn’t be in the best condition upon his return after 10 days of displacement. Israeli forces had taken over Hebron’s al-Jalada neighbourhood on October 24, a day after Palestinian gunmen killed two Israeli soldiers nearby. Al-Natsha’s family were given 20 minutes to leave, taking only their money, gold and important documents, and leaving behind most of their clothes, everyday belongings and family photographs.

Recommended Stories list of 3 items list 1 of 3 Jordan’s King Abdullah promises to confront ‘terrorists’ after Karak attack list 2 of 3 Anthrax outbreak kills hippos in DR Congo’s Virunga National Park list 3 of 3 Hebron governor says Israeli forces withdraw from city after 10-day siege end of list After hearing that Israeli forces had withdrawn , al-Natsha tentatively returned to check on the house on Monday. He found the doors wide open, and the house turned upside down.

Belongings were missing, as well as his young daughter’s pet bird. “When we entered the house, it was a mixture of emotions,” the 35-year-old orthopaedic surgeon said. “You couldn’t tell whether you were happy to be back home or heartbroken by what had happened to it.” The Israeli military operation in Hebron appears to be over – but al-Natsha and his family, and thousands of others in the city, are left to pick up the pieces. The Israeli military forced Palestinian residents out of al-Jalada after an October 23 attack that killed two Israeli soldiers [Mosab Shawer/Al Jazeera] Anxious return Al-Natsha explained that families and neighbours had gathered on Sunday evening in the nearby Wadi al-Karm area, close to their homes, waiting until around midnight after reports emerged that the military operation had ended.

But seeing no signs of a withdrawal, they returned to their temporary accommodation, despite holding on to the hope of going home soon. Advertisement Then, in the early hours of the morning, it was confirmed that the military had withdrawn. Al-Natsha decided to head towards the neighbourhood at around 6am. There, he found several neighbours making their way home and waited for relatives to arrive before entering the area and inspecting their houses.

Al-Natsha was initially accompanied by his father and two brothers as they inspected the property, looking for suspicious objects or potential hazards after finding the doors open. Once they were satisfied that the house was safe, family members began cleaning and putting things back in order, removing belongings they feared might have been damaged or contaminated, in an effort to make the house habitable again and resume their daily lives.

But the family’s return was not without anxiety, particularly for al-Natsha’s four-year-old daughter, Ilya. Her biggest concern was the fate of her pet bird, “Natosh”, which she had left inside the house when the family was forced to leave. Al-Natsha has no idea where the bird is, whether it is dead, or whether the Israeli soldiers released it. Ilya, meanwhile, keeps asking about her pet. Nour al-Natsha and his family have been restoring their home after Israeli forces withdrew from his neighbourhood in Hebron [Mosab Shawer/Al Jazeera] ‘Our paradise on Earth’ The return of families to al-Jalada came after 10 days of in Hebron.

During the operation, hundreds of families were forced to leave their homes, while shops and institutions in the areas were closed. According to previously released figures from the Hebron Governorate’s Support and Relief Committee, 537 families, comprising approximately 3,300 people, were displaced. With residents now returning, the extent of the damage to homes and belongings, and the lasting effects of the days spent away, remain part of the experience of families trying to rebuild their lives.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article describes damage and debris but never says that Israeli forces seized Palestinian homes in al-Jalada and converted them into military posts, or that 15 homes and other structures were demolished during the operation, according to the Hebron Governorate. Without this, a reader may take the damage as incidental disorder rather than the result of homes being occupied and destroyed.

How we know

For 68-year-old Khaled Shawer, who also lives in the neighbourhood, the damage to homes and the debris and destruction left behind by the military operation could be dealt with. What mattered most was that residents had returned and could begin to regain a sense of stability. “Everything can be replaced: the destruction, the damage, the dirt, everything,” Shawer said. “But the most important thing is that we have returned to our homes, our paradise on Earth, the place where we find our psychological and physical stability.”

Read the original article on aljazeera.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Al Jazeera tells the return of displaced families to Hebron's al-Jalada neighbourhood through named residents, and it names Israeli forces as the ones who forced them out. In one passage the outlet softens this forced removal into "evacuations", and it leaves out that Israeli forces seized homes as military posts and demolished 15 homes and other structures. Neither gap changes the overall picture the article gives.

  1. Uses the occupation's words

    Minor

    “military restrictions and evacuations affecting several neighbourhoods”

    Why this matters
    The outlet uses "evacuations" in its own voice for families removed from their homes at gunpoint. The word suggests a protective or orderly measure.
    The impression it gives
    A reader of this sentence alone could think residents were moved out for their own safety.
    The context
    The article itself says families were forced out with 20 minutes' notice and that the military forced residents out. Elsewhere it uses the plain word, so the damage is limited to this passage.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“hundreds of families were forced to leave their homes”
    • Elsewhere in the article“The Israeli military forced Palestinian residents out of al-Jalada”

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article describes damage and debris but never says that Israeli forces seized Palestinian homes in al-Jalada and converted them into military posts, or that 15 homes and other structures were demolished during the operation, according to the Hebron Governorate. Without this, a reader may take the damage as incidental disorder rather than the result of homes being occupied and destroyed.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “The Israeli military forced Palestinian residents out of al-Jalada”

    It names who removed the residents and says plainly that they were forced out.

  • “Al-Natsha’s family were given 20 minutes to leave”

    It gives the concrete detail of how the family was expelled instead of leaving it abstract.

  • “Hebron, occupied West Bank”

    It gives the territory its correct legal status in the outlet's own voice.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al Jazeera English

  1. 2 NovHebron governor says Israeli forces withdraw from city after 10-day siege3.0
  2. 1 NovHebron siege continues for 10th day as Israel threatens wider offensive3.0
  3. 1 NovIsrael’s war on homes: From Hebron to Gaza and southern Lebanon0.0
  4. 30 OctIsrael demolishes homes of Palestinians blamed for attack on soldiers0.0
  5. 30 OctHow Israel choked off Hebron at 10 entrances, as 5,000 forced to flee3.0

Everything we scored from Al Jazeera English