Daily Mirror, on Iran, 15 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Donald Trump weighs up using 'mother of all bombs' against Iran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

The US is considering pulling out the biggest non-nuclear bomb it has — dubbed the "mother of all bombs" — to use against Iran , it is reported. Donald Trump is said to be weighing up his options to set up his war with Iran around the all-important US midterm elections. The US military is said to have drawn up new plans which include using the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast Bomb (MOAB), nicknamed the "mother of all bombs", for the first time in this conflict with Tehran.

This could happen if Trump decides to reignite combat operations against Iran, as the war becomes one of the main talking points in the US ahead of the elections. To see more of the stories you love from The Mirror and to find them easily in Google then make us your preferred source. Free and easy-to-do, just click on the link here to find more from The Mirror at the top of your feed. The President has reportedly called on the military to create several new strike option plans against Iran with a potential targets including "a lot of energy infrastructure", a source told CNN .

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

The article says Trump is weighing his options around the midterms and could reignite combat, but never says he has promised not to attack Iran before the 3 November midterms. The Mirror reported that promise two days earlier, and the New York Post carried it the same day. Without it a reader believes new strikes could come at any moment before the elections.

How we know

Another part of these apparent plans is the use of the "mother of all bombs". The grandiose nickname came after former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein described the Gulf War as "the mother of all battles" in January 1991. A second source, speaking to CNN, claimed some military plans on targeting Iranian nuclear sites, including the Pickaxe Mountain, specifically mentioned using the MOAB. This GPS-guided bomb has the capacity to destroy buildings, people and systems in a 900m radius of an explosive blast.

The huge weapon is 9m long and weighs a 9,800kg — equivalent to four small cars. It carries around 8,500kg of explosives and is designed to explode a few metres about the ground. The MOAB, when it detonates, send out deadly waves of fire and can blast away buildings and even cave openings. Some military sources however have questioned whether the MOAB would be effective in Trump's war as are often located underground.

A source, according to CNN, said: "The MOAB is a massive information operation type weapon that is great for huge area clearance but not much else. It is definitely not designed as a deep penetration warhead." This comes after reports claimed Iran has threatened to launch ground invasions of neighbouring countries allied to the US if Trump continues the conflict. Iranian officials reportedly fortified military and nuclear sites along its borders with several nations that have backed Trump .

Iran has also reportedly and is threatening to widen the ongoing conflict amid the upcoming US midterm elections. Tehran has told regional officials that it would respond to any new attacks by hitting neighbouring US allies in retaliation, according to the Wall Street Journal . Iran shares borders with both the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia , which have both been staunch supporters of the US. Other neighbouring countries include Afghanistan , Iraq, Pakistan, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar and Turkmenistan.

Read the original article on mirror.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The Daily Mirror's headline turns reported contingency plans into a settled fact that the US plans new strikes, dropping the attribution and the conditional its own body gives. The article leaves out Trump's promise, which the Mirror itself reported two days earlier, not to attack before the midterms. It also drops its own earlier reporting that the US and Israel launched the war, calls Iran's government a 'regime' in its own voice, and treats Iran's nuclear facilities as military sites.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “as US plans new strikes”

    Why this matters
    The words "as US plans new strikes" state in the outlet's voice, with no attribution, that the US is planning new strikes.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the US has decided on a new round of strikes on Iran and is preparing to carry them out.
    The context
    The body says only that the military "is said to" have drawn up option plans that could be used "if Trump decides to reignite combat operations". Other coverage says there is no sign Trump has approved the MOAB or ordered new strikes.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“if Trump decides to reignite combat operations against Iran”
    • Elsewhere in the article“is said to have drawn up new plans”
    • Arutz Sheva / Israel National News reported“there has been no indication that Trump has approved the use of the MOAB or ordered a new round of strikes”US considering using MOAB on Iran (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The US military has reportedly drawn up option plans, including possible use of the 'mother of all bombs', should Trump decide to resume strikes on Iran.

  2. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    “since the war started back in February”

    Why this matters
    The words "the war started" give the war no starter at all.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is not told who launched the war, and Israel's part in it disappears from the article.
    The context
    Two days earlier the Mirror reported the same passage as "since the US and Israel launched the war with Iran back in February".

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “rallied regime loyalists”

    Why this matters
    The Mirror calls Iran's government a "regime" in its own narration, with no one's words attached.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes on a verdict on Iran's government as a neutral description.
    The context
    Nothing in the article supports the label. A plain report would say the Iranian government rallied its supporters.

    Show it in the article

  4. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “Iran's nuclear facilities and other military sites”

    Why this matters
    The word "other" files Iran's nuclear facilities under military sites in the outlet's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that Iran's nuclear programme is military.
    The context
    That is a contested claim. Other coverage of the same plans reports that Tehran says its programme is peaceful, and the article gives no Iranian account at all.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  5. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says Trump is weighing his options around the midterms and could reignite combat, but never says he has promised not to attack Iran before the 3 November midterms. The Mirror reported that promise two days earlier, and the New York Post carried it the same day. Without it a reader believes new strikes could come at any moment before the elections.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mirror

  1. 22 OctUS troops and diplomats evacuated from Middle East as Trump 'considers major strikes'3.0
  2. 20 OctTwo men re-arrested on suspicion of assisting Iran after RAF Fairford 'terror plot'6.0
  3. 19 OctIran threatens 'world's internet' in terrifying 'reminder to the enemy'3.0
  4. 17 OctOil tanker carrying 2 million barrels hit in Strait of Hormuz as IRGC issues warning3.0
  5. 17 OctMine sinks cargo ship in Strait of Hormuz leaving hundreds of new iPhones floating 6.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mirror