Daily Mail, on Climate, 23 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

over Rosebank oil field as Harriet Harman says ministers must sign off the North Sea drilling project

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Labour 's splits over North Sea oil and gas have deepened after party grandee Harriet Harman called on ministers to approve the Rosebank field. Baroness Harman, a former deputy leader of the party, urged the Government to green light the largest untapped oil field in the North Sea. A decision on Rosebank, which lies west of Shetland, is still pending despite the Government having approved the Jackdaw gas field this week. The decision to back Jackdaw has been sharply criticised by some Labour MPs and environmentalists who want to accelerate Britain's shift away from fossil fuels .

There is likely to be an even bigger row within Labour's ranks if Rosebank is approved, as the oil field is predicted to produce many more tons of carbon emissions – if it is also given the go-ahead – than Jackdaw. Former energy secretary Ed Miliband previously claimed approval of Rosebank would amount to 'climate vandalism'. But Baroness Harman – who is the Government's special envoy for women and girls – urged ministers to 'make the green argument' for supporting Rosebank.

She said the proceeds from oil production could be used to 'turbocharge' the UK's switch to renewable energy sources. Labour's splits over North Sea oil and gas have deepened after party grandee Harriet Harman called on ministers to approve the Rosebank field Baroness Harman, a former deputy Labour leader, urged the Government to give the go-ahead to the largest untapped oil field in the North Sea Asked whether ministers are likely to approve Rosebank, Baroness Harman told a Sky News podcast : 'Well, my guess is they will approve it. 'I think they should approve it, and I think they should strongly make the green argument for doing it by investing the proceeds into turbocharging our homegrown renewable energy.'

Alongside its approval of Jackdaw, the Government announced the creation of a new energy wealth fund this week. Tax revenues from North Sea oil and gas will be funnelled into the fund, backed with an initial £2billion, which will be used to invest in renewable and low carbon projects. Baroness Harman said the creation of the fund 'points to where we might go with Rosebank'. She added: 'They're saying some of the benefits of doing this... some of the money streams are going to go into a fund which is going to help us with our race to do more investment so that we can get to Net Zero by 2050.'

The Labour peer claimed there would be a 'really strong green argument' for Rosebank if it produces 'a great load of money to be invested into renewables'. Miatta Fahnbulleh, who replaced Mr Miliband as Energy Secretary in July, yesterday insisted she will make the final decision over whether to approve Rosebank and not the Prime Minister. She addressed reports that suggested Andy Burnham or his Chancellor John Healey would ultimately say yes or no to a scheme that could secure thousands of jobs. 'Ultimately only I can make that decision,' Ms Fahnbulleh said.

It has been reported that the Energy Secretary is leaning towards rejecting the project but a spokesman for her Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said this was 'speculation'.

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Daily Mail reports Harriet Harman's call for ministers to approve Rosebank and the split this exposes in Labour. It attributes the main claims, says what the critics want and notes Rosebank's larger emissions. It inflates the split into a 'civil war' in the headline, when the body describes only deepening disagreement.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Labour civil war”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls the disagreement a 'civil war' in the Mail's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader expects Labour to be in open, all-out conflict over Rosebank.
    The context
    The body describes splits that have deepened, with a peer giving her view on a podcast and some MPs criticising the Jackdaw decision. Nothing in the article describes anything close to a war inside the party.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Labour 's splits over North Sea oil and gas have deepened”
    • Elsewhere in the article“sharply criticised by some Labour MPs and environmentalists”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “the oil field is predicted to produce many more tons of carbon emissions”

    It tells the reader what approval would cost the climate, so the case for Rosebank does not appear as pure benefit.

  • “environmentalists who want to accelerate Britain's shift away from fossil fuels”

    It says what the critics want instead of only naming them as opponents.

  • “Former energy secretary Ed Miliband previously claimed approval of Rosebank would amount to 'climate vandalism'”

    It places a challenge to the 'green argument' for drilling before Harman's claim, so her view does not stand unchecked.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 24 OctMAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: A victory for common sense in the battle with eco-zealots0.0
  2. 24 OctLORD ASHCROFT: Britons are split into five 'tribes' on climate change but many agree on one thing... why do our best if the others keep polluting?3.0
  3. 24 OctAndy Burnham and John Healey set to defy eco-zealot Ed Miliband by giving Rosebank oil field green light3.0
  4. 24 OctEnergy firm not backing down over North Sea threat despite Jackdaw green light3.0
  5. 23 OctSuper El Niño then and now: NASA releases satellite photos from 1997, 2015 and 2026 to show just how powerful this year's climate event is shaping up to be0.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail