The Irish Times, on UK Politics, 9 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Children’s author among 28 Irish arrested as part of UK ‘terror’ crackdown on Palestine Action

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

One of Ireland’s leading children’s authors is among 28 Irish people who have been arrested under anti-terror laws in the UK over alleged links to Palestine Action. London-based Chris Haughton, the Irish children’s book author and illustrator and national children’s laureate for 2026 to 2029, was among more than 4,000 arrests, including over two dozen Irish people, linked to Palestine Action in the UK. New figures show that, as of the year ending June 2026, 31 terror-related arrests in the UK were for people that define their nationality as Irish, 28 of which were linked to Palestine Action.

This was more than any other nationality outside of Britain in the year ending June 2026. The UK supreme court began hearing a challenge to the proscription of Palestine Action on Wednesday, November 4th. [ ‘It’s absurd’: Palestine Action UK arrests higher than those at peak of the Troubles Opens in new window ] Proscribing Palestine Action criminalised support, the invitation of support, or membership for the group. A High Court judicial review had previously found the ban was unlawful in February but this was overturned by the Court of Appeal in June.

Under the legislation to date more than 4,000 arrests, the majority for expressing support for the group, have resulted in thousands awaiting trial and potential prison sentences. Arrest figures are continually rising given the regularity of Palestine Action protests where mass arrests take place for sign-holding. A further two dozen protesters were arrested outside the supreme court on Wednesday. “There’s 4,000 of us that have been arrested now,” Haughton, who was arrested for holding a sign declaring support for Palestine Action, told The Irish Times.

“It’s absurd.” Houghton has pledged to donate proceeds from his children’s books to Sally Rooney , the Irish author who recently had her books removed from sale in the UK over her own commitment to donate their proceeds to Palestine Action . Palestine Action was originally proscribed as a terror group on July 5th, 2025, primarily after a series of “direct action” incidents by the group that allegedly involved vandalism of Israeli-owned Elbit Systems drones factories in the UK .

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says the ban followed incidents at Elbit factories. It never mentions the break-in at RAF Brize Norton, where two members spray-painted a refuelling jet, which other reports name as the act that preceded proscription. Without it, a reader believes the ban was only about Elbit sites.

How we know

, activists destroyed drones and computers, causing an estimated £1 million (€1.2 million) in damage to the Filton Elbit Systems factory before clashing with security and police, with one officer behind struck with a sledgehammer, fracturing their spine. Elbit Systems UK Limited has denied that it supplies weapons or military equipment to the Israel Defence Forces or the Israeli ministry of defence. The International Association of Genocide Scholars has stated that Israel’s actions in Gaza amount to genocide .

South Africa launched proceedings against Israel before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 2023, alleging that Israel’s military actions in Gaza constituted a genocide against the Palestinian people, but a ruling is not expected for years. Jonathan Hall, an independent barrister who was appointed by the Home Secretary as the UK’s fourth Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, told The Irish Times it was the “first time” property damage was used as the primary basis for proscription.

Arguing against its proscription as a terror group in the supreme court on Wednesday, Raza Husain, a lawyer for the group, stated, “Palestine Action never advocated for violence against the person.” He told the court on Wednesday that , and only because they involved property damage. Alan Greene, a professor of constitutional law and human rights at the University of Birmingham, said proscribing Palestine Action as a terror group primarily based on property damage presents a marked change in the interpretation of UK terror legislation, when criminal law for incidents of vandalism could have sufficed.

“This is a classic example of counterproductive counterterrorism,” he said. “It has actually increased the prominence of Palestine Action.”

Read the original article on irishtimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Irish Times reports that a leading Irish children's author is among 28 Irish people arrested over Palestine Action, and it sets out the legal challenge to the ban with named sources. It dates the Filton factory attack to August 2025, after the July 2025 proscription it is meant to explain, which other coverage of the case contradicts. It also leaves out the Brize Norton break-in that preceded the ban and gives the government's case in court no space.

  1. Makes a false claim

    Serious

    “In one incident in August 2025”

    Why this matters
    The article dates the Filton Elbit factory attack to August 2025. It offers this as an example of the incidents it says in S13 led to the ban on July 5th, 2025.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is told the ban followed these incidents, then reads that the main example came a month after the ban. The reader is left with a broken chronology or the belief that the Filton attack took place under proscription.
    The context
    The Observer reports that proscription came after members had already been arrested under terrorism laws over the Filton action. That places Filton before the ban, not in August 2025. The article's own S13 says the group was proscribed on July 5th, 2025, so its date for Filton cannot be squared with its own account.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Before the ban, in an earlier attack on the Elbit Systems factory at Filton, activists destroyed drones and computers, and a police officer was struck with a sledgehammer and suffered a fractured spine.

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “only three of its 385 actions over five years met the legal definition of terrorism”

    Why this matters
    The article reports Palestine Action's lawyer's arguments in the supreme court. It then closes on an academic critic of the ban and never gives the Home Office's case in the same hearing.
    The impression it gives
    A reader sees only one side of the supreme court hearing and may believe the case against the ban went unanswered.
    The context
    The Observer reports that the Home Office case rested on a manual urging members to act against Elbit 'without restraint' and on 'escalatory' actions. Observers also said the judges seemed sceptical of Palestine Action's case. None of this appears in the article.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says the ban followed incidents at Elbit factories. It never mentions the break-in at RAF Brize Norton, where two members spray-painted a refuelling jet, which other reports name as the act that preceded proscription. Without it, a reader believes the ban was only about Elbit sites.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Irish Times

  1. 9 Nov‘It’s absurd’: Palestine Action UK arrests higher than those at peak of the Troubles3.0
  2. 8 NovThe Irish Times view on the proposed UK/EU deal: a welcome first step0.0
  3. 8 NovUK wasted more than €100m on zombie Brexit border inspection posts0.0
  4. 8 NovMicheál Martin lays wreath at Enniskillen commemoration 40 years after IRA bombing0.0
  5. 7 NovDeath announced of John Kelly, tireless campaigner for Bloody Sunday victims0.0

Everything we scored from The Irish Times