The Guardian, on UK Politics, 11 November 2026
We do not republish articles from The Guardian. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)The Guardian reports the pensions minister Torsten Bell's claim that a Conservative government would have to raise the state pension age above 70 to keep the triple lock. It attributes the claim to him in the headline and throughout the body, gives the Conservatives' stated position, and sets out the figures Bell relies on with their source. Nothing in it misleads the reader; Bell's argument gets most of the space, which is normal for an interview-led report.
“says minister”
The headline keeps the attribution, so the claim about raising the pension age above 70 reads as Bell's argument, not as the Guardian's own forecast.
“to £50bn by 2050, according to government estimates”
The cost figure carries its source and its date, so the reader knows it is a government projection rather than an established fact.
“insisted they would stick with the triple lock”
The Conservatives' position is stated in their terms before Bell's argument against it, so the reader knows what the opposition has actually committed to.
Spot something we missed? Report this article