Al Jazeera English, on Iran, 11 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Hormuz Strait will ‘never return’ to pre-war status, Iran’s Ghalibaf says

No framing issues found.

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran’s parliament speaker and top negotiator, has told Al Jazeera that the Strait of Hormuz will “never return” to its status prior to the US-Israel war on Iran.

In an exclusive interview published on Wednesday, Ghalibaf said Iran and Oman reached an understanding to oversee the critical waterway as part of Tehran’s seven-point proposal to end the eight-month conflict.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 items- list 1 of 4Iran backs nuclear treaty even as hardliners raise prospect of bomb

- list 2 of 4Rubio says no need for major combat operations against Iran

- list 3 of 4Iran denies talks with US, says Hormuz will stay shut until demands are met

- list 4 of 4Can Tehran survive a ‘zero oil’ budget, if US blockade on Iran persists?

“There are no ‘free waters’ [international waters] there, and the 1982 [UN Convention on the Law of the Sea] does not apply to the strait … The regulations within the Strait of Hormuz are governed by the laws of the two littoral states that border it,” he said.

Seven conditions

Ghalibaf said Tehran provided a clear response to the US through a Qatari mediator that included its seven conditions for peace talks, adding that Iran is waiting for an official response.

“The ball is now in the American court,” he said.

Iran’s conditions, as outlined by the chief negotiator, include lifting the US-imposed naval blockade and sanctions, the release of Iranian frozen funds, ending fighting on all fronts, and an explicit announcement of an end to the war.

He said these demands were part of the Islamabad memorandum of understanding signed in June and their implementation was necessary before entering negotiations with the US.

“If America limits itself to what has been agreed upon without making excessive demands or engaging in behaviour that breeds distrust, then, naturally, reaching an agreement is possible,” he said.

“What stands in the way of an agreement is our lack of trust in the United States.”

Renewed conflict

Ghalibaf said US officials asked Russian President Vladimir Putin to mediate direct negotiations with Tehran during a visit to Moscow.

He warned against new US attacks against Iran, saying that US President Donald Trump will face another defeat and political pressure from the new Congress that takes office in January.

Iran is determined to move beyond a state of “no war and no peace”, he said, urging a sustainable deterrent capability, including military capabilities.

Yemen mediation

On the ongoing fighting in Yemen between the Saudi-backed internationally recognised government forces and the Houthis, an armed group also known as Ansar Allah (Arabic for “Supporters of God”), Ghalibaf said that “no one should interfere” in it.

“If both the government in Yemen and Saudi Arabia were to ask for our help, we would certainly offer our assistance to help resolve their conflict,” he said.

Iran has previously offered to facilitate talks between Saudi Arabia and Yemen’s Houthi group in October following a series of deadly attacks on the kingdom.

Read the original article on aljazeera.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

Al Jazeera reports an exclusive interview with Iran's parliament speaker and chief negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, on the Strait of Hormuz, Iran's seven conditions for talks and mediation in Yemen. Ghalibaf's claims are attributed to him throughout, and the headline keeps that attribution. Nothing in the article misleads its reader.

What it gets right

  • “the US-Israel war on Iran”

    Al Jazeera names who waged the war in its own voice. It does not reduce it to an agentless conflict.

  • “Iran’s Ghalibaf says”

    The headline keeps the attribution the body gives. A contested claim about the strait's future status is marked as Ghalibaf's, not stated as fact.

  • “the Houthis, an armed group also known as Ansar Allah”

    Al Jazeera names the Yemeni group as itself, with its own name. It does not flatten it into an Iranian proxy.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al Jazeera English

  1. 11 NovIran denies talks with US, says Hormuz will stay shut until demands are met0.0
  2. 10 NovIran backs nuclear treaty even as hardliners raise prospect of bomb0.0
  3. 10 Nov‘Positive momentum’: Is the US war on Iran about to end?0.0
  4. 10 NovWho moves first in Iran-US diplomacy?0.0
  5. 9 NovIran stands by demands to end the war as US ramps up military pressure3.0

Everything we scored from Al Jazeera English

See how 7 outlets covered this story