GB News, on Gaza, 6 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

October 7 pro-Palestine march to go ahead in central London as Met Police say they are powerless

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

A planned pro-Palestine march scheduled to take place tomorrow on the anniversary of the October 7 massacre by Hamas will go ahead, as police place a series of restrictions on the demonstration . A student march is planned in central London on Wednesday, with attendees expected to march from the King’s College London area in the Strand to University College London in Russell Square, Holborn.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says what the marchers are marching for. The organising coalition called on students to "demand an end to the Palestinian genocide". Without this, a reader knows the march only as an event held on the anniversary of what the article calls the October 7 massacre. The reader is left to think the march is about that date rather than a protest against Israel's genocide in Gaza, which the UN Commission of Inquiry has documented.

How we know

DAC Harman said the legal threshold for seeking a ban on the march had not been met. TRENDING Stories Videos Your Say He said: “We hear the calls for this event to be banned. The police cannot ban protests and can only ask the Home Secretary to do so if the risk of serious disorder is so high that it can’t be managed by conditions.

That high bar is not met here. “Comments on social media that we banned other protests, such as a UKIP march in Tower Hamlets, are incorrect.” The police also addressed questions over whether the demonstration itself is illegal, as official organisers have not been identified. Under the conditions, demonstrators must assemble in a designated area of Lincoln’s Inn Fields by 12.30pm, before following a strict route to Russell Square. The police said official organisers have not been identified and the threshold for seeking a ban had not been met | GETTY The rally must conclude by 2pm, when participants will be required to disperse.

Left out here: Leaves out who was behind it

The article says organisers have not been identified. It quotes the Met saying it can identify the groups involved, but never names the University of London Coalition, which other outlets named the same day. A reader is left thinking the march is anonymous.

How we know

The conditions also prohibit participants from wearing face coverings that conceal their identity. Anyone breaching the restrictions can be arrested. Deputy Assistant Commissioner James Harman, who leads Met Operations, including public order policing, said: “This event is being held on the third anniversary of the October 7 terrorist attack on Israel and the start of the ensuing conflict in Gaza. “This will be a day of mourning and reflection for many in London and we know the serious concerns that this event has caused Jewish communities in particular.

“We have imposed stringent conditions on those taking part in this march. These will help us manage the event and minimise serious disruption. “Anyone who breaches these conditions or commits offences should be under no illusion they will face arrest. We have zero tolerance for hate crime and those who chant or display placards calling for intifada or encourage unlawful extremism will be arrested. “We have been asked whether the student march is illegal, as under Section 11 of the Public Order Act organisers must provide a name and address to police.

"While we can identify the groups involved in organising the protest from their social media posts, we have not yet identified any specific individual prepared to accept that they are the organiser of this demonstration. “Under the law, the failure of an organiser to identify themselves does not mean that the specific legal criteria for a ban of a procession is met. Once we have identified the organisers, we can consider offences under Section 11.”

DAC Harman also urged students to reconsider attending the protest, adding: “I would like to take this opportunity – again – to call on anyone intending to join this march to please reflect on the impact and distress it will cause on this very significant date, and exercise your right to protest on a different day.” A separate student protest is also planned at Marble Arch between 1pm and 4pm. The Met said conditions would require that demonstration to take place away from Marble Arch, citing concerns about people attending nearby synagogues.

The established route for the main march is Lincoln’s Inn Fields, Remnant Street, Kingsway, Southampton Row and Russell Square. Participants must remain within designated areas during the assembly and rally and must not deviate from the route. Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter

Read the original article on gbnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

GB News writes in its own voice that the Met chose not to lobby for a ban, when the Met's quoted position is that the legal test for asking for one was not met. It lists unattributed objections that tie the student march to the proscribed Palestine Action without any link in the article. It never names the University of London Coalition or says the marchers' demand was an end to the genocide in Gaza, although other outlets reported both.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “rather than lobby the Home Secretary to ban the event”

    Why this matters
    GB News describes the Met's decision in its own voice as a choice not to lobby for a ban.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the police could have pushed for a ban and chose not to.
    The context
    The Met's quoted position is that it may ask the Home Secretary for a ban only when a legal test is met, and it says that test is not met. Asking for a ban is not a matter of lobbying.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“can only ask the Home Secretary to do so if the risk of serious disorder is so high”

    Show it in the article

  2. Unattributed objections and guilt by association

    Minor

    “The protest faced calls to be cancelled, citing concerns about serious disruption, the impact of the protest on Jewish communities, and activist group Palestine Action being proscribed.”

    Why this matters
    GB News lists objections to the march without saying who made them, and puts the ban on Palestine Action among them.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the student march has some link to the proscribed group Palestine Action.
    The context
    Nothing in the article connects this student march to Palestine Action. The people calling for cancellation are never named, so a reader cannot weigh who raised these concerns.

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says what the marchers are marching for. The organising coalition called on students to "demand an end to the Palestinian genocide". Without this, a reader knows the march only as an event held on the anniversary of what the article calls the October 7 massacre. The reader is left to think the march is about that date rather than a protest against Israel's genocide in Gaza, which the UN Commission of Inquiry has documented.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  4. Leaves out who was behind it

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says organisers have not been identified. It quotes the Met saying it can identify the groups involved, but never names the University of London Coalition, which other outlets named the same day. A reader is left thinking the march is anonymous.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from GB News

Everything we scored from GB News