Daily Star, on UK Politics, 6 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Three in 10 Brits can't afford essential furniture in hidden crisis

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Three in 10 Brits have gone without essential furniture due to financial constraints. Fresh research by DFS, surveying 2,000 adults, revealed that . The data also reveals that , while more than one in five (21%) have been forced to sleep on the floor. One in four have continued using broken or unsafe furniture because they couldn't afford replacements.

DFS is shedding light on the reality of furniture poverty for children and families as part of its ongoing partnership with BBC Children in Need, as its Lead Furniture Partner for Emergency Essentials. Chief people officer for the furniture brand Cherie Donnelly said: "Furniture poverty is one of those problems that can be happening behind any front door. "What's particularly concerning is how much shame surrounds it: when people feel too embarrassed to tell even their friends and family that they're struggling, it becomes incredibly easy for the problem to remain hidden."

The furniture giant has been partnered with BBC Children in Need since 2013, raising over £8m throughout that period. Claire Hoyle, CEO at BBC Children in Need, said they are 'incredibly grateful' for DFS' continued support. She added: "Every child deserves to have a home where they can feel safe, secure and comfortable, but sadly we know that isn't the reality for every family." Three quarters of respondents had never even heard the phrase 'furniture poverty' prior to participating in the research.

This is despite . One in 10 adults have been without a bed at some stage, while 15% have gone without a sofa and 21% without a dining table and chairs. More than half (53%) of adults confessed they had never contemplated that some youngsters in the UK may routinely sleep without their own bed. The OnePoll.com research found 82% of respondents believe going without one could affect a child's sleep, while 75% think their mental wellbeing could suffer and 71% feel their physical health could be impacted.

More than two thirds (67%) believe it could affect concentration at school, with others highlighting confidence and self-esteem (58%) and behaviour (57%). The BBC Children in Need Emergency Essentials programme delivers urgently needed household items to children and families living in furniture poverty across the UK. Whether it's a sofa to bring a family together, a bed to sleep in, a cooker to prepare hot meals, or essential clothing, these items can make a significant difference to a child's daily life and wellbeing.

Claire added: "Together, we want to shine a light on furniture poverty and help more families access the everyday essentials that can have such an important impact on a child's life."

Read the original article on dailystar.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Daily Star prints figures from a DFS-commissioned survey that do not fit together. It says 34% slept on a sofa because they could not afford furniture, more than its own 30% total for going without furniture for money reasons. It also places figures with no stated link to cost, such as eating a meal without a table, straight after a claim about lack of money, and gives a household figure with no source.

  1. Uses figures that mislead

    Serious

    “55% of people have eaten a meal without a table, while 37% have slept on a mattress without a bed frame”

    Why this matters
    The Star places these figures straight after a sentence about going without furniture for lack of money. Nothing in this sentence ties eating without a table or sleeping on a bare mattress to cost.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes more than half of people have had to eat without a table because they could not afford one.
    The context
    The article's own later figures show only 21% have gone without a dining table and 10% without a bed. The 55% and 37% figures count anyone who has ever eaten off their lap or slept on a mattress on the floor, for any reason. They do not measure furniture poverty.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“21% without a dining table and chairs”
    • Elsewhere in the article“One in 10 adults have been without a bed at some stage”

    Show it in the article

    “34% have kipped on a sofa because they couldn't afford the furniture they required”

    Why this matters
    This figure for people who slept on a sofa because they could not afford furniture is higher than the article's headline figure for everyone who has gone without furniture for money reasons.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes both figures as solid measures of the same problem.
    The context
    The article says three in 10, about 30%, have gone without essential furniture for financial reasons. A 34% figure for one way of going without, caused by the same lack of money, cannot sit inside a 30% total. The Star prints both without noting the clash.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“have gone without essential furniture due to financial constraints”

    Show it in the article

    “one in seven households potentially living without basics such as beds, sofas or dining tables”

    Why this matters
    The Star gives a national household figure hedged with "potentially" and names no source or method for it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes one in seven households living without beds, sofas or tables as an established national figure.
    The context
    The survey described in the article asked 2,000 adults about their own past experience. Nothing in the article says how a household figure was worked out or by whom. The word "potentially" shows it is an estimate, not a finding.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The OnePoll.com research found”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    In the DFS survey, 21% said they had gone without a dining table and one in 10 without a bed at some stage. Separately, 55% said they had eaten a meal without a table, though the survey does not say this was for lack of money.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Star

  1. 6 NovInside Downing Street's battle with Russell Brand after ex-PM branded him 'completely wrong'0.0
  2. 6 NovMajor BBC show slammed as viewers brand guest 'proper melt' during live episode3.0
  3. 5 NovAndy Burnham's government hitting drivers with new £375 car tax rule change in months7.3
  4. 5 NovMore Brits than ever are stockpiling food and water after Burnham's government issued warning6.0
  5. 5 NovFirst group to be called up in UK conscription 'refuses to fight' in WW36.0

Everything we scored from Daily Star