The Jerusalem Post, on Iran, 5 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

US sanctions three for aiding Iran's air defenses amid reports of Moscow-Tehran arms deal

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findingsSee them marked on jpost.com

The US State Department sanctioned two individuals and an entity based in Belarus, Russia, and Nigeria for their involvement in Iran's efforts to procure man-portable air-defense systems (MANPADS) on Wednesday.The sanctions are part of Operation Economic Outcast, . A day later, the Financial Times reported that Russia had signed a weapons deal with Iran to with 90 advanced guided missile launchers.

The order, recently uncovered by FT, involved a 2024-2025 production schedule from major Russian defense manufacturer Vympa, which produces helicopter-mounted missile launchers used extensively in the Ukraine-Russia War.An accompanying production schedule seen by FT listed seven Russian customers and two foreign buyers: China and "K-10."K-10, a person familiar with the matter and internal Russian documents obtained by FT told the outlet, is how Russia's state-owned arms agency refers to Iran.At least one contract for Yak-130 jet trainers and light attack aircraft, seen by the FT, lines up with publicly reported deliveries to Iran in 2023 and 2024.“This missile is much faster than a drone and reaches its target far sooner.

At around 230 meters per second, it covers 14km in about a minute,” a representative of Dallas Analytics told the FT. “The concept is shoot-and-scoot: move to a firing position, launch, hit the target, and withdraw quickly."Russia-Iran ties deepen amidst conflict with the WestIranian-Russian ties have evolved from a transactional relationship into a structured, strategic alliance, deepening across military, economic, and geopolitical domains.

This weapons deal is the latest in a series of developments underscoring their growing defensive relationship.

The Iranian-Russian Treaty on Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, signed in January 2025, expanded economic cooperation amid US and international sanctions while strengthening military ties. The FT has previously reported that Russia assisted Iran in the manufacturing of supersonic cruise missiles, sold it shoulder-launched anti-air missiles, and .“It is indicative of Russia's willingness to continue supplying Iran despite its own wartime demands and with far less concern about Western objections than in the past,” Nicole Grajewski of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace told FT.Iran to receive Russian fighter jetsEarlier this week, Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) spokesman General Mohammad Akraminia told local media that Iran is reportedly expected to receive Russian-made Su-35 fighter jets after the US-Iran war ends.Akraminia claimed that before the war began at the end of February, the IRGC was in the final stages of procuring the fighter jets.

He told the Persian-language outlet Tabnak that the Su-35s were meant to arrive before the war.“We have also made progress domestically. Of course, purchasing equipment from abroad will bring us closer to advanced technologies, which we can then use as a foundation for further development,” he said.While he did not specifically name Russia in the interview, it is the only established manufacturer of Su-35s. The fighter jet is Russian-designed and produced by Sukhoi, part of Russia's United Aircraft Corporation.Jerusalem Post Staff contributed to this report.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Jerusalem Post reports new US sanctions and a Financial Times story on a Russian arms deal with Iran. Inside a sentence attributed to FT reporting, it writes of Iran's "nuclear weapons program" as an established fact, with no IAEA finding or Iranian response. In its own voice it describes the US sanctions drive by Washington's stated aim of ending the conflict and calls Iran's government "the regime".

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “assisted the regime in the development of its nuclear weapons program”

    Why this matters
    The words "its nuclear weapons program" assume that Iran has a nuclear weapons programme. The sentence attributes the Russian help to earlier FT reporting, but it presents the existence of a weapons programme as a given.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that Iran runs a nuclear weapons programme and that Russia helped build it.
    The context
    Whether Iran's nuclear programme is a weapons programme is a contested claim made by Israel and the US. The article gives no IAEA finding and no Iranian position, and nothing in it supports the presupposition.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “IAEA”.

    Show it in the article

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “the American effort to economically isolate Tehran and end the ongoing conflict between the two countries”

    Why this matters
    The outlet gives Washington's stated purpose for its sanctions, to "end the ongoing conflict", in its own voice and without attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as fact that the sanctions campaign is aimed at ending the war, which casts the US as the party seeking peace.
    The context
    This is the US government's description of its own aim. The US is a party to the war the article itself calls "the US-Iran war", so its stated motive should be attributed to it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“after the US-Iran war ends”

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “supply the regime”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls Iran's government "the regime" in its own narration, without attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader picks up a verdict on the Iranian government's legitimacy as if it were a neutral description.
    The context
    Elsewhere the article uses neutral names such as "Tehran" and "Iran". The word "regime" carries a judgement the facts in the article do not supply.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“economically isolate Tehran”

    Show it in the article

    “assisted the regime”

    Why this matters
    The outlet uses "the regime" a second time in its own voice. Here the word is attached to the nuclear passage, so the loaded label and the presupposed weapons programme reinforce each other.
    The impression it gives
    A reader links an illegitimate government to an assumed weapons programme.
    The context
    In the same sentence the outlet writes "Russia assisted Iran", which shows that neutral wording was available.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The Iranian-Russian Treaty on Comprehensive Strategic Partnership”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 6 NovDonald Trump says US 'doing very well with Iran'3.0
  2. 5 NovAfter US midterms, is there a time limit on the Iran war? - analysis3.0
  3. 5 NovPahlavi to 'Post' ahead of Freedom Prize: 'Europe's leaders understand Iran's regime must go'3.0
  4. 5 Nov‘Nobody considered this a European problem’: Is Europe ready to stand up to Iranian threats?3.0
  5. 5 NovSouth Korea to expand anti-piracy unit operations closer to Strait of Hormuz3.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post