The Independent, on Iran, 26 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Delegations meeting in Tehran with region on edge over potential for renewed fighting

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

Become an Independent member to bookmark this article Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today. Join today Already a member? Log in High-level delegations from Saudi Arabia , Pakistan and Turkey were in Tehran on Monday for meetings with Iranian authorities to try to avert renewed fighting between Iran and Israel and the United States, two regional officials said.

The talks come as many in Iran are girding themselves for the possible return to a return to all-out war, as Israeli and American leaders have been sharpening their threats ahead of pending elections in both countries, while Iranian leaders have remained defiant. Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman, Pakistan army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir and the head of Turkey’s intelligence service were to meet with Iran’s top security officials and negotiators to push for a deal between Tehran and Washington.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article speaks of "renewed fighting" and a "return to all-out war" but never says the war began with Israeli and US strikes on Iran. Without it, and with Netanyahu's warning that Iran could attack, a reader may take the threat of fighting to come mainly from Iran.

How we know

The war in Yemen and strikes by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels against Saudi Arabia were topics also on the table, said the officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to reporters. An Iranian official, also speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to reporters, confirmed the arrival of the officials. Saudi Arabia said in a statement that the delegations hoped to find “ways to de-escalate tensions, enhance regional security and promote its stability.”

With worries about renewed fighting ahead of Israel's election on Tuesday and the Nov. 3 elections in the United States, Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, on the weekend said Tehran had not closed the window of diplomacy and that messages were being passed to the U.S. via intermediaries. With negotiations long stalled, Baghaei said that the U.S. appears to be persisting in unilateral demands and that Trump and U.S. officials repeatedly use the phrase “complete surrender,” which Baghaei said no Iranian accepts.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu , meantime, repeated his warning on Sunday that Iran or its proxies could attack ahead of the close elections to disrupt the vote, citing intelligence. “The (military) is ready both to defend and to strike,” he said in a video statement, adding: “You will suffer disproportionate blows far greater than you can imagine.” Israel’s Channel 12 reported Sunday night that Netanyahu and his military chief of staff clashed over an instruction by Netanyahu to carry out an “action” that the army believes could quickly trigger a resumption of the conflict with Iran.

Netanyahu described the Channel 12 report as nonsense during an appearance on another broadcaster, Channel 14. There was no immediate military comment. ___ AP journalists Victoria Eastwood in Cairo, Natalie Melzer in Tel Aviv, Israel and David Rising in Bangkok contributed to this story.

Read the original article on independent.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Independent runs an AP report on Saudi, Pakistani and Turkish delegations meeting Iranian officials in Tehran. It attributes each side's claims, including Netanyahu's warning and Baghaei's statements. It never tells the reader that the war it fears resuming began with Israeli and US strikes on Iran, a minor gap in background.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article speaks of "renewed fighting" and a "return to all-out war" but never says the war began with Israeli and US strikes on Iran. Without it, and with Netanyahu's warning that Iran could attack, a reader may take the threat of fighting to come mainly from Iran.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “repeated his warning on Sunday that Iran or its proxies could attack ahead of the close elections to disrupt the vote, citing intelligence”

    The outlet frames the claim that Iran could attack as Netanyahu's own warning, resting on intelligence he cites, rather than as established fact.

  • “Netanyahu and his military chief of staff clashed over an instruction by Netanyahu to carry out an “action” that the army believes could quickly trigger a resumption of the conflict with Iran”

    It reports that the push towards renewed fighting may come from the Israeli prime minister himself, and attributes it to a named broadcaster.

  • “Trump and U.S. officials repeatedly use the phrase “complete surrender,” which Baghaei said no Iranian accepts”

    It gives the Iranian Foreign Ministry's account of the stalled talks in Baghaei's own terms and attributes it clearly.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Independent

Everything we scored from The Independent