The National, on Iran, 13 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

IAEA expresses concern over Iranian underground uranium-enrichment plant

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

The ​<a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/tags/un/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/tags/un/">UN</a> ​nuclear ⁠watchdog says it is becoming “increasingly ⁠concerned” about ​an underground uranium enrichment plant ⁠at Isfahan that <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/tags/iran/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/tags/iran/">Iran</a> declared last year ⁠but has ​not ⁠allowed any inspections.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says Iran declared the Isfahan plant last year but has not allowed any inspections. It never says the IAEA had planned to inspect the plant on 13 June 2025, and that the US and Israeli bombing campaign began that day and made the inspection impossible. Without this, a reader takes the lack of any inspection as Iran's refusal alone from the start. In fact the first planned visit was prevented by the strikes. Iran's later refusals to admit inspectors are a separate matter.

How we know

“The agency does not know IFEP's [Isfahan Fuel Enrichment Plant] exact location, status for safeguards purposes or ​whether ‌it ⁠contains nuclear ​material,” the International ​Atomic ‌Energy Agency ⁠said in a confidential report. The agency was unable to determine whether any nuclear material had been diverted from peaceful activities, according to the 13-page document circulated in Vienna on Friday. Agency monitors have been barred from viewing Iran's uranium enrichment sites since the US and Israel conducted joint strikes in June last year.

US President Donald Trump said Iran's nuclear programme was “obliterated” by those strikes. However, it is not clear what happened to the more than 400kg of near weapons-grade enriched uranium that the agency estimates Iran had produced before the attacks.<b> </b> “It is more than a year since the agency lost continuity of knowledge in relation to the previously declared inventories of highly enriched uranium,” its Director General Rafael Grossi wrote in the report, which was seen by <i>Bloomberg News</i>.

“The agency is not able to conclude that there has been no diversion of declared nuclear material from peaceful nuclear activities.” Iran's national security chief Mohsen Rezaei said the country ​would ⁠not ⁠allow "​a single particle” ⁠of enriched nuclear material ⁠to leave ​the country. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also asked the agency and the UN to condemn a US offer of a $20 million reward for information on Tehran’s nuclear programme.

The US State Department said the reward was for details on Iran's nuclear facilities, equipment and associated personnel, including scientists and their whereabouts. Washington has said ​the nuclear ‌issue ⁠must be ​part ​of ‌any ⁠negotiations with Tehran ⁠aimed at ending the latest war launched by <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/tags/israel/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/tags/israel/">Israel</a> and the US against Iran in February.

Mr Trump listed the need to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons among the reasons for the renewed attacks.

Read the original article on thenationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The National reports the IAEA's confidential finding that it cannot inspect or locate Iran's declared Isfahan enrichment plant, and it attributes the agency's concerns, Trump's claims and Iranian officials' statements to each of them. It names the US and Israel as the parties that carried out the strikes and launched the war. The one gap is that it never says the IAEA's planned first inspection of the plant was stopped by the US and Israeli bombing that began that same day. Nothing in the article seriously misleads.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says Iran declared the Isfahan plant last year but has not allowed any inspections. It never says the IAEA had planned to inspect the plant on 13 June 2025, and that the US and Israeli bombing campaign began that day and made the inspection impossible. Without this, a reader takes the lack of any inspection as Iran's refusal alone from the start. In fact the first planned visit was prevented by the strikes. Iran's later refusals to admit inspectors are a separate matter.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “since the US and Israel conducted joint strikes in June last year”

    The National names who carried out the strikes, in the active voice, rather than writing that sites were hit.

  • “that the agency estimates Iran had produced before the attacks”

    The near weapons-grade stockpile figure is attributed to the IAEA as its estimate, not stated as the outlet's own fact. The sentence also sets the agency's uncertainty against Trump's 'obliterated' claim.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The National

  1. 12 NovTrump says US no longer needs Iran deal 0.0
  2. 11 NovIndicted Iranians 'filmed studying map of London as they plot sabotage attacks'0.0
  3. 11 NovUS envoy Tom Barrack says Iraq offers bridge over US and Iran conflict0.0
  4. 10 NovEuropean ministers cautious over Strait of Hormuz after G7 briefings3.0
  5. 10 NovUS pulls aircraft from second UK airbase 'over Iran threat'0.0

Everything we scored from The National