The Intercept, on West Bank, 30 September 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Fetterman Sole Dem

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Every Democratic senator except Pennsylvania’s John Fetterman voted on Tuesday for a measure seeking to hold accountable Israeli soldiers and settlers who have killed U.S. citizens in the West Bank. The vote stood as a sign of how much the party’s position on Israel has shifted in the last two years. Fetterman, who takes a hard pro-Israel line, was the lone holdout in his party despite having one of his constituents being the most recent Palestinian American killed in the West Bank by Israeli settlers.

Near unanimous Democratic support, however, was not enough to secure passage of the measure, with the Senate voting 51-47 against advancing the resolution. The measure would have required the State Department to report on whether it is investigating the killings of nine U.S. citizens by Israeli security forces or settlers since 2022. Although the resolution was crafted to focus on victims most sympathetic to U.S. elected officials — — it still drew nearly universal opposition fromSenate Republicans.

Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky was the only member of the GOP to vote in favor of it. The most recent U.S. citizen killed by settlers in the West Bank was a 19-year-old from Philadelphia . Though local Pennsylvania officials called for an investigation, neither Fetterman nor his Republican counterpart from Pennsylvania, Sen. Dave McCormick, voted for the Senate measure. Related Israeli Soldiers Killed 15 Protesters in the Same Place They Shot Aysenur Eygi The resolution’s sponsor, Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., said last week that he has struggled to get information from both the Biden and Trump administrations about whether they are pursuing justice for U.S. citizens killed in the West Bank.

“The Biden administration did not do enough to secure justice, and the Trump administration has not done enough,” he said. “And if we can’t get accountability and justice for American citizens, imagine how hard it is for Palestinian families who don’t have a U.S. passport to get justice and accountability when they are killed or their villages get razed.” Setting Up an Embargo Van Hollen’s measure would have required the State Department to report on whether it or the Justice Department are investigating the killings of U.S. citizens in the West Bank, including that of Palestinian American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh , who was slain by the Israeli military while reporting on an Israeli raid on a refugee camp in 2022.

Related Israeli Forces Keep Killing Americans While U.S. Officials Give Them a Pass Van Hollen’s resolution also directed the State Department to report on the status of U.S. citizens held in Israeli prisons or military detention, pointing to the lengthy incarceration of a Palestinian American 16-year-old boy from Florida. Advocates hoped the resolution would help them accomplish much larger aims, however. Under U.S. law, the government is forbidden from selling arms to countries that engage in “a consistent pattern of gross violations” of human rights.

Van Hollen’s resolution asks whether Israel’s actions fit that pattern. In a policy paper published earlier this month, the pro-Palestine nonprofit IMEU Policy Project argued that abiding by foreign assistance law “would require halting all arms exports to Israel, whether from private U.S. companies or the U.S. government, irrespective of whether purchases are paid for with U.S. or foreign funds.” Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mt., pointed to that larger aim when he argued against the resolution on the Senate floor.

“Make no mistake: The sole objective here is not justice or accountability for Americans,” Daines said. “It is to cut off security aid to our ally Israel in its time of need.” “Of course, any loss, all loss of American life is a tragedy,” Daines continued, adding that he was “very confident this administration will get to the bottom of this issue.” We’re independent of corporate interests — and powered by members. Join us. Become a member Join Our Newsletter Thank You For Joining!

Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. Will you take the next step to support our independent journalism by becoming a member of The Intercept? I'm in Become a member By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Join Our Newsletter Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. I'm in Growing Support Tuesday’s vote centered on whether to discharge the resolution from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Resolutions such as the one Van Hollen offered are privileged, meaning that they are the rare type of measure where any senator can force a full floor vote. Related Trump Halts Sanctions on Israeli Settlers, Threatens to Seize Assets of War Crimes Investigators Van Hollen said last week in a briefing hosted by IMEU Policy Project that his resolution had drawn far more support, in the form of co-sponsorships by other Senate Democrats, than a similar push sponsored by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.,

That measure, brought weeks after the October 7 attacks, drew the support of Paul and just 10 members of the Democratic caucus. Since then, Democrats have soured on Israel and increasingly support Palestine, according to public opinion polls . Mainstream Democrats are also facing off against a Republican in the White House rather than Biden, who generally got a free hand from his own party when it came Israel. “While I was pleased that so many of my Democratic colleagues joined this effort, it’s clear the United States must do more,” Van Hollen said in a statement after the vote on Tuesday.

“It is our responsibility to ensure recipients of U.S. taxpayer dollars act in line with our laws and our values – this resolution was an opportunity to shed light on a reality that flies in the face of that principle.” Share Copy link Share on Facebook Share on Bluesky Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT. What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government.

This is not hyperbole. Court orders are being ignored. MAGA loyalists have been put in charge of the military and federal law enforcement agencies. The Department of Government Efficiency has stripped Congress of its power of the purse. News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation. Yet far too many are still covering Trump’s assault on democracy like politics as usual, with flattering headlines describing Trump as “unconventional,” “testing the boundaries,” and “aggressively flexing power.”

The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments, billionaire oligarchs, and backsliding democracies around the world. We understand the challenge we face in Trump and the vital importance of press freedom in defending democracy. We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us? $15 $25 $50 $100 $5 $8 $10 $15 One Time Monthly Donate IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history. We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press.

Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking. In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow. That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?

We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us? $15 $25 $50 $100 $5 $8 $10 $15 One Time Monthly Donate I’M BEN MUESSIG, The Intercept’s editor-in-chief. It’s been a devastating year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history. We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America.

Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking. In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow. That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026? We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us? $15 $25 $50 $100 $5 $8 $10 $15 One Time Monthly Donate Contact the author: Matt Sledge sledge@theintercept.com @sledge.41 on Signal Related Armed Israeli Settlers Detained Ro Khanna.

He Wants Their Illegal Outposts Demolished. American Nurse Who Tried to Save “No Other Land” Activist Was Detained and Deported by Israel “A Final, Deadly Exclamation Point”: Biden Backs Down on 30-Day Israel Arms Ultimatum Israeli Forces Deliberately Killed Palestinian American Journalist, Report Shows Latest Stories Voices Inside the Business of Trump’s Third-Country Deportations Tyler McBrien - Sep. 29 As the Trump administration fights to keep deporting immigrants to countries where they have no connections, we studied the system that profits from these grave abuses.

The War on Immigrants Prison That Didn’t Report Sex Abuse Allegation Against Staffer to Reopen as ICE Camp John Washington - Sep. 29 A whistleblower says the warden didn’t make a federally required disclosure. Now the company is turning the Arizona prison into an ICE jail. Chilling Dissent The Intercept Sues Texas City Over Refusal to Release Police Records on Prairieland Protest Noah Hurowitz - Sep. 29 “This is one of the singularly most distressing cases that I’ve seen in terms of public access to records.

This is stonewalling on steroids.” Join The Conversation

Read the original article on theintercept.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Intercept reports the failed Senate vote plainly and names who killed the Americans at issue: settlers and Israeli occupation forces. Three small faults remain. The headline turns a reporting requirement into a vote on an investigation, one line dates a post-October 7 measure to 2014, and another line credits all the killings to the settlement movement when the article itself says Israeli forces killed some of them.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Against Investigating His Constituent’s Killer”

    Why this matters
    The headline says Fetterman voted against investigating the killer of his constituent.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the Senate voted on whether to open an investigation into a specific killing.
    The context
    The body says the measure would only have required the State Department to report on whether it is investigating the killings of nine U.S. citizens. It was a reporting requirement, not an investigation.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“report on whether it is investigating the killings of nine U.S. citizens”

    Show it in the article

  2. Makes a false claim

    Minor

    “in 2014.”

    Why this matters
    The article dates Sanders's earlier measure to 2014.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the comparison vote took place a decade ago.
    The context
    The next sentence says the measure came weeks after the October 7 attacks, so it cannot date from 2014. The article contradicts itself on when the comparison vote happened.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“brought weeks after the October 7 attacks”

    Show it in the article

  3. Makes a false claim

    Minor

    “American citizens slain at the hands of the right-wing Jewish settlement movement”

    Why this matters
    The article says the victims the resolution covers were slain by the settlement movement.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes all the Americans covered by the resolution were killed by settlers.
    The context
    The article itself says the nine were killed by Israeli security forces or settlers. It names Shireen Abu Akleh as slain by the Israeli military. Israeli occupation forces drop out of this line.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“by Israeli security forces or settlers since 2022”
    • Elsewhere in the article“who was slain by the Israeli military”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “who was slain by the Israeli military while reporting on an Israeli raid on a refugee camp in 2022”

    It names the Israeli military as the killer of Shireen Abu Akleh and calls the operation a raid.

  • “the most recent Palestinian American killed in the West Bank by Israeli settlers”

    It names settlers as the killers rather than hiding the actor.

  • “the killings of nine U.S. citizens by Israeli security forces or settlers since 2022”

    It calls the deaths killings and names both groups responsible.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Intercept

Everything we scored from The Intercept