Metro, on UK Politics, 10 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Three more London schools could close as pupil numbers plummet

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Some schools are running at less than 50% capacity (Picture: Getty Images) Three schools in Enfield have become the latest at risk of closing in London because of falling pupil numbers. The local Conservative council have proposed closing Bishop Stopford’s School, Starks Field Primary School and Suffolks Primary School in north London, claiming reduced pupil numbers are making them financially challenging to operate. According to a council report, Bishop Stopford’s School is operating at less than half its capacity, while Starks Field Primary School is below 45%.

Meanwhile, Suffolks Primary School is projected to fall below 37% occupancy by 2029. Councils in Richmond-upon-Thames, Newham, Camden and Ealing have also proposed closing a number of local schools, citing lower birth rates across London as one of the key factors contributing to plummeting pupil numbers. Research commissioned by London Councils, led by Islington Council, found 90 schools in the capital have either closed or merged in the last five years.

Bishop Stopford’s School could face closure (Picture: Bishop Stopford’s School) Cllr Una O’Halloran, London Council’s executive member for children and education, said: ‘Boroughs will exhaust every possible option before closing a school, but this situation is driven by factors outside our control forcing us into making tough decisions. ‘We are doing all we can to minimise disruption to children and families, and to maintain London’s impressive record of high school standards.’

Inner London schools have been particularly affected, with demand for schools in central London gradually thinning out. The pandemic saw many families move out of the city completely and the continued cost of living crisis has made it hard for these families to return, which has had a knock-on effect on pupil numbers in London schools. Andrea Cassius, head teacher of Suffolks Primary School, said she accepted pupil numbers were falling well below the national average, but recent investment into supporting SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) pupils was reason enough for them to remain open.

Cassius said the school opened autism units for Key Stages One and Two, as well as speech and language support and other inclusion services. Cassius said: ‘We’ve got a huge range of needs that we meet within our school. Starks Field Primary School Enfield is also at risk (Picture: Google Maps) ‘We’ve been working with the borough for two years on giving the borough something that’s well needed within the borough to support all of our families.’

During the summer, the council agreed to double provision for autistic children at the school, from 20 pupils to 40. A further expansion of another 20 pupils has been designated for September 2027. Campaigners against the proposal recently gathered at Enfield Civic Centre where the future of the schools was discussed at a scrutiny committee meeting. The proposed plans to close the three schools were initially brought by the local council but were then ‘called in’ by Labour councillors.

According to Labour’s call-in request, the Conservative administration’s school closure report contained ‘material inaccuracies and inconsistencies’. The request said it did not adequately explain why the three schools were selected for potential closure or repurposing compared to other schools experiencing similar falling numbers. The council said it was committed to a ‘fair and transparent consultation’ and all three schools were identified as being at risk because of falling and projected pupil numbers, surplus places, budget pressures and the impact of reduced pupil funding.

The proposals were referred to the Cabinet and a spokesperson for the Enfield Council confirmed a six-week consultation on the proposals for the three schools will go ahead. Enfield North MP Feryal Clark, who joined campaigners seeking to keep the schools open in Enfield, said any proposed closure ‘shouldn’t be the first point of call’, especially at a time when demand for SEND provision was growing across the borough. She also raised concerns about the impact on pupils at Bishop Stopford’s School if the proposals were ultimately approved. ‘You’ve got children in the middle of studying for their GCSEs and A-levels.

Where are they going to go?’ she said. In October, parents at Kew-Riverside primary school in Richmond-upon-Thames submitted a revised proposal to challenge the council’s decision to close the school by September 2027 – despite receiving a glowing review from Ofsted just a few months earlier. Schools across the capital are seeing pupil numbers dwindle (Picture: Getty Images) There are hopes that population numbers in London could increase again in the future.

But given the rate at which schools across the city are currently closing down, . Cllr Una O’Halloran said: ‘London’s population has always ebbed and flowed. While pupil numbers may be declining now, the trend could well reverse in the long term. ‘Boroughs are therefore keen to ensure our education estate is protected as much as possible and we have school sites able to meet future levels of need.’

She added this would require the government working closer with local councils to collectively decide what happens to vacant school premises in the short to medium term. She added: ‘Boroughs would welcome support with capital costs from the government to convert closed schools into specialist provision for children with special educational needs and disabilities where there is demand.’ A spokesperson for the Mayor of London said: ‘Decisions to close schools are made by local councils, but the Mayor recognises that the closure of any school can be a stressful experience for children, parents and staff. ‘London’s changing population and the current falling numbers of primary school pupils, particularly in inner London, reflect a range of factors, including falling birth rates, the long-term impact of Brexit, and cost-of-living challenges. ‘The Mayor is doing all he can to support families and young people, including building more new homes for Londoners than any time since the 1930s, funding free school meals to all state primary school children, cleaning up the air young Londoners breathe and investing £30 million in youth clubs, building a better London for everyone.’

No formal decision has been made on the future of any of the three schools in Enfield and are subject to a consultation first.

Read the original article on metro.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Metro reports Enfield council's proposal to close three schools over falling pupil numbers. It attributes the council's reasons, the Labour call-in and the campaigners' objections to those who made them, and says no decision has been taken. One sentence offers an unsourced worry that London may soon run short of schools, which the article's own facts on surplus places do not support.

  1. Unsourced worry in the outlet's voice

    Minor

    “there are worries that soon there won’t be enough schools in London at all”

    Why this matters
    The words "there are worries" put a dramatic prediction in Metro's own voice and name no one who holds it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader may believe someone credible warns that London faces a near-term shortage of school places.
    The context
    No source is given for this worry. The article's own reporting describes surplus places and falling pupil numbers. London Councils' representative speaks only of keeping sites available in case the trend reverses in the long term.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“falling and projected pupil numbers, surplus places, budget pressures”
    • Elsewhere in the article“the trend could well reverse in the long term”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “claiming reduced pupil numbers are making them financially challenging to operate”

    Metro attributes the council's justification for the closures to the council rather than stating it as fact.

  • “According to Labour’s call-in request, the Conservative administration’s school closure report contained ‘material inaccuracies and inconsistencies’”

    Metro reports the opposition's challenge with clear attribution and then gives the council's response, so both parties' claims are sourced.

  • “No formal decision has been made on the future of any of the three schools in Enfield”

    Metro tells the reader plainly that the closures are proposals subject to consultation, which matches the hedged "could close" in the headline.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Metro

  1. 10 NovEducation secretary ‘really regrets’ Ed Miliband’s 2015 Russell Brand interview0.0
  2. 10 NovMillions in London issued with ‘toxic air’ alert due to thick fog and fireworks0.0
  3. 9 NovSuspended Reform councillor guilty after saying ‘Nigerians should be melted down’8.0
  4. 9 NovUK faces extreme ‘code red’ air pollution alert following Bonfire Night3.0
  5. 8 NovUK military chief says Russia threat is 'most dangerous period he's known'3.0

Everything we scored from Metro