Daily Star, on UK Politics, 5 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

UK 'dangerously exposed' and

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Britain is dangerously vulnerable to economic blackmail due to its reliance on "weaponised" Chinese critical minerals, MPs have cautioned. An inquiry has found that without securing supplies of critical minerals, Britain cannot re-arm, achieve net zero or construct AI infrastructure deemed essential for future prosperity. The Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee has stated the Government appears unable to meet its 10 tests to "precision de-risk" UK supply chains and start countering the threat of economic coercion.

According to experts, China controls the refining of nearly all critical minerals. The country's leadership unofficially blocked exports of rare earth elements to Japan in 2010, after Japan's detention of the captain of a Chinese trawling vessel over a dispute in the East China Sea. This reportedly triggered a 26-fold surge in commodity prices. The Government's critical minerals strategy forms part of efforts to tackle supply chain vulnerabilities and protect sectors including defence, clean energy and advanced manufacturing.

However, the committee has revealed Britain lacks current geological surveys, while high energy costs render domestic processing uneconomical. Around 80% of UK metal waste is shipped abroad rather than recycled domestically, while outdated restrictions on public finance institutions are hindering investment in alternative supplies, it added. The committee has urged a five-part plan to address Britain's most dangerous dependencies. These recommendations include prioritising sovereign capabilities in areas where reliance on China poses unacceptable risks, and combining government and industry intelligence on minerals currently obscured within trade statistics to predict demand.

The committee additionally called for domestic mining, processing and recycling to be maximised, alongside the creation of allied 'buyers' clubs to share the costs of new mines and smelters. A critical minerals finance facility should also be established, bringing together institutions to fund strategic projects. The committee recommended "freeing" British International Investment, the Government's development finance institution, to take equity stakes in overseas mining ventures.

It also pushed for widening UK Export Finance's remit to bolster economic security, while highlighting how the National Wealth Fund's £25 million minimum equity investment makes financing smaller, early-stage projects particularly challenging. Committee chairman Liam Byrne said: "Critical minerals are the alpha of the new economy. We cannot re-arm Britain, build AI or deliver net zero unless we secure the minerals these technologies depend on.

Yet 16 years after China first weaponised its chokehold over rare earths, Britain remains dangerously exposed. "We don't know enough about what minerals we need or where to find them. Our energy costs make processing uneconomic, we're exporting valuable metal waste, and our public finance institutions are shackled by outdated rules. We're never going to eliminate Chinese minerals from our supply chains. "But it's foolish to leave Britain exposed to economic coercion when we could be building alternative supplies.

That's why we need a new critical minerals finance facility with the financial firepower to invest in new mines, processing plants and recycling, working with our allies to share the costs. De-risking even a prudent proportion of our supplies will take over a decade. Britain cannot afford to drift. "We must act now before dangerous dependencies become strategic liabilities." A Government spokesperson responded: "We are taking bold action through our critical minerals strategy, forging new international partnerships to improve our supply chains, while also delivering £400 million to ramp up domestic production and recycling.

"Our strategy also sets clear goals for 2035, including meeting 10% of demand through domestic production and 20% through recycling, with no more than 60% of any critical minerals coming from any single country – building resilience for industry both at home and further afield."

Read the original article on dailystar.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Daily Star reports a Commons committee warning that Britain depends on China for critical minerals and sets out its five-part plan and the Government's reply, with the body attributing claims carefully. The headline goes further than the body. In its own voice it calls China an "enemy nation" and ties the story to rising "WW3 fears", yet nothing in the body says either.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “needs enemy nation to build weapons”

    Why this matters
    The words "enemy nation" are the Daily Star's own label for China, written outside the quotation marks that hold "dangerously exposed".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the MPs' report describes China as Britain's enemy and that Britain depends on a hostile state for its weapons.
    The context
    No one in the body calls China an enemy. The committee and its chair Liam Byrne speak of supply dependency and the risk of economic coercion, and Byrne says Chinese minerals will never be eliminated from supply chains. The body also says re-arming is one of three goals, alongside net zero and AI, that need critical minerals.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“it's foolish to leave Britain exposed to economic coercion”
    • Elsewhere in the article“We're never going to eliminate Chinese minerals from our supply chains.”
    • Elsewhere in the article“We cannot re-arm Britain, build AI or deliver net zero”

    Show it in the article

    “as WW3 fears rise”

    Why this matters
    The phrase "as WW3 fears rise" sets the committee's report against a coming world war.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the report or the MPs warned of, or responded to, a growing threat of a third world war.
    The context
    The body is about supply chains, geological surveys, energy costs, metal recycling and public finance rules. The only conflict it describes is China's 2010 restriction on rare earth exports to Japan. Nothing in the body mentions a world war or rising fears of one.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Britain lacks current geological surveys, while high energy costs render domestic processing uneconomical”
    • Elsewhere in the article“unofficially blocked exports of rare earth elements to Japan in 2010”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    UK 'dangerously exposed' to economic coercion over reliance on Chinese critical minerals, MPs warn.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Star

  1. 5 NovAndy Burnham's government hitting drivers with new £375 car tax rule change in months7.3
  2. 5 NovMore Brits than ever are stockpiling food and water after Burnham's government issued warning6.0
  3. 5 NovFirst group to be called up in UK conscription 'refuses to fight' in WW36.0
  4. 5 NovAndy Burnham government's three-word response over smoky bacon crisps ban fears0.0
  5. 4 NovPolice officer accused of sex worker calls claims 'phone given to stranger on night out'3.0

Everything we scored from Daily Star