The Spectator opinion piece, on UK Politics, 15 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found
About this analysis

Melanie McDonagh argues in a Spectator column that a staggered age of consent would be too complicated to enforce, and she proposes a single age of 17. She reports the allegations against David Walliams as allegations and gives his denial. Nothing in the piece misleads its reader on the grounds that apply to opinion writing.

Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.

What it gets right

  • “who is alleged to have preyed on 15-year-old girls”

    The column attributes the allegations against Walliams rather than stating them as fact, which matches the Spectator's own earlier report and the Guardian's coverage.

  • “He denies any wrongdoing.”

    It gives the named man's denial straight after the allegation, so a reader does not take an unproven charge as settled.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Spectator

  1. 15 NovThe tragedy of Piddington0.0
  2. 14 NovThree cheers for Rishi Sunak0.0
  3. 14 NovThe plan to ruin Westminster’s Smith Square0.0
  4. 14 NovWhy have the Samaritans abandoned Scunthorpe?0.0
  5. 13 NovRejoining the EU would cost £750m a week6.0

Everything we scored from The Spectator