The New York Times, on Iran, 12 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

They Left Iran, but Now the Regime Is Seizing Their Assets to Silence Them

No framing issues found.

The retired couple in Iran first realized that something was wrong when their bank cards stopped working in early May. After inquiring with the authorities, they discovered that their assets had been frozen by order of the country’s intelligence ministry. The couple learned, eventually, that they were being punished for the actions of their daughter Noushin Najafiragheb, who lived in Europe — specifically, for her social media posts opposing the Iranian government, according to another daughter, Mehrnoush Najafiragheb.

Across Iran, the government has used asset seizures as punishment for actions taken abroad. Homes and businesses have been seized, life savings raided, family heirlooms taken. When those targeted had little inside Iran themselves, the authorities went after their family members back home, interviews show. As the Najafiragheb family pressed their case with the authorities, Mehrnoush said, they encountered dozens of other people facing the specter of losing their life’s savings as punishment for the actions of their relatives abroad.

“We realized we weren’t alone,” Ms. Najafiragheb recalled her mother telling her. She said her sister Noushin had declined to be interviewed to avoid further government pressure on her family. Image The Iranian authorities have gone after critics of the government outside the country, in some cases freezing or seizing the bank accounts of their family members in Iran. Credit... Agence France-Presse — Getty Images We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in . Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The New York Times reports that Iran's intelligence ministry froze the assets of a retired couple, which another daughter says was punishment for her sister's social media posts opposing the government from Europe. It also reports that the government has used such seizures more widely, and it names the intelligence ministry as the body behind the freeze. The rest of the text is cut off by a paywall, so only the opening passages could be assessed.

What it gets right

  • “their assets had been frozen by order of the country’s intelligence ministry”

    The article names the specific body responsible for the asset freeze rather than hiding the actor.

  • “according to another daughter, Mehrnoush Najafiragheb”

    The reason given for the freeze is attributed to a named family member rather than stated as established fact.

  • “had declined to be interviewed to avoid further government pressure on her family”

    The article tells the reader plainly why the targeted person is not quoted, so the gap in sourcing is explained rather than hidden.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

  1. 11 NovU.S. Efforts to Tighten Blockade of Iran Rely on Reluctant Neighbors0.0
  2. 11 NovBessent Is Moved From D.C.-Area Home to Military Base Amid Iranian Threats0.0
  3. 10 NovRubio Says ‘Major Combat Operations’ in Iran War Are No Longer Needed0.0
  4. 8 NovHere Are the Difficult Options Trump Is Weighing to Resolve the War in Iran3.0
  5. 5 NovIran is Reviewing ‘Concrete Proposals’ on Nuclear Program, Officials Say0.0

Everything we scored from The New York Times