Daily Mail, on UK Politics, 24 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

Whitehall sources revealed that the Prime Minister and Chancellor John Healey are plotting to override the opposition of Mr Miliband and Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh by pumping Rosebank's 500 million barrels of oil. Mr Miliband has previously referred to proposals for the oil field as 'climate vandalism'.

The decision is understood to have been reached during tense preparations for Wednesday's Budget, which have highlighted the fragile state of the nation's finances, the lack of growth in the economy and the destabilising effect of high energy prices. Mr Healey is struggling to put together a package of support for low-income families and suffering businesses against a backdrop of high Government borrowing costs and shrinking 'fiscal headroom' – the cushion of extra money kept by the Treasury as an insurance against unforeseen hits to the economy.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says the Rosebank decision is made by the Energy Secretary through a quasi-judicial process, or that she has insisted the decision is hers and not the Prime Minister's. Without this a reader believes Burnham and Healey can simply decide and override her.

How we know

Drilling Rosebank would be a further blow for those environmentalists and Labour MPs who objected to a decision last week to approve the exploitation of the Jackdaw gas field. They say Rosebank, which lies 80 miles west of the Shetlands and is the UK's largest undeveloped oil and gas field, would emit seven times the carbon dioxide of Jackdaw. More than 90 per cent of its reserves are oil, the majority of which is likely to be exported to the global market.

The Prime Minister and Chancellor John Healey (pictured on September 28, 2026) are planning override Ed Miliband and give the green light to drill the North Sea's Rosebank oil field Drilling Rosebank would be a blow for Labour MPs who recently objected to a decision to approve the exploitation of the Jackdaw gas field The news comes despite briefings last week from aides to Ms Fahnbulleh that she was 'minded' to reject Rosebank drilling.

In an attempt to mollify Mr Miliband and Ms Fahnbulleh, a proportion of the proceeds of the drilling would be funnelled into the Energy Wealth Fund, which was set up to invest in renewable and low-carbon technology. The tax revenues will be backed with an initial £2 billion into the fund. Last night a minister said: 'Both Andy and John have decided Rosebank needs to go ahead. The economic and energy security case is so strong, and the Energy Wealth Fund will help mitigate concerns around the environment. 'The unions are strongly behind the decision and so are the bulk of the PLP [Parliamentary Labour Party].

It's the only sensible decision.' In March, Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: 'The Government's position on oil and gas is putting jobs and national security at risk. Blocking oil and gas production in the North Sea, especially now, is simply an act of monumental political self-harm. 'Domestic gas from Jackdaw and oil from Rosebank are essential for jobs and for energy security.'

Voters are also supportive of new oil drilling, according to polling conducted by Lord Ashcroft, the former Conservative deputy chairman. He found that 48 per cent wanted the ban on North Sea oil exploration lifted, compared with 32 per cent who wanted it to remain. In addition, a majority – 53 per cent – did not think Mr Miliband's Net Zero ambitions were worth it if the price to pay was higher household bills. Voters are also cynical about the impact of Britain's environmental measures on the global climate, with only 32 per cent thinking it makes any difference.

They place climate change fourth on the list of national priorities, behind the cost of living, immigration and the NHS. The decision comes after Baroness Harman, a former deputy party leader, yesterday urged ministers to 'make the green argument' for supporting Rosebank. She said: 'I think they should approve it, and I think they should strongly make the green argument for doing it by investing the proceeds into turbocharging our homegrown renewable energy.'

The move will be welcomed by Donald Trump, who popularised the phrase 'drill baby drill' in his 2024 election campaign. The US President said after the Jackdaw announcement: 'I've been after them [Britain] to do that for two years... It's going to make the UK a very wealthy country.'

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The Daily Mail's headline states as fact that Andy Burnham and John Healey are set to approve Rosebank, dropping the attribution to unnamed sources that its body gives. The Mail leaves out that the Energy Secretary decides Rosebank through a quasi-judicial process, which its own earlier reporting carried. It also calls Ed Miliband an 'eco-zealot' in its own voice and presents the unions as united behind drilling.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “Andy Burnham and John Healey set to defy eco-zealot Ed Miliband by giving Rosebank oil field green light”

    Why this matters
    The headline states as settled fact that Burnham and Healey are set to approve Rosebank, with no attribution to anyone.
    The impression it gives
    That the Prime Minister and Chancellor have decided to approve Rosebank and that this is confirmed.
    The context
    The body rests on unnamed 'Whitehall sources' and an anonymous minister, and says the decision 'is understood' to have been reached. Downing Street dismissed the reports that Burnham backed Rosebank as speculation. The Energy Secretary, not Miliband, says she makes the final decision.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Burnham and Healey back Rosebank oil field approval, minister claims, as Downing Street calls reports speculation.

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article never says the Rosebank decision is made by the Energy Secretary through a quasi-judicial process, or that she has insisted the decision is hers and not the Prime Minister's. Without this a reader believes Burnham and Healey can simply decide and override her.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “Andy Burnham is planning to defy Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband by giving the green light to drill the North Sea's Rosebank oil field.”

    Why this matters
    The opening sentence states in the Mail's own voice what the Prime Minister is planning, with no source attached.
    The impression it gives
    That Burnham's plan to approve Rosebank is an established fact.
    The context
    The only named basis is an anonymous minister quoted later. Downing Street dismissed the claim that Burnham backed Rosebank as speculation. The article itself reports that the Energy Secretary's aides said she was minded to reject it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Last night a minister said”
    • Elsewhere in the article“briefings last week from aides to Ms Fahnbulleh that she was 'minded' to reject Rosebank drilling”
    • The Telegraph reported“Downing Street dismissed reports that Mr Burnham also supported Rosebank as speculation.”Healey backs oil drilling at Rosebank (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    “The unions have lobbied the Government to approve the drilling to preserve jobs in the industry.”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Mail says 'The unions' lobbied for approval, repeating the minister's line that the unions are strongly behind it.
    The impression it gives
    That the trade union movement is united in backing Rosebank.
    The context
    The union movement is divided. One union's general secretary, Andrea Egan, called approving Rosebank an even graver mistake than Jackdaw and urged the Prime Minister to reject it. The Mail quotes only the unions in favour.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  5. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “eco-zealot”

    Why this matters
    The headline labels Ed Miliband an 'eco-zealot' in the Mail's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    That Miliband's opposition to Rosebank is fanaticism rather than a stated policy position.
    The context
    The body reports only that he called the proposals 'climate vandalism', a position also shared by Labour MPs and environmentalists. Nothing in the article supports the label.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“referred to proposals for the oil field as 'climate vandalism'”

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 24 OctBBC education website used by millions takes down Leftist views after pushing 'extreme views' on migration and Net Zero6.0
  2. 24 OctCalls to investigate ex-Chancellor Rachel Reeves over secret meetings with City firms6.0
  3. 24 OctANDREW GRIFFITH: Healey must quit this job too if he fails to ramp up defence spending0.0
  4. 24 OctAndy Burnham touts possible return to free movement between UK and EU as he says he wants 'honest discussion'3.0
  5. 24 OctFury as Green Party activist given 'free rein by BBC' to lambast Jewish woman3.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail