Al Arabiya English, on UK Politics, 6 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Britain likely to expel Israeli diplomats if Jerusalem consulate closes, sources say

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Britain is likely to expel Israeli diplomats if Israel carries out its order to shut the British consulate in East Jerusalem this week in a dispute over sanctions targeting Israeli settlements, four sources said. Israel on September 8 ordered Britain to close the East Jerusalem consulate within 30 days and remove its diplomats from the city, after Britain said it would impose a ban on trade of goods made in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.

For all the latest headlines, follow our Google News channel online or via the app. The 30-day deadline for Britain to close the consulate ends on Thursday, which will impact around 30 British diplomats who work there, along with their family members, the sources said. If the consulate is closed, Britain is likely to respond by expelling a similar number of Israeli diplomats from Israel’s embassy to the United Kingdom, the sources said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

The sources did not say how quickly Britain would act if the consulate closes. After Britain announced the sanctions, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar accused London of interfering in this month’s Israeli general election. The British foreign office did not respond to a request for comment. The Israeli foreign ministry declined to comment. An Israeli official said any action against Israel would be met with a response. The British sanctions announcement, and Israel’s response, marked a new low in the relationship between the once steadfast allies.

Britain has repeatedly criticized Israel over its actions in the war in Gaza and over Israeli settler attacks on Palestinians. Israel’s government has accused Britain’s governing Labour party of being hostile toward Israel. The British consulate, in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of East Jerusalem, handles the country’s relations with Palestinians in the city as well as in the West Bank and Gaza. It also provides consular services to Palestinians.

The consulate has been in Jerusalem for almost 200 years, long before the State of Israel was established in 1948. Reuters reported on Monday that Britain’s top national security adviser, Jonathan Powell, had quietly visited Israel last week in a bid to keep the consulate open but failed to reach an agreement. A fifth source said Britain was still hopeful an agreement could be reached. Two other sources said that Britain has asked European countries to raise the issue with Israel in hope of convincing the government to reverse its decision.

A spokesperson for Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar told Reuters on Monday the consulate would close on Thursday. In announcing the sanctions, Britain said that Israel’s actions were undermining the possibility of a two-state solution — the idea of a Palestinian state co-existing peacefully alongside Israel. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government openly rejects the idea of Palestinian statehood. Britain, which recognized the State of Palestine last year, cited Israeli government-backed projects to expand settlements and rising settler attacks targeting Palestinians in the West Bank.

The British sanctions are to take effect next year. France and Canada joined in announcing sanctions. Israel has not taken action against Paris or Ottawa. The incident highlighted growing frustration among Israel’s longtime allies over its settlements in the occupied West Bank, territory Israel captured in a 1967 war. Read more: UK security adviser visited Israel in bid to keep Jerusalem consulate open, sources say UK Green party adopts ‘Zionism is racism’ policy Advertisement Advertisement

Read the original article on english.alarabiya.net (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Al Arabiya runs Reuters wire copy on Britain's likely expulsion of Israeli diplomats if Israel shuts the East Jerusalem consulate. The report is attributed throughout and calls the West Bank occupied, but it presents the illegality of Israel's settlements as a view held by countries, set against Israel's dispute, rather than as the ruling of the International Court of Justice.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “Nearly all countries and all UN bodies view the settlements as illegal under international law, which Israel disputes.”

    Why this matters
    The words "view the settlements as illegal" and "which Israel disputes" make the settlements' illegality a matter of opinion held by governments and UN bodies, with Israel's denial set beside it as the other side.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the legality of the settlements to be an open dispute between most countries and Israel, with no court having settled it.
    The context
    The International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion holds the Israeli settlements illegal and the occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful. The article never mentions the court or its ruling.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful and the Israeli settlements illegal.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “court” and “ruling”.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The International Court of Justice ruled in July 2024 that Israel's settlements are illegal and its occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful. Israel rejects the ruling.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al Arabiya English

Everything we scored from Al Arabiya English