The Observer, on UK Politics, 25 October 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Households face possible 25% energy bill jump as winter bites

No framing issues found.

Energy bills for households in Great Britain could increase by as much as 25% in January, according to the latest analyst predictions for the energy price cap, as increasing wholesale gas prices raise the prospect of a further squeeze on household budgets this winter. Energy bills are likely to be front of mind in John Healey ’s budget on Wednesday . The chancellor and the prime minister, Andy Burnham, have talked repeatedly of their desire to give households and businesses some “breathing space”.

Energy prices, pushed higher by wars in the Middle East and Ukraine, are doing much of the squeezing. At prime minister’s questions, Burnham unexpectedly announced that he had asked the chancellor and energy secretary to “look at whether we can remove standing charges from gas bills and to report back… at the earliest opportunity”. Bills are split into a standing charge (a fixed daily amount paid by everyone, regardless of how much gas they use) and a variable fee, which depends on the amount of gas consumed.

Analysis from the Nesta thinktank estimated that removing the standing charge – and increasing the variable element of bills to compensate – would reduce bills for most households without costing the Treasury a penny. The typical household would save £22 a year, but savings would be bigger for homes that use little gas. Those that use a lot of gas would face higher bills. Jonathan Marshall, an economist at the Resolution Foundation thinktank, said that although bigger houses, which require more gas to heat, tend to be occupied by richer people , it would not be as simple as a transfer from rich to poor.

“Not all of those using lots of gas in the winter are on high incomes. A low-income family with a baby might need the heating on all of the time, for instance, and they could get stung by a removal of the standing charge,” he said. “There’s a danger of a change like this being rushed through.” Related articles: A bold budget this week will deliver the business-friendly socialism Britain badly needs The beer is going a little flat as tensions surface between No 10 and No 11 The budget could also include new support through the benefits system.

The warm home discount provides £150 towards the bills of means-tested benefit recipients in England, Scotland and Wales, regardless of how much energy they use. Doubling this to £300 would cost close to £1bn, if funded by the Treasury. “It wouldn’t be particularly well targeted at those who need it most,” said Marshall. “But it might be the best option that the government is capable of administering.” Alongside a package of short-term support measures, The Observer understands that the chancellor will announce plans for longer-term structural reforms of the energy system, aimed at reducing UK energy costs so they are closer to the European average.

Photograph by Leon Neal/Getty Images Budget Energy Cost of living crisis Energy bills Household bills

Read the original article on observer.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The Observer reports analyst forecasts of a rise of up to 25% in the January energy price cap, Andy Burnham's request to look at removing gas standing charges, and options for support in John Healey's budget. It attributes its forecasts and estimates to named sources and sets out who would lose as well as gain from the standing charge change. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “according to the latest analyst predictions for the energy price cap”

    The Observer ties the 25% figure to analyst forecasts rather than stating it as settled, and the headline keeps that uncertainty with the word "possible".

  • “Those that use a lot of gas would face higher bills.”

    The article does not stop at the Nesta saving figure. It tells the reader plainly who would pay more under the proposal.

  • “A low-income family with a baby might need the heating on all of the time, for instance, and they could get stung by a removal of the standing charge”

    The article gives space to an economist who tests the proposal, so the reader learns that heavy gas users are not all well off.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Observer

Everything we scored from The Observer