The Jewish Chronicle, on Iran, 29 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran TV halts coverage of Israeli election after Netanyahu rout fails to materialise

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

Iran state media coverage of Israel’s election stopped abruptly when early results dashed hopes of a rout for Benjamin Netanyahu – . As an overnight live broadcast began, had been celebrating the “total defeat” of the Israeli prime minister. But after exit poll projections then suggested the losses by the Likud-led coalition would not be as great as had been expected, the election largely disappeared from state television's news agenda for several hours.

When it came back, the focus shifted away from Netanyahu's performance to , along with the failure of either the government or opposition bloc to secure a parliamentary majority. Radio Tehran suggested that the political uncertainty could create opportunities for . The station claimed: “The current situation could lead to the overthrow of the Zionist regime and empower the axis of resistance, including in the Gaza Strip, for further operations against the Zionist occupation.”

Hardline Iranian newspaper Farhikhtegan describing the Knesset as the “House of Satan” and portraying its political deadlock as a sign of deeper instability. Fars News Agency, affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), welcomed what it called the victory of Arab parties, arguing that their increased parliamentary representation could weaken Israel from within. “Of course, the growing power of the Arabs also means a weakening of the Zionists internally, along with an increase in unrest,” the agency claimed.

Fars predicted that Israel could be forced to hold another election, warning of further political instability. “The continuation of this process would lead to instability, insecurity, and escalating conflicts, further intensifying tensions surrounding the next possible election,” it reported. The IRGC-affiliated newspaper Javan also praised the performance of Arab parties, suggesting their electoral gains could make them kingmakers in coalition negotiations.

“Arab citizens living in the occupied territories made a strong showing in support of their representatives. With an 80 per cent voter turnout, they secured more seats, which could turn them into the ‘kingmakers’ of a coalition government,” the newspaper wrote. Iranian state media have also sought to portray Israel's political uncertainty as evidence that another military attack against the Islamic Republic is unlikely, arguing that political turmoil would make further operations impossible.

The claims come amid speculation about the possibility of renewed joint Israel-US military operations against Iran. Speaking to the JC from Tehran, Amir, 29 said:“That's what we are hoping for. We are hoping Bibi will go ahead and, as he promised, finish the job he started. “Trump stopped him. Otherwise, he would have ended this months ago. But now Trump knows the regime in Iran is not trustworthy, so he needs to trust Bibi.”

Mahrokh, a middle-aged Iranian woman speaking to the JC from the city of Mashhad, said the regime's coverage of the Israeli election exposed a striking contradiction in its longstanding position towards the Jewish state. “The Iranian regime is now using exactly the same language against Israel that opposition media use against the regime itself. “The way they are promoting Netanyahu's opponents on Iranian television is unbelievable. They used to boycott anything related to Israeli domestic politics because they say they don't recognise Israel as a country.

But now they are following the news closely.” She said the regime was presenting Israel's political divisions as evidence of chaos, while ignoring the democratic process behind them. Mahrokh added: “They see the current situation as chaos, but in practice, this is what democracy looks like. As someone who follows politics closely, I can see that what is happening in Israel is democracy in action.” She stressed that she was not calling for war, but expressed frustration with the US president's approach to the Islamic Republic.

“I am not asking for any war, but what Trump did was hijack our revolution against the regime and then use it to make a nuclear deal with the regime. “At least Bibi won't do that, and he can convince Trump not to trust the Iranian regime.” The election has been closely watched against the backdrop of renewed calls by Iranian officials and state media figures for the Islamic Republic to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and develop nuclear weapons.

Iranians opposed to the regime fear acquiring a nuclear bomb would enable the Islamic Republic to stay in power for decades. “Bibi is the only person who can stop this. Otherwise, what was the point of attacking them in the first place and then just walking away?” Shahriar, an Iranian university student, told the JC from Tehran. “Over the past few days, Iranian state television has repeatedly broadcast interviews with pro-regime citizens calling on the Supreme Leader to give the order to produce nuclear bombs as soon as possible.

“We know that when this kind of propaganda starts, it means the regime is moving in that direction and trying to prepare the public for what is coming,” he said. “Can you imagine how bad things could get if the current balance of power in Israel and the US changes? It would be disastrous for Iran, for Israel, for America and for the entire world.”

Read the original article on thejc.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Jewish Chronicle reports how Iranian state media covered Israel's election, then builds a claim about what Iranian dissidents want on three interviews, one of whom says she does not want war. In its own voice it calls Iran's government 'the regime', turns Radio Tehran's words into 'militant groups' set to 'wreak havoc', and describes the Arab parties without ever saying the citizens behind them are Palestinian.

  1. Judges a whole people on a few

    Minor

    “Dissidents welcomed the possibility of the resumption of the campaign.”

    Why this matters
    The JC states as a plain fact that 'Dissidents', as a group, welcomed a renewed Israeli and US attack on Iran.
    The impression it gives
    Iran's opposition as a whole wants Israel and the US to resume bombing the country.
    The context
    The only basis in the article is three people quoted by first name. One of them, Mahrokh, says outright that she is not asking for war, so the article's own sources do not support the group claim.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Speaking to the JC from Tehran, Amir, 29 said”
    • Elsewhere in the article“an Iranian university student, told the JC”
    • Elsewhere in the article“I am not asking for any war”

    Show it in the article

    “as dissidents voiced the hope “Bibi can finish the job he started” in resuming war against the regime”

    Why this matters
    The opening sentence gives one interviewee's wish for renewed war to 'dissidents' in general.
    The impression it gives
    Iranian dissidents broadly are calling for Netanyahu to resume the war on Iran.
    The context
    The words come from one man, Amir, aged 29. The article offers no wider evidence about what Iranian dissidents think.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“We are hoping Bibi will go ahead”
    • Elsewhere in the article“She stressed that she was not calling for war”

    Show it in the article

  2. Erases a people's national identity

    Minor

    “the gains made by Arab parties”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the JC calls the parties 'Arab parties' and never says that the citizens who elected them are Palestinian.
    The impression it gives
    These voters are simply an Arab minority in Israel, with no connection to the Palestinian people.
    The context
    The word Palestinian does not appear anywhere in the article. The only description of these voters comes through Javan's quoted 'Arab citizens', so the outlet never itself names who these citizens are.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.
    • Elsewhere in the article“Arab citizens living in the occupied territories”

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “regime media”

    Why this matters
    The JC uses 'regime' in its own narration for Iran's state broadcasters.
    The impression it gives
    The outlet's own neutral description of Iran's government is 'the regime'.
    The context
    'Regime' is a verdict word. Elsewhere the article uses neutral terms such as 'Iran state media' and 'state television', so a plain description was available.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“disappeared from state television's news agenda”

    Show it in the article

    “resuming war against the regime”

    Why this matters
    The JC describes renewed Israeli and US attacks as war 'against the regime' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    Any renewed war would target only a government, not Iran and its people.
    The context
    The article itself later calls these 'joint Israel-US military operations against Iran', against the country.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“renewed joint Israel-US military operations against Iran”

    Show it in the article

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Iran-backed militant groups to wreak havoc”

    Why this matters
    The JC paraphrases Radio Tehran with its own words 'militant groups' and 'wreak havoc'.
    The impression it gives
    Radio Tehran spoke of armed groups causing chaos.
    The context
    The quoted broadcast speaks of the 'axis of resistance' and 'further operations against the Zionist occupation'. 'Wreak havoc' and 'militant' are the outlet's labels, not the station's words.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“empower the axis of resistance, including in the Gaza Strip”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jewish Chronicle

Everything we scored from The Jewish Chronicle