The Independent, on UK Politics, 23 October 2026

The Independent writes in its own voice that last month's borrowing was an "undershoot of expectations", one sentence after saying it rose by more than expected, and its own earlier report said the same. It adopts the ministers' term "red tape" as its own description of conveyancing rules, and it closes on unattributed concerns about capital gains tax. Only ministers speak: the opposition response reported the same morning by the BBC is absent.

6.0

Serious

out of 10

What we found

  1. Makes a false claim

    Serious

    “That undershoot of expectations”

    What the words do
    Describes last month's borrowing figure as coming in below expectations, one sentence after the article says it came in above them.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That borrowing was lower than forecast.
    What is actually the case
    The article's own previous sentence says borrowing was "rising by more than expected to £24.5 billion", and The Independent's earlier report on the same figure said it "rose by more than expected". An overshoot, not an undershoot.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Borrowing came in above forecast at £24.5 billion last month, tightening the constraints on the public finances before the Budget.

  2. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Minor

    “amid concerns it could hamper economic growth”

    What the words do
    Ends the article with an argument against raising capital gains tax, with no one named as holding the concern and nothing set against it.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That raising capital gains tax would damage growth, and that this is settled.
    What is actually the case
    The article names no source for the concern and gives no contrary view, while elsewhere it is willing to say who is expected to act, as when it reports that "Mr Healey is expected to increase bank taxes in response".

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Mr Healey is expected to increase bank taxes in response”

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “cutting red tape involved in buying and selling homes”

    What the words do
    Uses the deregulatory term "red tape" in The Independent's own voice for conveyancing requirements.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the rules being removed are needless by definition.
    What is actually the case
    The article identifies none of the rules and gives no assessment of them; "red tape" is the framing the ministers quoted in the piece use.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“we are cutting unnecessary bureaucracy and giving businesses the breathing space”

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The opposition's response to the announcement. The shadow chancellor said Labour had admitted red tape was hammering businesses and that its measures had made the situation worse. Without it a reader takes the announcement as unopposed.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Chancellor unveils £800 million savings for businesses by slashing pointless paperwork

Become an Independent member to bookmark this article Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today. Join today Already a member? Log in Businesses are in line for around £800 million in savings on paperwork under plans announced by the Chancellor, who wants to cut back on “form-filling and pointless paperwork”. The measures, designed to give businesses “breathing space”, have been unveiled ahead of John Healey’s first Budget next week . Mr Healey has said that he wants the Budget to ease cost pressures on both companies and households . The Treasury expects streamlined reporting requirements to save £290 million. Easing “duplicative reporting burdens” for asset managers is expected to save £105 million. open image in gallery Chancellor of the Exchequer John Healey ( PA Wire ) A further £116 million in savings is expected for businesses in the transaction chain from . Import tariffs that were paused across sectors including chemicals, plastics, automotive and food and beverages had been due to expire at the end of December. Instead, the suspensions are being extended for another year, covering more than 250 products. According to the Treasury, that extension is due to save up to £155 million. The measures form part of efforts to cut back the regulatory admin businesses are required to do by 25 per cent by the end of this Parliament. Any remaining cost-saving measures will be set out in the Budget. Mr Healey and Prime Minister Andy Burnham are due to meet small business leaders at No 10 North on Friday. open image in gallery Prime Minister Andy Burnham (left) and Chancellor of the Exchequer John Healey ( PA Wire ) Mr Burnham said: “If you run a business, you want to spend your time serving your customers, creating jobs and growing your firm, not filling in unnecessary forms. “It’s not right that pointless bureaucracy gets in the way of people working hard to build something that matters to their high street. “So we’re getting government off their backs and giving businesses the breathing space to grow. “Because when businesses succeed, they create good jobs, strengthen their communities and bring growth to every part of the country.” Mr Healey said: “British firms are fed up with form-filling and pointless paperwork that eats into valuable time and money when they simply want to get on with running their businesses. “That is why we are cutting unnecessary bureaucracy and giving businesses the breathing space they need to invest, innovate and create good jobs.” The plans come against a tight fiscal backdrop, with UK government borrowing rising by more than expected to £24.5 billion for last month. underscores the constraints in the public finances ahead of the Chancellor’s Budget. Higher borrowing costs are weighing down on fiscal headroom, and Mr Healey is expected to increase bank taxes in response. He has rejected calls to hike capital gains tax at the Budget, .

Read the original article on independent.co.uk (opens in a new tab)

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Independent

  1. 24 OctAndy Burnham is a magician: he hasn’t really done anything and yet he is popular0.0
  2. 23 OctPensioners to lose £1,600 under Labour’s plans to scrap triple lock, new analysis shows3.0
  3. 23 OctBusinesses to save £800m on paperwork under Healey's new plan3.0
  4. 23 OctDavid Carrick rape victim calls for Met police chief to resign after legal claim3.0
  5. 23 OctPrepare for ‘state-sponsored terrorism’ and cyber attacks to cause food shortages, Wes Streeting warns3.0

Everything we scored from The Independent