The Jewish Chronicle, on Gaza, 29 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

call for more sanctions against Israel over

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

A group of parliamentarians have urged Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband to impose further sanctions on Israel over on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza. In a letter of 28th October, coordinated by the Council for Arab-British Understanding (Caabu) and the Britain-Palestine Project, 75 MPs and peers called on the government to use newly conferred sanctions powers to target those they say are obstructing the flow of food, medicine and other vital supplies.

The signatories include former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, former Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell, Lib Dem foreign affairs spokesperson Layla Moran and the Conservatives’ Baroness Wars. The letter called for the first sanctions to be announced immediately with a view to further action before winter sets in. "You correctly stated that the Israeli authorities had routinely blocked life-saving aid and access into Gaza," they wrote, .

Israel has denied deliberately preventing aid from going into the Strip, saying that more than sufficient supplies have reached the territory and that select restrictions have related to security issues. “The powers now exist. We urge you to use them now, starting with those who have been responsible for denying and obstructing life-saving aid to the Palestinians in Gaza,” the letter went on. It also called for sanctions to be imposed on groups accused of blocking, attacking or looting aid convoys and on members of Hamas or other armed groups who are found to have diverted or otherwise interfered with assistance for the civilian population.

One of the organisations mentioned is Tzav 9, an Israeli far-right activist group which the letter stated has been sanctioned by the EU since July 2024 for repeatedly obstructing aid trucks (delivering food, water and fuel) into Gaza. The signatories suggested the UK use an accelerated route to designate individuals or entities already subject to sanctions by other countries for similar behaviour. In particular, they raised concerns about Israel's decision to cancel the licences of 37 international NGOs from January 2026.

Israeli authorities said the groups have refused to comply with new rules requiring them to disclose the personal details of their Palestinian staff. Among them were Médecins Sans Frontières, Oxfam and the Norwegian Refugee Council. The letter also called on the UK to press Israel to allow in further food, medical supplies, fuel, shelter materials, drainage equipment and to provide further funding for the humanitarian operations. It cautioned that displaced Palestinians will be at risk from winter flooding, with particular reference to the risk of sewage-contaminated water and the risk of shelter supplies being compromised.

The sanctions regime was introduced via the Global Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law Sanctions Regulations 2026, which came into force on October 15. The regulations give the power to designate individuals who are involved in serious violations of international humanitarian law or in the obstruction of humanitarian assistance. The letter concluded by asserting that the effectiveness of the new powers should be judged by whether Palestinian families have access to food, clean water and adequate shelter rather than by the number of people that are sanctioned.

It said sanctions, humanitarian access and funding must work in tandem to ensure that assistance actually gets to the civilians in Gaza. The full list of signatories includes MPs from Labour, the Lib Dems, the Greens, Plaid Cymru, the SNP and the independents, plus peers and two bishops of the Church of England.

Read the original article on thejc.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Jewish Chronicle reports a cross-party letter urging UK sanctions over the obstruction of aid to Gaza, but it casts doubt on aid restrictions that its own article confirms. The headline puts 'Gaza aid restrictions' in scare quotes, and the body calls them 'alleged', even though Israel itself admits 'select restrictions' and the article reports Israel cancelling the licences of 37 aid groups. The headline also gives a broad cross-party group a single partisan label.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “‘Gaza aid restrictions’”

    Why this matters
    The headline puts 'Gaza aid restrictions' in quotation marks. Nobody in the article says those words. The marks make the restrictions read as a disputed claim held only by the MPs.
    The impression it gives
    That restrictions on aid entering Gaza are a contested allegation, and possibly not real.
    The context
    The body confirms the restrictions. Israel itself says 'select restrictions have related to security issues'. The article reports Israel's decision to cancel the licences of 37 international NGOs. The UK Foreign Office had already stated that Israeli authorities routinely blocked aid.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“select restrictions have related to security issues”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Israel's decision to cancel the licences of 37 international NGOs”
    • Elsewhere in the article“the Israeli authorities had routinely blocked life-saving aid and access into Gaza”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Cross-party MPs and peers call for sanctions over Israel's restrictions on aid to Gaza

  2. Casts doubt on what its own article confirms

    Serious

    “alleged restrictions”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the JC calls the restrictions on aid entering Gaza 'alleged'.
    The impression it gives
    That it is unproven whether Israel restricts aid into Gaza at all.
    The context
    Israel's own response in the article admits restrictions and only disputes that they are deliberate obstruction. The article also reports Israel cancelling the licences of 37 aid groups, including Médecins Sans Frontières and Oxfam. What is contested is Israel's reason for the restrictions, not whether they exist.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“select restrictions have related to security issues”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Médecins Sans Frontières, Oxfam and the Norwegian Refugee Council”

    Show it in the article

    “referring to claims outlined in the Foreign Office’s existing sanctions”

    Why this matters
    The JC turns a finding the UK Foreign Office set out in its own sanctions into 'claims'.
    The impression it gives
    That the British government has only floated an accusation about aid blocking.
    The context
    The quoted letter says the Foreign Secretary 'correctly stated' that Israeli authorities routinely blocked aid. That statement already underpins existing UK sanctions. Israel's reply in the next sentence concedes restrictions.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“select restrictions have related to security issues”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    A group of parliamentarians have urged Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband to impose further sanctions on Israel over its restrictions on aid entering Gaza, which the Foreign Office has said routinely blocked life-saving aid; Israel says the restrictions relate to security.

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Pro-Palestine MPs”

    Why this matters
    The headline tags the signatories with the single partisan label 'Pro-Palestine MPs'.
    The impression it gives
    That a narrow, one-sided activist bloc of MPs wrote the letter.
    The context
    The article says the 75 signatories span Labour, the Lib Dems, the Greens, Plaid Cymru, the SNP, a Conservative peer and two Church of England bishops. The letter also seeks sanctions on members of Hamas who divert aid.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“plus peers and two bishops of the Church of England”
    • Elsewhere in the article“members of Hamas or other armed groups”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jewish Chronicle

Everything we scored from The Jewish Chronicle