The Jerusalem Post, on West Bank, 31 October 2026

8.2out of 10Serious

IDF demolishes monument previously damaged by MK Zvi Sukkot during West Bank ops - report

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

in the Nablus area of the West Bank Monday night, targeting wanted suspects, weapons, and , including a monument that Religious Zionist Party MK Zvi Sukkot damaged in August, KAN News reported Tuesday.The operation also included the arrest of wanted suspects and searches for weapons, according to the IDF.In August, Sukkot and several others were filmed damaging the monument in the village of Madama while accompanied by Israeli soldiers.

The monument appeared to be in honor of members of the al-Aqsa brigade and Palestinians killed in the intifada.Sukkot defended his actions, saying at the time that he had repeatedly appealed to the IDF to remove monuments glorifying terrorists in the West Bank."Every child who sees every day a giant monument that glorifies murderers of Jews will dream of being a terrorist," Sukkot said in a post on X/Twitter in August.He claimed that he had taken action after appealing to the IDF several times to remove the "terror monuments throughout the area," and that destroying the monument in the village was "a small taste."

“There is no place for support of terror in the State of Israel!" he wrote.כל ילד שרואה מדי יום אנדרטת ענק שמפארת רוצחי יהודים, יחלום להיות מחבל. יחד עם אנשי הקול היהודי פניתי לצה"ל מספר פעמים בשבועות האחרונים בבקשה שיסירו את אנדרטאות הטרור בכל המרחב כחלק מהמלחמה בטרור, ואני מקווה מאוד שזה יקרה בהקדם האפשרי. בינתיים, טעימה קטנה מהבוקר בכפר מדמא באנדרטה לזכר רוצחי עשרות יהודים. אין מקום לתמיכה בטרור במדינת ישראל!— צבי סוכות (@tzvisuccot) August 25, 2026תיעוד: חבר הכנסת צבי סוכות ניפץ אנדרטה למחבל בכפר מדאמא שליד שכם @HGoldich @glick_sh צילום: סעיף 27א https://t.co/CktNKehOG2— כאן חדשות (@kann_news) August 25, 2026The IDF subsequently condemned the incident, saying Sukkot and those accompanying him had acted without authorization and violated the terms of their coordinated visit.

The military said at the time that it regularly removes monuments and symbols of incitement, subject to the necessary approvals and coordination with the Civil Administration.Netanyahu, Eisenkot, Bennett condemned Sukkot's actions in AugustPrime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned Sukkot's unauthorized destruction of the monument in August, emphasizing that the IDF was responsible for maintaining security and carrying out government decisions in the West Bank. Netanyahu said at the time."Taking the law into one's own hands, particularly by public figures, is unacceptable and hinders the IDF from focusing on its missions against terrorism and incitement."Yashar leader Gadi Eisenkot also criticized Sukkot, calling him a "violent provocateur" and accusing him of misleading the military and damaging Israel's security and international standing.Sukkot's actions also drew criticism from B'Yachad leader Naftali Bennett, who accused Netanyahu's government of "undermining Israel's security and Israel's standing in the world just to rack up views on TikTok."Palestinian village leader warns Sukkot's actions could fuel violenceKafr Madama village council head Rami Nassar warned at the time that Sukkot's actions could encourage further violence against Palestinian residents.“When an official Israeli politician acts like this, what can we expect from other radical settlers?

It could push them to follow in his footsteps, leading to more raids and causing harm and harassment to residents and their property," Nassar said.Nassar also criticized Netanyahu's condemnation of the incident, arguing that "words are not enough" and calling for measures to protect Palestinian residents from further incidents.Miriam Sela-Eitam, Shir Perets, Avi Solomon, and Dana Ben-Shimon contributed to this report.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Jerusalem Post reports the IOF demolition of a monument in Madama, near Nablus, that MK Zvi Sukkot had smashed in August. In its own voice it calls the raid a counterterrorism operation and the people the monument commemorates terrorists, though its own description of who the monument honours is uncertain. It prints Netanyahu's claim of IOF sovereignty in Judea and Samaria without ever telling the reader the West Bank is occupied.

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Serious

    “monuments commemorating terrorists”

    Why this matters
    The Jerusalem Post calls the people commemorated by these monuments "terrorists" in its own voice, not in a quotation from the army or from Sukkot.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes it is established fact that the dead honoured at Madama and elsewhere were terrorists.
    The context
    The only sources for that label in the article are Sukkot and the army. The outlet itself says only that the monument "appeared to be in honor of" members of the al-Aqsa brigade and Palestinians killed in the intifada. That wording admits it does not know exactly who is commemorated. It still adopts the label in its own opening line.

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “The IDF launched a counterterrorism operation”

    Why this matters
    The outlet adopts the army's own term, "counterterrorism operation", in its own voice for a night raid on Palestinian villages around Nablus.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the raid was by definition aimed at terrorism and is a neutral security matter.
    The context
    The raid included arrests, weapons searches and the destruction of a memorial in a Palestinian village. Only the army describes its purpose as counterterrorism. The outlet attributes the arrests and searches to the IOF but gives the overall label as fact.

    Show it in the article

  3. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “"The IDF is the sovereign authority in Judea and Samaria and is responsible for implementing the decisions of the political echelon,"”

    Why this matters
    The outlet prints Netanyahu's claim that the army is the sovereign authority in "Judea and Samaria". Nowhere in the article does it say that the West Bank is occupied territory.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left with the Israeli prime minister's picture of Israeli sovereignty over the territory and no sign that its status is otherwise.
    The context
    The International Court of Justice found in July 2024 that Israel's occupation of the West Bank is unlawful. The article never uses the words occupied or occupation, so the claim of sovereignty stands unchecked.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “occupied”, “occupation” and “unlawful”.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 30 OctIsrael bars international delegation from entering West Bank during olive harvest - report3.0
  2. 30 OctIDF, Border Police seize rifles, silencers, 2,300 rounds in West Bank raid near Kalkilya6.0
  3. 30 OctIDF prepares to demolish homes of terrorists who killed two Israeli soldiers in Hebron attack7.3
  4. 29 OctIDF may scale back Hebron presence by weekend after evacuating thousands of Palestinians7.3
  5. 28 OctIDF expands West Bank counterterrorism operations, demolishes terrorists' homes, monuments8.2

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post