ABC News (US), on Iran, 22 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

US and Israel drawing up plans to resume attacks on Iran post-election, sources say

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

The Israeli Defense Forces and the United States military have drawn up plans to renew joint strikes on Iran in the coming weeks, according to two Israeli sources familiar with the plans. The Israeli sources said the strikes would almost certainly take place after the U.S. midterm elections, citing President Donald Trump’s reluctance to further destabilize oil markets in the final days of the campaign. The White House said Thursday that the U.S. will not resume attacks on Iran before the Nov. 3 midterm elections.

U.S. Navy Command Master Chief John Shubert, assigned to Airborne Command and Control Squadron (VAW) 115, conducts leadership training aboard Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, Oct. 20, 2026. US Navy “The United States will not be attacking Iran at any time prior to the midterm elections,” White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement to ABC News. Related Iran live updates

The New York Times was first to report on the planning. Asked about the Times' reporting, a White House official said the administration does not comment on "sensitive military plans that may or may not exist." The official added that Trump "keeps all options on the table" to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. The Pentagon declined to comment. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is firmly in favor of renewed action against Iran, but both sources said the decision for joint strikes to resume is "only for Trump to decide."

One Israeli source did not rule out Israel striking unilaterally should the U.S. choose not to participate, but added Israel would still require U.S. consent. Trump has repeatedly said that he would restart the war after the midterm elections and has threatened to "end" it after the midterms. He gave a somewhat conflicting answer on the status of negotiations with Iran when asked Wednesday night, initially saying talks are ongoing "a little bit," but moments later saying "I think we're not negotiating."

"A little bit, but we'll see what happens," Trump said, when asked for an update on negotiations. A U.S. sailor signals an F-35C Lightning II assigned to Strike Fighter Squadron 147 as it takes off from the flight deck of Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS George Washington Oct. 7, 2026. US Navy Asked if he is "over" negotiating with Iran, Trump responded, "No, I think we're not negotiating with -- We are going to have something one way or the other that'll happen fairly soon."

"Most people seem to think it's after the election, and we're going to see what happens," he added. Popular Reads Amy Acton campaign slams Ramaswamy over controversial ad featuring estranged mother 2 days ago Man hops onto moving school bus when he sees driver in distress 16 hours ago Bend, Oregon, shooting: Suspect ID'd, had attended elementary school, police say Oct 16 The plans to renew joint strikes were discussed during Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's unannounced visit to Israel earlier this week, according to one Israeli source, who added that new intelligence was shared between both sides.

New strikes would aim to further erode Iran's economy and build on the ongoing U.S. blockade, with targets to include petrochemical facilities crucial to Iran's oil industry, one of the sources said. The source added that striking Iranian nuclear facilities, such as those at Pickaxe Mountain, is also part of the new plans, but added there are no plans to strike civilian infrastructure like power plants. The source emphasized that regime change in Iran, and not a negotiated deal, is the Israeli government's top goal.

"The only question is the timing," they said. The U.S. military has been repositioning personnel at U.S. military bases in the Middle East, a source familiar with the matter told ABC News. Smoke and flames rise from King Khalid Airport, after Yemen's Iran-backed Houthis said they attacked the airport, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, October 8, 2026, in this screengrab obtained from a social media video. Social Media via Reuters The repositioning of forces is similar to what occurred quietly prior to the start of the war with Iran in February, according to the source.

Asked for comment on an NBC report about the reduction of military and diplomatic personnel in the region, CENTCOM spokesman Capt. Tim Hawkins said in a statement: "We regularly move U.S. service members and assets to optimize mission readiness. We do not discuss related movements for operational security reasons. U.S. forces remain vigilant and ready to protect American personnel and interests across the region." Earlier Wednesday, the State Department ordered the departure of non-essential personnel and family members in Saudi Arabia -- a decision officials say is a direct response to the risk posed by Iranian-backed Houthi militants, who have attacked Saudi oil infrastructure and airports on Saudi Arabia from Yemen.

There have been much smaller posture adjustments at several other embassies in the Middle East -- changes officials say are also linked to the Houthi threat and other matters not connected to any plan to resume combat against Iran. ABC News' Nick Kerr and Emily Chang contributed to this report.

Read the original article on abcnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

ABC News reports, on the word of two Israeli sources and with White House comment, that the US and Israel have drawn up plans to resume strikes on Iran after the US midterms. The attribution is careful throughout, but Israeli and US voices fill the piece and ABC never gives Iran's response, which other outlets carried.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “"Hunting season is open as soon as the elections end and it's obvious that they're not going to wait long," one Israeli source said.”

    Why this matters
    ABC gives an anonymous Israeli source a vivid line about "hunting season" on Iran. Israeli sources, the White House, the Pentagon, CENTCOM and Trump speak across the article, and no Iranian official is quoted or even said to have been asked.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away with the planned strikes described only by the people planning them, as if Iran had nothing to say about being the target.
    The context
    Other outlets covering the same report carried Iran's stated response: Iranian officials have threatened that any renewed attack would bring a broader response. ABC never mentions Tehran's position.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “according to two Israeli sources familiar with the plans”

    ABC attributes the central claim to its sources in the first sentence rather than stating the plans as established fact, and the headline keeps that attribution with "sources say".

  • “the administration does not comment on "sensitive military plans that may or may not exist."”

    ABC reports the White House's non-denial in its own words, letting the reader see what was and was not denied.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from ABC News (US)

  1. 26 OctDelegations meet in Iran with Mideast region on edge over potential for renewed fighting3.0
  2. 25 OctIranians fear a possible return to all-out war as US and Israeli elections approach3.0
  3. 25 OctIran says messages are still being passed to the US amid war concerns, and other Mideast news3.0
  4. 24 OctIran remains open to talks with US under Pakistan-brokered deal, envoy says0.0
  5. 20 Oct2 men rearrested in UK on suspicion of assisting Iran over suspected plot at a US-run air base0.0

Everything we scored from ABC News (US)