The Telegraph, on UK Politics, 8 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Jump to content

Sections

UK Edition

Subscribe now

Log in Login icon

Follow us on:

More from The Telegraph

Nick Gutteridge Chief Political Correspondent. Martin Evans Crime Editor. Neil Johnston

Published 04 August 2024 11:43pm BST

Save

This feature is available for registered users. Please register or log in to continue

RegisterLog in

Comment speech bubble icon 1362

Share article

Log in or

Subscribe

Copy link

Gift this article free

Gift article

Give full access to this article, free time. You have 15 articles left to gift, this month.

Log in or

Subscribe

Copy link

Add us as preferred source

!Asian men join the disturbance in Bolton on Sunday

Asian men join the disturbance in Bolton on Sunday Credit: Phil Taylor / SWNS

Nick Gutteridge Chief Political Correspondent. Martin Evans Crime Editor. Neil Johnston

Published 04 August 2024 11:43pm BST

Violent clashes broke out between far-Right rioters and Muslim counter-protesters on Sunday in a sixth day of unrest on Britain’s streets.

The disorder that has spread since the Southport killings showed no sign of abating over the weekend .

In Rotherham, a hotel used to house asylum seekers was set ablaze, and .

In Bolton, .

A mob in Middlesbrough shouted “smash the p—s” and “there ain’t no black in the Union Jack” while targeting the homes of migrants, while footage on social media from elsewhere in the city appeared to show groups of Asian men attacking white men.

In an emergency address from Downing Street, Sir Keir Starmer warned the rioters would regret taking part and vowed to do “whatever it takes to bring these thugs to justice as quickly as possible”.

!Police stand guard against counter-protesters

Police stand guard against counter-protesters Credit: Reuters/Belinda Jiao

He said: “The police will be making arrests. Individuals will be held on remand. Charges will follow. And convictions will follow.

“I guarantee you will regret taking part in this disorder. Whether directly or those whipping up this action online, and then running away themselves.”

He added: “This is not protest. I won’t shy away from calling this what it is – far-Right thuggery.”

The Prime Minister was warned not to be “selective” in his response to the groups involved in the disorder.

Robert Jenrick, a frontrunner to become the next Tory leader, said the Prime Minister must not show any “squeamishness or selectivity” in tackling all those responsible.

He said the streets should be flooded with tens of thousands of police, with all leave cancelled and officers diverted from unaffected areas to riot hotspots.

“The ringleaders should be arrested, swiftly prosecuted and jailed for the longest possible time,” the former immigration minister told The Telegraph.

“Groups that gather in town or city centres that become violent must be immediately dispersed, with violent thugs arrested.

“If force is needed to achieve this, it should be used. There must be no squeamishness or selectivity whatsoever to robust law enforcement.”

‘Law breaking is not the answer’

Nadhim Zahawi, the former Chancellor, also warned that there must be zero tolerance for anyone taking part in riots, including those “taking matters into their own hands”.

He said: “There needs to be a clear, consistent message for all those rioting, even if they think they are ‘taking matters into their own hands’; law breaking is not the answer and there must be a zero tolerance response.

“The Government needs to realise that there is legitimate frustration and pain felt in communities across the country, with recent murders and other violence becoming emblematic of people feeling that their society is becoming unrecognisable. But the violence must be punished.

“Similarly, the Government needs to say to those thugs who hijack Islam that it will not be tolerant of intolerance. If you settle in Britain like I did, you respect its values and traditions, integrate and be proud of this country, otherwise you must go somewhere else.”

Protests broke out in the wake of the Southport killings after false information was spread online that the suspect was an asylum seeker.

On Sunday, around 700 rioters descended on the Holiday Inn Express in Rotherham, which has previously been used to house asylum seekers.

!tmg.video.placeholder.alt Bm2riVkJp38

After smashing several ground floor windows, the attackers then attempted to set the hotel on fire, torching bins and then using them to blockade the exits.

Mosques have been targeted on previous days of the unrest and the Home Office on Sunday announced that extra police and security forces will be deployed to protect mosques after they were targeted by far-Right rioters.

Amid escalating community tensions, in Bolton between anti-immigration protesters and Muslim counter demonstrators.

By early afternoon the counter-protesters, who were mostly Asian and many in Muslim dress, .

Footage on social media also appeared to show groups of Asian men attacking white males in Middlesbrough.

!Counter-protesters outnumbered the anti-immigration protest by two to one

Counter-protesters outnumbered the anti-immigration protest by two to one Credit: Belinda Jiao

A reporter for Channel 4 News said groups of Asian and white men were on the streets of the town “looking for trouble”.

Tommy Robinson, who is the subject of an arrest warrant issued by a judge after failing to turn up to court last Monday, was reported to be stoking the riots through his social media posts while on holiday in Cyprus. He denies encouraging or orchestrating violence.

Sir Keir is under increasing pressure to bring the violence under control.

In his statement on Sunday, he opened the door to tougher prison sentences for rioters and announced suspects will be held on remand and locked up immediately after being charged, mirroring action to tackle the 2011 riots when he was Director of Public Prosecutions.

The Prime Minister will lead a meeting of the Government’s emergency Cobra committee on Monday alongside Cabinet ministers and senior police figures.

However doubts have been raised over whether there are enough jail places available for Sir Keir to mount a 2011-style response to the unrest.

Labour inherited a system that is running at almost full capacity, with only around 700 spaces available in male prisons around the country.

Around 150 arrests have been made across England since Saturday evening, the National Police Chiefs’ Council said, with that number expected to rise.

Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, on Sunday night warned rioters they would face a “reckoning” and that police have the Government’s backing to take the “strongest possible action”.

Writing in The Times, she said: “Make no mistake, there will be a reckoning for the individuals who took part in this violence, those who whipped them up on social media and in online chat forums and those who have felt emboldened by this moment to stir up racial hatred.”

Cassia Rowland, a researcher at the Institute for Government, said locking up all the rioters was “not an option” unless more prisoners are released.

She said: “The situation in prisons is desperate. We simply don’t have the prison spaces available for mass arrests like we saw in 2011.”

The Government has announced that, as of Sept 10, thousands of prisoners will be freed when they have served 40pc of their sentence to free up cells.

But that date has been written into law, meaning the scheme could only be brought forward if Parliament were recalled from recess to amend the legislation.

Government sources insisted that internal modelling of prisoner numbers showed there would be enough space to lock up all the rioters.

No 10 was forced to scotch rumours that Sir Keir was planning to go on holiday on Monday insisting he would be working at Downing Street all week.

The Prime Minister is now facing demands to recall Parliament so that MPs can debate his response, as Lord Cameron did at the same point during the 2011 unrest.

Sir Iain Duncan Smith, a former Tory leader, added that Sir Keir “needs to bring people back to explain what he’s doing”.

Meanwhile officials were forced to dampen down speculation they could call the Army in if police forces are stretched to breaking point in the coming days.

Humza Yousaf, a former Scottish first minister, and Tobias Ellwood, an ex-Armed Forces minister, were among those urging Sir Keir to use the military.

Mr Yousaf warned the UK was experiencing “far-Right race riots” which amounted to “pogroms against the Muslim community, against people of colour”.

Neil Basu, a former assistant commissioner at Scotland Yard, said the riots had made him feel afraid to be black for the first time in decades.

He said: “I was born a few weeks before Enoch Powell made a speech that changed my parents’ lives. I am the son of immigrants and I am not a white person.

“I spent 30 years as a police officer feeling pretty secure in my ability to handle myself, I don’t feel like that this week and that is a terrible thing for a man in his 57th year to say.

“But I remember growing up in the 1970s, I watched the National Front march down streets, and this feels very much like that.”

Join the conversation

Show 1362 comments

The Telegraph values your comments but kindly requests all posts are on topic, constructive and respectful. Please review our commenting policy.

Copy link

The Telegraph values your comments but kindly requests all posts are on topic, constructive and respectful. Please review our commenting policy.

Related Topics

Riots,

Rotherham,

Protests,

Middlesbrough,

Keir Starmer

License this content

You need to be a subscriber to join the conversation. Find out more here.

Log In Subscribe

Advertisement

More stories

More from News

Nandy accused of insulting veterans with Remembrance Sunday ‘EU pitch’

!The Conservatives accused Lisa Nandy of suggesting that Brexit had damaged the legacy of peace forged by Britain's Second World War veterans

Fogbound M20 closed after 30-vehicle crash

!Cars stationary, with glowing lights, on a foggy road at night, from a high angle

Police apologise to Markle’s son after naming him ‘person of interest’

!Thomas markle jr

* Farage: We’re the only country with clean hands over slavery

!Nigel Farage

More from The Telegraph

Read the original article on telegraph.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Telegraph headlines far-right rioting against mosques, an asylum hotel and migrants' homes as a clash between the far right and 'Muslims', naming a whole religious community as a rioting side when its own body calls them counter-protesters. In places it also uses softer words, calling the same far-right crowd 'anti-immigration protesters' and the violence 'community tensions' and 'scuffles'.

  1. Tells the event as something else

    Serious

    “Far Right and Muslims clash in fresh riots”

    Why this matters
    The headline sets 'Far Right' and 'Muslims' side by side as two parties to a riot. It drops the word 'counter-protesters' that the body uses and names a whole religious community as a rioting side.
    The impression it gives
    That the riots were a fight between the far right and Muslims as such, two equal sides clashing.
    The context
    The Telegraph's own body reports far-right rioters setting an asylum hotel ablaze, targeting migrants' homes and attacking mosques, so that the Home Office had to send police to protect mosques. The Muslims it mentions were counter-protesters responding to that.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“extra police and security forces will be deployed to protect mosques”
    • Elsewhere in the article“far-Right rioters and Muslim counter-protesters”
    • Elsewhere in the article“while targeting the homes of migrants”

    Show it in the article

    “Muslim groups shouting “Allahu Akbar” clashed with far-Right rioters”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph identifies the Bolton counter-protesters by religion and by a religious cry, and makes them the subject of the clash. It reports no chant from the far-right side in Bolton.
    The impression it gives
    That the Bolton confrontation was a religious one, started or driven by Muslim groups.
    The context
    The article itself says the far-right unrest had targeted mosques on previous days and calls the Bolton side counter demonstrators, people responding to an anti-immigration gathering.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“after they were targeted by far-Right rioters”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Muslim counter demonstrators”

    Show it in the article

  2. Softens the far right

    Minor

    “another in Tamworth was targeted by anti-immigration protesters”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph calls the people who targeted an asylum hotel 'anti-immigration protesters', a softer name than the one it uses elsewhere.
    The impression it gives
    That the Tamworth attack was the work of protesters with a policy grievance about immigration.
    The context
    In the same article the outlet calls the unrest far-Right rioting, and the Prime Minister it quotes calls it far-Right thuggery, not protest.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“after they were targeted by far-Right rioters”
    • Elsewhere in the article“This is not protest.”

    Show it in the article

    “outnumbered the anti-immigration protest by two to one”

    Why this matters
    For the Bolton gathering the Telegraph switches to 'the anti-immigration protest', after calling the same people far-Right rioters three paragraphs earlier.
    The impression it gives
    That the Muslim crowd faced an ordinary protest about immigration.
    The context
    The outlet's own account of the same Bolton event says Muslim groups clashed with far-Right rioters.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“clashed with far-Right rioters”

    Show it in the article

  3. Sanitises violence or disorder

    Minor

    “amid escalating community tensions”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph describes the spread of the disorder as 'community tensions', a mutual strain between communities.
    The impression it gives
    That two communities were in growing friction, rather than that one side was attacking migrants, Muslims and asylum hotels.
    The context
    The article reports a mob of around 700 trying to burn a hotel housing asylum seekers with the exits blockaded, mosques targeted, and a mob chanting racist slurs while targeting migrants' homes.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the attackers then attempted to set the hotel on fire”
    • Elsewhere in the article“while targeting the homes of migrants”

    Show it in the article

    “there were scuffles on the town’s streets”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph calls the Bolton events 'scuffles', after its lede called them violent clashes.
    The impression it gives
    That Bolton saw only minor pushing and shoving.
    The context
    The same article's lede describes the events as violent clashes involving far-Right rioters.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Violent clashes broke out between far-Right rioters”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Telegraph

  1. 2 NovBan Chinese cars that can spy on Britain, Andy Burnham urged0.0
  2. 2 NovBurnham has dragged the King into party-political slavery debate6.0
  3. 2 NovAngela Rayner on track to deliver fewer homes than the Tories3.0
  4. 2 NovHow Britain walked straight into the slavery trap0.0
  5. 2 NovRestore Britain party’s links to Europe’s far-Right0.0

Everything we scored from The Telegraph