Daily Mail, on UK Politics, 24 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

John Healey plans to send 2,000 anti-fraud experts into Jobcentres in bid to claw back £1.4billion from benefits cheats - amid warnings welfare bill could soar by £5.5billion

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

John Healey is planning to send 2,000 anti-fraud experts into Jobcentres in a bid to crack down on benefits cheats and save taxpayers £1.4billion. The Chancellor is expected to announce at the Budget that fraud-busting officials will team up with Work Coaches to spot suspicious Universal Credit claims early. Tougher checks on claims abroad are also expected, targeting fraudsters who fail to report they have left the country in order to keep payments flowing.

and claim thousands of pounds. One cheat pocketed nearly £39,000 from taxpayers while living in Zimbabwe and collecting rent from a UK property. Another Universal Credit claimant from the Midlands submitted an application for support with childcare costs – but listed their address as a derelict building in the local area.

A Treasury spokesman said: 'We need to make the most of every pound of taxpayers' money and cut fraud to ensure the welfare system is fair and sustainable. John Healey is planning to send 2,000 anti-fraud experts into job centres in a bid to crack down on benefits cheats and save taxpayers £1.4 billion 'At the Budget, we're rooting out those who abuse the welfare system, while protecting those who need it most.' Britain's benefits bill is set to soar by £5.5billion next year – significantly more than forecast – as Andy Burnham rejects 'crude' cuts to welfare spending.

An analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies found that total spending on welfare would rise by around £5.5billion in 2027. That is as much as £2.2billion more than the Treasury has budgeted for, based on Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecasts. Many benefits increase every April in line with the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation rate from the previous September. Official figures published on Wednesday showed the CPI inflation rate for September this year was 3.5 per cent, more than the OBR forecast of 2.3 per cent across 2026.

This is the highest rate in almost a year and the sharp rise – from 3.1 per cent in August – was blamed on soaring fuel costs due to the Iran war. The Prime Minister has insisted he will 'bring the welfare budget down', but Mr Burnham has ruled out 'crude' cuts to benefits in doing so. The Government is expected to soon publish two reports – on youth unemployment and disability benefits – before coming forward with welfare reforms next year.

But ministers are braced for the high upfront costs of measures to tackle youth inactivity to exceed planned cuts to benefits for the next two years, until 2029. It means Britain's benefits bill – which is estimated to currently stand at around £160billion – could continue rising into the 2030s. Helen Whately, the Tory shadow work and pensions secretary, said: 'Higher inflation means higher benefit bills, piling more pressure on the public finances while families and businesses are already struggling with rising costs. 'Labour's tax rises and red tape are driving up costs for businesses.

At the same time, the Government are handing out billions more in welfare, leaving hardworking taxpayers to foot the bill.'

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Daily Mail reports a planned Budget crackdown on benefit fraud and an IFS forecast that the welfare bill will rise by £5.5billion. In its own voice it calls claimants "benefits scroungers" on the strength of two anecdotes. It also states as fact that checks not yet announced will expose bogus claims and protect public money.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Benefits scroungers have been altering their documents to beat the system”

    Why this matters
    The Daily Mail uses the word "scroungers" in its own voice and states as general fact that they have been altering documents, with no source and no figure for how many.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away believing document fraud by a class of "scroungers" is widespread and established.
    The context
    The article backs this only with two anecdotes, the Zimbabwe case and the derelict address case, and gives no source or scale for the fraud it describes. "Scroungers" is the paper's verdict, not a finding reported by anyone quoted.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“One cheat pocketed nearly £39,000”
    • Elsewhere in the article“listed their address as a derelict building”

    Show it in the article

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “New data-driven checks will identify potential breaches of benefit travel rules, exposing bogus claims and protecting public money.”

    Why this matters
    The Daily Mail states in its own voice that the new checks will expose bogus claims and protect public money.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that the measures will work as described.
    The context
    This is the government's description of a policy not yet announced. The article elsewhere says the measures are only "expected" at the Budget, and the claims about protecting public money come from a Treasury spokesman.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The Chancellor is expected to announce at the Budget”
    • Elsewhere in the article“cut fraud to ensure the welfare system is fair and sustainable”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “An analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies found that total spending on welfare would rise by around £5.5billion in 2027.”

    It attributes the headline forecast to a named source and gives the year it covers.

  • “Many benefits increase every April in line with the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation rate from the previous September.”

    It explains the mechanism behind the rise, so a reader sees the higher bill comes from inflation uprating rather than new handouts.

  • “based on Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecasts”

    It gives the base for the £2.2billion comparison instead of leaving the figure unexplained.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 24 OctCouncil containing Britain's biggest asylum camp only spent £40,000 on extra police, despite £2.7m unspent grants: Local women say they are 'terrified'8.2
  2. 23 Oct'It's going to be another disaster': TV's Hotel Inspector star issues stark warning over Labour's plans to raise minimum wage for young workers3.0
  3. 23 OctPolice forced to apologise after officers captured on body-worn camera joking about death of Paul Hardcastle's son0.0
  4. 23 OctEarl wins court fight with traveller site owner who 'threatened to invade aristocrat's woods with army of men and dogs saying it was his'3.0
  5. 23 OctBudget energy bailout just for poorest benefits claimants could be a disaster like winter fuel allowance, warns Labour ex-Cabinet minister3.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail