Ynet News (English), on Gaza, 2 November 2026

8.7out of 10Severe

Trump's Gaza plan stalls as Israel's political deadlock deepens

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

Negotiations over the future of the Gaza Strip have reached a standstill, even as Washington continues pressing for implementation of U.S. President Donald Trump's plan to end the war. Sources familiar with the talks describe a significant diplomatic impasse, with no meaningful progress toward the next phase of the American framework. Meanwhile, , while the IDF continues targeting the terrorist organization's operatives.

The situation has been further complicated by the political deadlock following Israel's October 27 election. With no clear parliamentary majority and no certainty over the formation of a stable government, Israel's political leadership faces significant obstacles to establishing a long-term policy for Gaza.

That uncertainty directly affects decisions about advancing the American plan. While Washington wants to see progress, Israeli officials still do not know what the country's governing policy toward Gaza will look like in the coming months.

Israeli security officials also believe Hamas is preparing . According to sources familiar with the assessments, the terrorist organization is expected to highlight weather-related damage, inadequate infrastructure and shortages of warm clothing and .

Israeli officials assess that , hoping that criticism will lead to a suspension of targeted strikes or at least a reduction in their frequency.

The sensitivity surrounding Israeli military operations has already affected the pace of strikes in Gaza. In August, amid diplomatic tensions with Washington and statements by the Gaza Board of Peace concerning targeted strikes in central Gaza, the IDF's Southern Command was required to obtain approval from the highest military and political levels before carrying out certain targeted killings.

That policy remained in effect for several weeks and led to a reduction in the pace of .

Major change planned in management of Rafah pilot

Despite the diplomatic stalemate, preparations are advancing for one of the central components of the American plan: the "Green Rafah" pilot project.

Over the past month, the IDF has concentrated efforts in the Tel al-Sultan neighborhood of Rafah, sealing underground tunnels in the area. The objective is to neutralize the underground infrastructure ahead of the pilot's expected launch in the near future.

However, a significant change is approaching in the project's management. In recent months, an Israeli project management company signed an agreement with the Gaza Board of Peace, the international body responsible for overseeing parts of the Strip's reconstruction. Under the agreement, the company will assume responsibility for managing the tunnel-sealing project on the board's behalf.

The IDF is expected to withdraw from the civilian management and execution of the project, transferring responsibility to a dedicated administration operating under the Board of Peace and American management.

The company has already completed its logistical preparations at Kerem Shalom, including arrangements at a concrete plant that will support the work. Within the next two weeks, it is expected to formally take over management of the project from the IDF.

As part of the transition, contracts with construction companies and concrete suppliers will be transferred to the new administration. Responsibility for delivering materials, locating underground tunnels and conducting drilling operations is also expected to shift to the civilian management team.

The arrangement is intended to move a central element of the reconstruction preparations out of the IDF's direct civilian management structure, even as the military continues its security operations in the area.

While preparations for the civilian pilot proceed, IDF military operations in Gaza have not stopped.

Southern Command forces continue operating against Hamas terrorists who, according to the military, are attempting to restore the organization's capabilities and advance plans for attacks.

Several members of Hamas' military wing were killed in Israeli strikes over the past week, including .

The IDF maintains that the Hamas terrorists targeted throughout the war, particularly in recent weeks, were involved in rebuilding the organization's military capabilities and planning attacks against Israeli troops and civilians, in what the military describes as systematic violations of the ceasefire.

The military also emphasizes that Southern Command forces remain deployed in accordance with the agreement and that operations to eliminate threats will continue.

The developments highlight the growing gap between Washington's diplomatic objectives and the situation on the ground. The United States is pressing to advance the next stage of Trump's plan, transfer responsibility for civilian projects and launch the pilot program in Rafah.

Yet , the IDF continues carrying out targeted strikes and the central question of disarming the terrorist organization remains unresolved.

Above these obstacles hangs Israel's political uncertainty, which complicates decisions about the Strip's future and the extent to which Jerusalem can commit to the American framework.

For now, despite sustained US pressure and preparations on the ground, there is no indication of a significant breakthrough that would allow the diplomatic process to move forward.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Ynet News calls the people Israeli strikes killed 'terrorists' and 'Nukhba operatives' in its own voice, when its only source for who they were is the Israeli military. It states the army's claim that Hamas is rebuilding as plain fact. It lets Israeli officials recast winter hardship in Gaza as a Hamas public relations ploy, with nothing set against it. Palestinians never appear as Palestinians at all.

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “Nukhba operatives and terrorists who participated in the October 7, 2023, invasion of Israel”

    Why this matters
    Ynet says in its own voice that the people killed in Israeli strikes last week were 'Nukhba operatives' and 'terrorists' who took part in 7 October.
    The impression it gives
    That it is established fact who these dead men were and what they had done.
    The context
    The article's only source for who the dead were is the Israeli military. The next sentence shows it: the IOF 'maintains' this. No independent identification is given.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The IDF maintains that the Hamas terrorists targeted”
    • Elsewhere in the article“according to the military”

    Show it in the article

    “aerial operations against Hamas terrorists”

    Why this matters
    Ynet calls everyone targeted in the air strikes 'Hamas terrorists' in its own voice, while describing a period when strikes were scaled back.
    The impression it gives
    That every target of these air strikes was a confirmed Hamas fighter.
    The context
    The article gives no source for who was hit other than the military's own account, which it attributes elsewhere.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“according to the military”

    Show it in the article

    “IDF continues targeting Hamas terrorists”

    Why this matters
    Ynet's section heading adopts the army's label for its targets with no attribution at all.
    The impression it gives
    That the IOF's targets are terrorists as a matter of fact, before the reader reaches any sourcing.
    The context
    The body of this same section rests the description on what the IOF 'maintains'.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The IDF maintains that the Hamas terrorists targeted”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli strikes killed several people in Gaza over the past week. The Israeli military says they were members of Hamas' military wing, some of whom took part in the 7 October attack. The article does not give any independent confirmation.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “Hamas remains armed and is attempting to rebuild its ranks”

    Why this matters
    Ynet states as plain fact, in its own voice, that Hamas is rebuilding its ranks.
    The impression it gives
    That Hamas rebuilding is an established fact that justifies continued strikes.
    The context
    Later the article attributes the same claim to the Israeli military: fighters are 'attempting to restore' capabilities 'according to the military'.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“according to the military, are attempting to restore the organization's capabilities”

    Show it in the article

    “Hamas continues to retain its military capabilities”

    Why this matters
    Ynet repeats the army's assessment in its closing analysis as settled fact.
    The impression it gives
    That Hamas' military strength is independently established.
    The context
    The article's only source for Hamas' capabilities is what the IOF 'maintains'.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The IDF maintains that the Hamas terrorists targeted”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The Israeli military says Hamas remains armed and is trying to rebuild its ranks.

  3. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Minor

    “an international public relations campaign focused on the humanitarian consequences of the approaching winter”

    Why this matters
    Ynet opens the passage on Gaza's winter hardship by presenting it as a Hamas public relations campaign, in Israeli officials' words.
    The impression it gives
    That reports of winter suffering in Gaza are mainly propaganda to be discounted.
    The context
    The article never says whether the shortages are real or why they exist. It says nothing of Israel's genocide in Gaza, which the UN Commission of Inquiry has found, nor of what Israel lets into the strip.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “genocide”.
    • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “Hamas intends to use the humanitarian situation to increase international pressure on Israel”

    Why this matters
    Israeli officials' assessment closes the passage with no other voice and no fact set against it.
    The impression it gives
    That criticism of Israeli strikes over winter conditions would be manufactured by Hamas rather than prompted by real suffering.
    The context
    The article itself lists the hardship: weather damage, broken infrastructure, shortages of warm clothing. It never asks a Palestinian, an aid agency or anyone else whether these are real, or who caused them.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“shortages of warm clothing and essential supplies for Gaza residents”
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

  4. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “essential supplies for Gaza residents”

    Why this matters
    This is the only place the people of Gaza appear, and only as the subject of a predicted Hamas campaign.
    The impression it gives
    That the story of Gaza's future concerns Israeli officials, Washington and Hamas, not the people who live there.
    The context
    Every voice in the article is Israeli officials, the IOF or unnamed sources. The word Palestinian never appears.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 2 Nov'Inside, I was still at war': Nova survivor's descent into addiction and road to recovery0.0
  2. 1 NovFormer IDF chief: Israel misread Hamas, prioritized Iran before Oct. 7 attack3.0
  3. 30 OctReport: Israel gives Gaza terrorists choice between dying alone or with family8.0
  4. 30 OctReport: Israel gives Gaza terrorists choice between dying alone or with family8.7
  5. 29 Oct‘Genocide’ and ‘apartheid’: Harvard's hometown backs divestment from IDF suppliers3.0

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)