Daily Mail, on UK Politics, 27 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Two men are charged with National Security Act offences following RAF Fairford - as suspect believed to be assisting Iran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Two men have been and are set to appear in court, with one suspected of assisting Iran's foreign intelligence service. Mohmed Ahmad Abdulkarim, 24, and Nouman Essghir, 24, both of Westminster, London , have been charged with offences under the National Security Act 2023. Police descended on the Gloucestershire airbase in the early hours of September 27 after being alerted to the presence of three suspicious vehicles in the area.

Dozens of residents were evacuated from their homes and a major counterterrorism probe was launched. Officers arrested seven people but only Abdulkarim and Essghir have been charged with any offences. The other five remain on police bail. Abdulkarim is charged with assisting a foreign intelligence service, understood to be Iran , 'in carrying out UK-related activities' between August 31 and September 28. Essghir, who was arrested by officers at the scene, has been charged with entering a prohibited place for a purpose prejudicial to the UK.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that no explosive devices were found in the vans seized outside RAF Fairford. It describes evacuations and a major counterterrorism probe under a 'terror plot' headline, so a reader is left to assume explosives or an attack device were involved.

Both men are British nationals and will appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court later today. Police descended on the Gloucestershire airbase in the early hours of September 27 after being alerted to the presence of three suspicious vehicles in the area Dozens of residents were evacuated from their homes and a major counterterrorism probe was launched Five men were later arrested near the base early on September 27, while two others were also later detained The foreign intelligence service Abdulkarim is suspected of assisting is Iran, counterterror police said.

A 25-year-old dual UK-Iranian national who was re-arrested last week has been released without charge and remains on police bail, after first being detained on October 1. Police have also since interviewed another man under caution. RAF Fairford has been used as a base for US bomber jets involved in strikes on Iran since the outbreak of conflict in the Middle East at the start of this year. America's military has since removed all of its B-1 bombers from the site.

Assistant Commissioner Laurence Taylor, the head of National Counter Terrorism Policing in the UK, said: 'Earlier this morning, Nouman Essghir, 24, a British national from the borough of Westminster, London, was charged under Section 4 of the National Security Act 2023, for suspected activity on Saturday 22 August. 'He was first arrested at the scene in Gloucestershire on Sunday 27 September, and re-arrested on 20 October. 'Essghir will appear at Westminster Magistrates Court this morning. 'A second man, a 25-year-old dual UK/Iranian national, re-arrested on the same date, has been released without charge.

However, he remains on police bail following his first arrest on Thursday 1 October. 'Following the re-arrest of these individuals, detectives also interviewed a further man under caution. 'As a result, Mohammed Abdulkarim, a 24-year-old British national, from the borough of Westminster, London, has been charged under Section 3 of the National Security Act 2023, which makes it an offence to assist a foreign intelligence service. 'In this case, we believe that country to be Iran.

Abdulkarim will appear at Westminster Magistrates today. 'The five other men arrested in connection with this investigation, remain on police bail.' He added: 'We have seen a range of incidents in recent months that we believe have been directed by the Iranian state, and as the Director General of Mi5 said just the other week, we are working together to intervene, identify and respond to that threat. 'The public can help us with this, and as always, I would urge them to report anything that they're worried about – those reports can and do make a difference.'

Frank Ferguson, Chief Crown Prosecutor for the CPS Special Crime and Counter Terrorism Division, said: 'The Crown Prosecution Service has decided to prosecute two individuals with National Security Act offences following a Counter Terrorism Policing investigation into a high-profile incident involving RAF Fairford. 'We will continue to work closely with our partners as this complex investigation continues.'

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Daily Mail reports that two men have been charged under the National Security Act after the RAF Fairford incident. Its headline puts 'terror plot' in quotation marks, though no one quoted in the article uses those words and the charges are not terrorism offences. It also leaves out other outlets' reporting that no explosive devices were found in the seized vans.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “'terror plot'”

    Why this matters
    The headline puts 'terror plot' in quotation marks and hangs the charges on it, as if a named source had called the case a terror plot.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the two men have been charged over a terror plot that the police or prosecutors have described as such.
    The context
    No one quoted in the article uses the words 'terror plot'. The prosecutor speaks only of a high-profile incident, and the charges are National Security Act offences: entering a prohibited place and assisting a foreign intelligence service. Neither is a terrorism charge.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a high-profile incident involving RAF Fairford”
    • Elsewhere in the article“which makes it an offence to assist a foreign intelligence service”

    Show it in the article

    “charged over an alleged 'terror plot' at RAF Fairford”

    Why this matters
    The opening line says the men were charged 'over' the alleged plot at the base. It ties both charges to the incident of 27 September.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes both charges relate to the night police descended on the base and residents were evacuated.
    The context
    The police statement the Mail prints says Essghir was charged for suspected activity on 22 August, weeks before the incident. Abdulkarim's charge covers assisting a foreign intelligence service over a month-long period. The article's own quotes do not support the link to a terror plot on that night.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“for suspected activity on Saturday 22 August”
    • Elsewhere in the article“between August 31 and September 28”

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that no explosive devices were found in the vans seized outside RAF Fairford. It describes evacuations and a major counterterrorism probe under a 'terror plot' headline, so a reader is left to assume explosives or an attack device were involved.

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 27 OctBosses should be banned from asking job applicants about their salary history and be forced to reveal current wages, equality watchdog says3.0
  2. 27 OctBungling Labour backtracks on manifesto vow to equalise minimum wage for under-21s after youth jobs crunch6.0
  3. 27 OctQUENTIN LETTS: His policies are as skimpy as his shorts, but after 100 days of watching Andy Burnham up close, this is what I've learned about our Daytime TV Prime Minister6.0
  4. 27 OctDAILY MAIL COMMENT: After 100 days in Downing Street, what exactly has the PM achieved?0.0
  5. 27 OctPM's new foot in mouth Brexit blunder: Two weeks after climbdown over Russia and referendum, No10 spokesman has to row back on Burnham's freedom of movement comments6.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail