The Independent, on Climate, 11 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found
About this analysis

The Independent reports that the Advertising Standards Authority banned ads from four brands for carbon neutral or carbon positive delivery claims that did not make clear they relied on offsetting credits. It names the brands, quotes the ads, sets out the regulator's reasoning and gives Grind Coffee's response. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “Ads for Grind Coffee, SportShoes.com, ProCook and toilet paper brand Who Gives a Crap have been banned”

    The article names every company whose ad was banned in its opening line, so no responsible party is hidden.

  • “Where these claims rely on carbon offsetting, this must be made clear so that people don’t think what’s being advertised produces no or few emissions.”

    The article quotes the ASA's investigations manager explaining what readers would wrongly believe from such claims. This gives the climate stakes of the ruling in the regulator's own words.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Independent

  1. 11 NovWorld leaders begin talks at UN climate conference amid concerns that actions are inadequate, slow0.0
  2. 10 NovGreta Thunberg issues urgent warning at UN climate talks: 'Everything we love is at stake'0.0
  3. 10 NovNapa Valley winery sued after worker allegedly started wildfire that destroyed harvests 0.0
  4. 10 NovGreta Thunberg arrives at UN climate talks saying ‘everything we love is at stake’0.0
  5. 10 NovNations promise to install more rooftop solar at UN climate talks0.0

Everything we scored from The Independent