Ynet News (English), on Iran, 2 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Iran-US talks stall as

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Iran's supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, has granted his government "certain powers" regarding peace talks with the United States, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Monday. He added that Tehran would "try to resolve the issue through dialogue."

The Wall Street Journal reported that talks between the U.S. and Iran through their main diplomatic channel, mediated by Qatar, have stalled. According to the mediators, the discussions are focused on which country should be the first to make concessions to move negotiations forward. Meanwhile, several Arab countries have warned Iran that they may retaliate, either jointly or individually, if it targets their infrastructure, the mediators said.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the Islamic Republic was engaged in intensive consultations through mediators, including Qatar and Pakistan, in an effort to reach a possible agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and resume negotiations with Washington.

"If the U.S. accepts our conditions, the Strait of Hormuz will reopen and negotiations will resume," Araghchi said.

Tehran said talks with Washington were continuing, even though days of discussions with Qatar ended without a breakthrough, but with revised proposals on the table.

"We are doing our best in this process, and we hope that there is rationality on the other side so that they prioritize diplomacy over other paths," Araghchi said.

Several Iranian sources said they believed U.S. military action was now a more likely scenario than reaching an agreement.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said the talks were centered on Tehran's seven-point plan to end the war, which it submitted in September. He added that the plan had since been scaled back after U.S. President Donald Trump rejected it that same month.

However, Baghaei stressed that narrowing the proposal would not change Iran's fundamental position: Talks on its nuclear program could resume only after Tehran had confirmed that all its conditions had been met.

Asked whether the possibility of transferring the Islamic Republic's stockpile of enriched uranium to another country had been raised during negotiations, and whether Iran would agree to such a move, Baghaei said no.

Under the plan, the U.S. would end its naval blockade of Iranian ports, the Islamic Republic would reopen the shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz, Washington would permit Iranian oil sales and newly imposed sanctions on Iran would be lifted. The sides would then discuss additional issues.

An official briefed on the talks said Iranian negotiators left on Sunday, but not because of difficulties in the negotiations. The official added that a draft proposal was being circulated, without providing further details.

Concerns in China, Russia and Iran

Amid concerns that fighting between the U.S. and Iran could resume after the U.S. midterm elections, which begin Tuesday, China and Russia voiced opposition to renewed military strikes in the Middle East.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article describes the threat of renewed fighting only as fighting 'between the U.S. and Iran' and 'military activity against Iran', with no actor named. It never says that Israel launched the war together with the US, or that Israel is preparing new strikes. Other outlets reported the same weekend that the US and Israel are planning strikes after the midterms, and that Israel has completed its preparations. Yedioth Ahronoth, Ynet's own sister paper, carried the second report. Without this, a reader believes Israel is not a party to the possible new attack on Iran.

How we know

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said all parties involved in the war should focus on political solutions rather than returning to hostilities. He made the remarks after meeting senior Iranian official Ali Bagheri Kani in Beijing.

Russia's Foreign Ministry also addressed developments in the Middle East, saying reports of renewed military activity against Iran were "a cause for great concern" and calling for intensified diplomatic contacts between the sides.

According to Iranian reports, Mohsen Rezaei, secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, held a telephone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin as part of ongoing consultations between Tehran and Moscow, following recent meetings between senior officials from the two countries.

The two discussed the current regional and global situation, "with particular emphasis on the West Asia region," according to the reports.

In Tehran, residents expressed concern about the possibility of renewed fighting, with some describing a sense of helplessness.

Mohadese, a 27-year-old health inspector who lives in the Iranian capital, told AFP: "The news coming in is truly worrying. However… there is nothing I can actually do about it."

Other Tehran residents, including Ebrahim, a 48-year-old merchant from the city center, saw little reason for concern.

"We do not fear another war; we have been at war for 48 years now — we are always at war," he said.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Ynet gives a mostly attributed account of stalled Iran-US talks, with Iranian, Chinese and Russian officials quoted at length. The headline drops the attribution the body gives to the Arab states' warning. The article presents renewed strikes as a US-Iran matter only and never says that Israel launched the war with the US and has completed its own preparations to strike Iran again.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article describes the threat of renewed fighting only as fighting 'between the U.S. and Iran' and 'military activity against Iran', with no actor named. It never says that Israel launched the war together with the US, or that Israel is preparing new strikes. Other outlets reported the same weekend that the US and Israel are planning strikes after the midterms, and that Israel has completed its preparations. Yedioth Ahronoth, Ynet's own sister paper, carried the second report. Without this, a reader believes Israel is not a party to the possible new attack on Iran.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  2. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Arab states warn Tehran against infrastructure attacks”

    Why this matters
    The headline states as plain fact that Arab states warned Tehran against attacking their infrastructure.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the warning as a confirmed, public statement by Arab governments.
    The context
    The body gives the warning only second hand, through the Qatari-led mediators. It names no Arab government and quotes no Arab official.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“if it targets their infrastructure, the mediators said”

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 2 NovTrump looks for a scapegoat as Iran war drags on, questions Hegseth and Caine3.0
  2. 2 NovTrump looks for a scapegoat as Iran war drags on, questions ...3.0
  3. 1 NovTrump, Netanyahu discuss Iran as Tehran reports tanker explosions in Strait of Hormuz6.0
  4. 1 NovTrump, Netanyahu discuss Iran as Tehran reports tanker explosions in Strait of Hormuz6.0
  5. 31 OctFirst the radars, then the rest: Iran's methodical assault on US bases0.0

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)