Metro, on UK Politics, 27 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

More than £22,000,000 in donations to Reform came from abroad (Picture: Getty) from the Electoral Commission revealed that Reform UK’s donations have been . 80% of donations to Nigel Farage’s political party were made by donors or companies based overseas. It’s a stark comparison to Labour, which received just 0.15% of its funding from overseas and the Tories, which received 3.57% of their donations from overseas since July 2025. £22,440,000 was donated to Reform by those outside of the UK, with just £7,220,000 being contributed from people based in the country.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

Metro never says who the overseas donors were. The Independent reported that most of the money came from Ben Delo, who has since moved back to the UK, and Christopher Harborne, and that other donors included a British entrepreneur living in Portugal and a UK-registered company with a British director in Italy. Without this, and alongside Phillipson's words about 'foreign influence', a reader is likely to believe foreign nationals are bankrolling Reform.

How we know

There is no indication of wrongdoing, but . : ‘The scale of Reform’s reliance on donations from wealthy overseas backers raises further questions about the party’s financial affairs. Farage and Jenrick gave a speech yesterday about how Britain is Broke (Picture: Getty) ‘The public deserves to know exactly who is bankrolling Nigel Farage’s party, what interests these donors are seeking to advance, and whether those interests align with the priorities of the British people.’

She added: ‘While Farage pushes ever more extreme policies to try and distract from the sleaze and scandal engulfing Reform, this Labour government is working to strengthen our political finance laws and better protect our democracy from foreign influence.’ Earlier this month, Reform UK concluded that it did not break electoral law after senior figures were secretly filmed discussing how foreign donations could be handled. The party launched its own investigation following a Channel 4 News report which showed senior figures discussing a potential £500,000 donation from an alleged foreign donor.

Its 27-page report found no evidence that laws had been broken, but admitted that two senior figures had said things that were ‘wrong, careless and in one instance untrue’. The investigation also concluded that the £500,000 donation discussed in the footage never took place. It found that Dan Jukes, a consultant working with several clients, commissioned the polling discussed by undercover reporters, rather than Reform. Orr was criticised for suggesting nobody would discover impermissible donations and for making ‘extremely condescending’ comments about the Electoral Commission.

Jukes similarly faced criticism for describing polling arrangements as ‘clandestine’ and ‘off the books’, which the investigation said made a lawful arrangement appear suspicious. Both men were suspended after the Channel 4 report, while the Metropolitan Police is separately investigating the allegations. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk. For more stories like this, check our news page.

Read the original article on metro.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Metro says Reform UK's donations were 'almost entirely funded from abroad', but its own sums give about 76% from overseas and more than £7 million from the UK. It calls the data 'shocking' in its own voice, claims 'many in Westminster' were shocked on the word of Labour's chair alone, and gives Reform no reply on the figures. It also never says who the overseas donors were, though The Independent reported some were British citizens living abroad.

  1. Uses figures that mislead

    Minor

    “almost entirely funded from abroad”

    Why this matters
    Metro states in its own voice that Reform UK's donations were 'almost entirely funded from abroad'.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes almost none of Reform's money came from people in the UK.
    The context
    The article's own figures put the overseas share at 80% at most, and they show more than £7 million given from inside the UK. A fifth or more of the total is not a sliver.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“with just £7,220,000 being contributed from people based in the country”
    • Elsewhere in the article“80% of donations to Nigel Farage’s political party were made by donors or companies based overseas”

    Show it in the article

    “80% of Reform donations this year came from overseas”

    Why this matters
    The headline gives a flat 80% for 'this year' with no source and no qualification.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes 80% is a firm figure for the calendar year, backed by the numbers in the piece.
    The context
    Metro's own totals of £22,440,000 from abroad and £7,220,000 from the UK come to about 76%, not 80%. The Independent, whose analysis this is, gives 79.41% for the year 2025 to 2026 and says the donors were 'recently' based overseas, a word Metro drops.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Shocking new data”

    Why this matters
    Metro labels the Electoral Commission data 'shocking' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is told how to feel before being given the figures, and takes the donations as a scandal.
    The context
    The article itself says there is no indication of wrongdoing. The verdict comes from the outlet, not from the facts it reports.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“There is no indication of wrongdoing”

    Show it in the article

    “the numbers have shocked many in Westminster”

    Why this matters
    Metro claims 'many in Westminster' were shocked but names nobody except the Labour chair.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes there is broad shock across Westminster.
    The context
    The only reaction the article reports is from Labour's party chair, a political opponent of Reform.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Labour Party chair Bridget Phillipson told the Independent”

    Show it in the article

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Labour Party chair Bridget Phillipson told the Independent”

    Why this matters
    Metro gives Labour's party chair three sentences, including a charge of 'sleaze and scandal', and offers no response from Reform on the donation figures.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears only Labour's reading of the figures and its questions about donors' interests.
    The context
    Reform's side appears only in the section on its internal investigation, not on the overseas donations the story is about.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“distract from the sleaze and scandal engulfing Reform”

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    Metro never says who the overseas donors were. The Independent reported that most of the money came from Ben Delo, who has since moved back to the UK, and Christopher Harborne, and that other donors included a British entrepreneur living in Portugal and a UK-registered company with a British director in Italy. Without this, and alongside Phillipson's words about 'foreign influence', a reader is likely to believe foreign nationals are bankrolling Reform.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Metro

  1. 27 OctNigel Farage lashes out at Reform 'incompetence' after speech in half-empty hall3.0
  2. 26 OctRejoining EU is 'inevitable' says Sadiq Khan after Burnham opens door3.0
  3. 25 OctWind-up radios sell out as shoppers panic at government's Be Ready campaign3.0
  4. 25 OctUK must be ready for war in 1000 days says Streeting0.0
  5. 25 Oct'PM's aim to end rough sleeping by Christmas is great - but what comes after?'6.0

Everything we scored from Metro