City AM, by Maurício Alencar, on UK Politics, 5 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

New Mandelson files to be released

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

New files relating to Lord Peter Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador are expected to be published by Christmas, City AM can reveal. The senior civil servant Cat Little has written to MPs, saying the Metropolitan Police has allowed the government to publish new files which were previously held back by the Metropolitan Police pending an ongoing investigation into Mandelson. Little said the Met had previously asked the government not to publish a series of documents so that a criminal investigation on the former Labour grandee’s alleged leaks of sensitive information to the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who died in prison in 2019.

It is unclear what the new files will show or which part of his appointment they will relate to. MPs on a security committee will now redact any information which may prejudice national security or international relations. Documents in Epstein files at the beginning of the year appeared to show that Mandelson passed on confidential information about bailouts and Treasury assets to Epstein at around the time of the 2008 financial crisis.

Mandelson was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office and released on bail. It was reported in the summer that an investigation was at risk of collapsing. Mandelson files to return to Westminster Sir Keir Starmer, who resigned as Prime Minister in the summer, came under considerable pressure over his handling of Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador in 2024 and what security concerns were raised during a vetting process.

Starmer’s former chief of staff Morgan McSweeney resigned over his involvement in Mandelson’s appointment. Kemi Badenoch introduced a ‘humble address motion’, a mechanism which compels the government to release internal documents. In the first batch of files released in March, exchanges showed security concerns over vetting were highlighted by Whitehall officials and national security adviser Jonathan Powell. The saga over vetting concerns led to the sacking of Sir Olly Robbins, who was then the Foreign Office’s top civil servant.

A second release in June revealed discussions held between ministers and Mandelson at the time he was serving in Washington DC. Documents featured some embarrassing remarks made by ministers, including the work and pensions secretary Pat McFadden . In one message, McFadden wrote about meetings with Labour MPs: “Every meeting I have is ‘who can we tax in order to pay benefits to others’. They’re asking the wrong questions.” The Metropolitan Police and Cabinet Office have been approached for comment.

Read the original article on cityam.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

City AM reports that further documents on Peter Mandelson's appointment as US ambassador are expected by Christmas, after the Met lifted its request to hold them back. It keeps the allegations against Mandelson attributed and hedged. The only flaw is a headline that puts 'by Christmas' in quotation marks, though no one in the body is quoted saying it.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “‘by Christmas’”

    Why this matters
    The headline puts the words 'by Christmas' in quotation marks, as if an official or a document had said them.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the Christmas timetable to be a quoted commitment from the government, the Met or Cat Little's letter.
    The context
    No one in the article is quoted saying 'by Christmas'. The body gives the timing as City AM's own reporting of an expectation, and quotes no source for those words.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“are expected to be published by Christmas, City AM can reveal”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “alleged leaks of sensitive information”

    It keeps the allegation against Mandelson attributed as alleged rather than stating it as fact while a criminal investigation is ongoing.

  • “arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office and released on bail”

    It states the legal position precisely, an arrest on suspicion with bail, without implying a charge or guilt.

  • “appeared to show”

    It hedges what the Epstein documents show instead of presenting them as proof.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from City AM

  1. 5 NovConsultancies vulnerable as government plots non-compete axe0.0
  2. 5 NovBurnham’s Ten Year Plan: a Poundland in every postcode?0.0
  3. 5 NovWill Andy Burnham’s stockpile missive start a tinned food revolution?3.0
  4. 5 NovMayors to get new powers over water companies in ‘public control’ push0.0
  5. 4 NovThe parliamentary bill that could speed up the FCA0.0

Everything we scored from City AM