Middle East Eye, on Iran, 11 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran refuses to surrender enriched uranium, threatens to strike US bases in Europe if attacked

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 findingSee it marked on middleeasteye.net

Iran has no intention of surrendering its enriched nuclear material, which it wants to use to build nuclear-powered submarines, security chief Mohsen Rezaei said on Wednesday, in an apparent rejection of US demands to give up the material for a political settlement. In an interview with Al Mayadeen TV network, Rezaei said Iran will not allow a “single speck” of enriched uranium to leave the country. "We need the enriched material to design ships and submarines that work on nuclear energy," Rezaei said, adding that Tehran has informed Moscow that its enriched nuclear material will remain in the country and "we will use it ourselves".

Rezaei’s remarks come a day after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called Iran’s terms for a political settlement “absurd” and stressed that the Trump administration believes its maritime blockade against Iran gives them the upper hand in negotiations. Rezaei, who has become more prominent in the media in recent months for explaining Iran’s terms, struck a defiant tone in his interview. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters “If American aircraft take off from an American military base, even one located in a European country or some other distant region, to bomb Iran, we will strike those bases as well," Rezaei said.

He also said that Iran's response to renewed US attacks would "target America's more distant military installations - including the ones we have not yet attacked", without specifying details. "We may even strike certain islands that they assume are beyond the reach of our missiles," he added. Rezaei may be referring to Diego Garcia , the Indian Ocean island where the US has access to a military base. The US is widely believed to have used the base in its February 2026 attack and in the following months.

The Trump administration has used deescalatory language since the Republican Party was badly defeated in US midterm elections on 3 November by the Democrats, who campaigned against the war and rising energy prices. While US President Donald Trump has said that the war was “effectively over” and that there was “momentum” to end the conflict, the two sides seem far apart on files including nuclear enrichment, sanctions relief and control over the Strait of Hormuz.

Iranian missile capabilities While the Trump administration has characterised Iran as a defeated foe, Tehran appears to be working to recover from the US-Israeli attacks that began in February. Bloomberg reported on Tuesday that Iran is now capable of building about 50 ballistic missiles per month, or roughly half its prewar capacity, providing a substantial arsenal should the US and Israel resume attacking. US says no need for new attacks but calls Iran's peace terms 'absurd' Read More » Meanwhile, Iran unveiled on Wednesday what it characterised as a new underground "missile city", housing ballistic and cruise missiles, according to a report by Tasnim news agency.

The US’s Gulf allies bore the brunt of Iran’s retaliation over the US-Israeli attack, with the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait facing thousands of missile and drone strikes. While direct attacks have stopped, Iran is still striking vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, as it looks to compete with the US for control over the waterway. The Houthis, who are aligned with Iran, are also bombing Saudi Arabia, .

On Wednesday, insurer Allianz Trade said Gulf countries face more than $200bn in damage and economic losses from the war, and the number could quadruple by 2030. "Physical damage across the region is assessed [at] just above $200bn, mostly concentrated in Hormuz-locked economies, especially in energy infrastructure," the insurer said in a report. Copyright © 2014 - 2026 . Middle East Eye. All rights reserved. Only England and Wales jurisdiction apply in all legal matters.

Middle East Eye ISSN 2634-2456

Read the original article on middleeasteye.net (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Middle East Eye reports Mohsen Rezaei's refusal to give up Iran's enriched uranium and his threat to strike US bases in Europe if they are used to attack Iran. It attributes his claims, Bloomberg's missile estimate and Tasnim's 'missile city' report to their sources, and it names the US-Israeli attacks as the start of the war. The one lapse is minor: in its own voice the outlet states a motive for Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia with no source.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “as they look to extend their territory in Yemen”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, MEE says the Houthis are bombing Saudi Arabia because they want to extend their territory in Yemen. It gives no source for that aim.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes it as established that territorial expansion in Yemen is the Houthis' purpose in attacking Saudi Arabia.
    The context
    The article attributes no statement, report or official to this motive. It is the outlet's own reading of a group's aims, stated as fact.

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Tehran appears to be working to recover from the US-Israeli attacks that began in February”

    It names the US and Israel as the attackers who began the war, rather than describing a war that simply broke out.

  • “Iran's retaliation over the US-Israeli attack”

    It ties Iran's strikes on Gulf states to the US-Israeli attack that came first, so the reader knows the order of events.

  • “what it characterised as a new underground "missile city", housing ballistic and cruise missiles, according to a report by Tasnim news agency”

    It reports an Iranian claim as Iran's own characterisation and names the agency that carried it, rather than stating it as fact.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Middle East Eye

  1. 10 NovUS says no need for new attacks but calls Iran's peace terms 'absurd'0.0
  2. 9 NovSenior UAE official says Gulf faces 'prolonged uncertainty' with no settlement to Iran war0.0
  3. 9 NovIran war: Will Trump's midterm defeat end or entrench the conflict with Tehran?0.0
  4. 9 NovErdogan urges Trump to avoid fresh Iran strikes as Turkey pushes for deal3.0
  5. 8 Nov'Iron Gate plan is merely wordplay': Iran mocks US military initiative to disrupt supply routes0.0

Everything we scored from Middle East Eye