Tehran Times · Iran · 5 Sept 2026

The headline editorialises, and passive voice hides who attacked.

4.2
/ 10 · article score
scored on 4 of 11 measures · thin coverage

The double standard

Iranian casualties are reported as established fact with named victims and precise figures, while the actions attributed to the United States and Israel are hedged with qualifiers only when legal accountability is invoked, creating an asymmetry between the certainty granted to Iranian suffering and the uncertainty attached to the alleged perpetrators.

How it builds, in Iran seeks international legal response

  1. Iranian deaths stated as fact, precise figure, named location

    many Iranian civilians were killed during the conflict, including 168 schoolchildren in Minab on the first day of the offensive

    Asserted as established fact with no attribution or qualification

  2. Civilian deaths reported as fact, sourced only to Iranian official

    Hospitals, educational and cultural institutions, residential areas and other civilian infrastructure were also targeted, he said, resulting in the deaths of numerous civilians, including women and children

    Single Iranian government source, no independent verification noted

  3. Responsibility hedged with 'allegedly' only for perpetrators

    universal jurisdiction to pursue individuals allegedly responsible for serious international crimes

    Qualified with 'allegedly' when naming those held responsible

  4. War crimes hedged as 'alleged' when attribution matters

    alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the two conflicts

    Qualified with 'alleged' when the claim implicates named states

  5. War crimes asserted plainly, then immediately re-hedged

    The Iranian judiciary chief described the actions of the United States and Israel as clear examples of war crimes and criticized international organizations for 'their failure to respond adequately to the alleged violations.'

    Inconsistent: 'clear examples of war crimes' then 'alleged violations' in same sentence

The same decision, both sides

Whether a death toll is presented as fact or as a claim

Iranian civilian deaths, including a precise figure of 168 schoolchildren, are stated as fact with no qualifying language.

many Iranian civilians were killed during the conflict, including 168 schoolchildren in Minab on the first day of the offensive

The responsibility of the United States and Israel for those same deaths is consistently hedged with 'allegedly' or 'alleged'.

universal jurisdiction to pursue individuals allegedly responsible for serious international crimes

Consistency of hedging language within the same passage

The article calls the actions of the United States and Israel 'clear examples of war crimes' without qualification.

The Iranian judiciary chief described the actions of the United States and Israel as clear examples of war crimes

The very next clause retreats to 'alleged violations', applying the hedge only when it concerns accountability for those same states.

criticized international organizations for 'their failure to respond adequately to the alleged violations.'

What a reader is left with. A reader is left accepting Iranian casualty figures and the targeting of civilian sites as established facts while simultaneously being reminded, through selective hedging, that the legal responsibility of the United States and Israel remains unproven, making the suffering vivid and certain but the perpetration uncertain and contested.

File a complaint

This article can be challenged with Tehran Times's editorial-standards team.

  • Amend the headline to name the belligerent alleged to have committed the acts under discussion, for example: "Iran urges BRICS to pursue accountability for alleged war crimes by [belligerent name]."
  • Add a verification caveat to the sentence containing the figure of "168 schoolchildren in Minab on the first day of the offensive," or confirm in an editor's note that the figure has been independently verified by the Tehran Times.
Be the first to complain

Every highlight is a quote the model flagged. Tap one — or a metric below — to see what it measures and why it scored the way it did.

Aggressor framingHeadline analysisLegal framing

Iran urges BRICS to pursue war crimes accountability

TEHRAN- Iran has called on BRICS judicial authorities to take concrete legal steps against those responsible for 'war crimes and crimes against humanity' committed during two wars of aggression against the Islamic Republic, arguing that international justice must not be subordinated to political power. Addressing the BRICS Chief Justices’ Forum in New Delhi, Iran’s Judiciary Chief Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei urged member states to condemn violations of Iran’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and to make use of the principle of universal jurisdiction to pursue individuals allegedly responsible for serious international crimes. The BRICS Chief Justices’ Forum, hosted by India’s Supreme Court from Sept. 4 to 6, is bringing together chief justices, presidents of supreme courts and senior judicial officials from BRICS members and partner countries. Its agenda includes international commercial disputes, cross-border enforcement of arbitration awards, artificial intelligence in judicial administration and sustainable development. Mohseni-Ejei said the international community needs justice “more than ever,” but warned that justice loses its meaning when it is applied selectively or shaped by political considerations. He argued that the rule of law should not be sacrificed to geopolitical interests and that the rights of nations should not be determined by their relative power. The Iranian judiciary chief pointed to BRICS’ growing international significance, describing the grouping as one of the world’s major economic and political formations and saying it has an increasingly important role in the emergence of a new international order. He noted that BRICS declarations and other documents have repeatedly stressed mutual respect, respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of states, the peaceful settlement of disputes and adherence to the principles of the United Nations Charter. Against that backdrop, Mohseni-Ejei said the gap between international legal principles and their implementation had become increasingly evident. Despite major advances in science and technology, he said, the world is witnessing 'growing violations of national sovereignty, widespread breaches of human rights and international humanitarian law, unlawful unilateral sanctions and increasing pressure on independent states by hegemonic powers.' Iran seeks international legal response Mohseni-Ejei said Iran had paid a heavy price for maintaining its independence and accused the United States and Israel of launching “brutal aggression” against Iran during the current and previous Iranian years. He argued that the attacks should not be viewed merely as a conventional military confrontation, but as an unlawful act with wider implications under international law. According to Mohseni-Ejei, many Iranian civilians were killed during the conflict, including 168 schoolchildren in Minab on the first day of the offensive. He said the incident represented only part of the casualties and destruction sustained during a 40-day war. Hospitals, educational and cultural institutions, residential areas and other civilian infrastructure were also targeted, he said, resulting in the deaths of numerous civilians, including women and children. The Iranian judiciary chief described the actions of the United States and Israel as clear examples of war crimes and criticized international organizations for 'their failure to respond adequately to the alleged violations.' He said judicial systems and legal institutions had a responsibility to respond when fundamental human rights were violated, civilians were killed or forcibly displaced, civilian infrastructure was destroyed and perpetrators of international crimes escaped accountability. Mohseni-Ejei called on BRICS judicial authorities to begin by formally condemning 'violations of Iran’s sovereignty and territorial integrity,' particularly in light of the principles enshrined in the UN Charter. He also urged BRICS members to take practical measures to prevent further violations and invoke universal jurisdiction to pursue those responsible for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the two conflicts.

Read the original article ↗