Ynet News (English), on UK Politics, 26 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

UK Jewish leaders declare Green Party ‘racist’ over anti-Zionist policy

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

The Board of Deputies of British Jews, the country's largest representative Jewish organization, has formally declared the Green Party of England and Wales a racist party following its decision to adopt a policy defining Zionism as racism. The resolution, approved Sunday by an overwhelming majority of 118 votes to one, states that the Greens have adopted an antisemitic platform and that the Board will now treat the party as it does other parties it considers racist.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

Ynet says only that the Board will treat the Greens as it treats other parties it considers racist. It does not say what that means in practice. The Board's motion urged other parties not to make deals with the Greens unless they rejected the policy.

How we know

The decision was taken at the Board's October plenary meeting in response to a controversial motion passed earlier this month at the Green Party's annual conference in Brighton. The Greens approved the motion on October 4, with approximately 56% of delegates supporting a policy declaring Zionism a form of racism and calling for the establishment of "a single democratic Palestinian state in all of historic Palestine," a territory that includes present-day Israel.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

Ynet never quotes how the Green motion defines Zionism. The motion calls it an ideology advocating 'an ethnonationalist Jewish state in historic Palestine to the exclusion and/ or domination of the non-Jewish population', one that 'privileges one ethnic group on the basis of the subjugation of others'. The only definition of Zionism in the article is the Board's: national self-determination and a connection to Zion. A reader comes away believing the Greens declared Jewish identity or connection to Israel racist, when the motion's text defines the target as exclusion and domination of non-Jews.

How we know

The vote has intensified controversy surrounding the left-wing party, which has grown from a relatively marginal political force into a significant player in British politics. Its position on Zionism has drawn criticism from Jewish organizations and political figures, including members of the Green Party itself. A decision reflecting deep concerns among British Jews The Board's resolution reflects what it describes as profound concern within Britain's Jewish community over a policy that labels a central element of Jewish identity as racist.

For many British Jews, the connection to Israel is expressed through religious observance, family relationships, language, culture and the belief that the Jewish people have the same right to national self-determination as any other people. The Board argues that defining this connection as racist carries consequences extending beyond political debate about Israel. It says such language can affect Jewish participation in public life and the way Jewish communal institutions are treated.

The organization's formal declaration is particularly significant because of its representative structure. The Board encompasses 201 constituencies drawn from synagogues and Jewish communal organizations across Britain. Its membership includes 309 deputies and 32 observers under the age of 35, with 91 deputies representing regional Jewish communities. The resolution was debated and approved through this structure, bringing together representatives from across the country. ‘The Green Party has become a racist party’ Board of Deputies President Phil Rosenberg said the vote represented an unmistakable decision by Jewish community representatives.

"Today, representatives of Jewish communities across Britain have delivered a clear verdict," Rosenberg said. "By adopting an antisemitic platform, the Green Party of England and Wales has become a racist party. We will treat it accordingly." Rosenberg argued that no political party had the right to characterize a central part of Jewish identity, rooted in thousands of years of history, religion and peoplehood, as racist. He said the Greens' policy applied that label to substantial sections of British Jewry, including synagogues and communal organizations, effectively giving political legitimacy to anti-Jewish prejudice.

The Board president called on the Green Party's leadership to take responsibility for the decision, reverse the policy and confront what he described as the antisemitism it had legitimized. He also expressed support for Green Party members who opposed the motion, particularly Jewish members whose objections and warnings, he said, had gone unheeded. Rosenberg argued that those members deserved to have their concerns heard and receive support, rather than being marginalized within the party.

Green Party rejects accusations The Green Party has rejected the Board's characterization of the party and its policy. A spokesperson said the Greens do not discriminate against people who identify as Zionists and maintained that the party would continue campaigning for Palestinian rights and . Green Party leader Zack Polanski, who is Jewish, has previously said he would not have supported the Zionism motion in its existing form and would have preferred an amended version.

He has nevertheless defended elements of the party's position concerning Palestinian rights. The controversy has exposed disagreements within the Greens over how to distinguish opposition to Israeli government policies from positions that Jewish organizations regard as discriminatory toward Jews. ‘Our community called racism by its name’ Ashley Hirst, who proposed the Board of Deputies resolution, framed the issue as a fundamental question of Jewish identity and historical continuity.

"I inherited 3,000 years of stories, language, memory and everyday traditions that connect me to Zion," Hirst said. He welcomed what he described as the unequivocal message from British Jews that a political party declaring that connection racist should itself be regarded as racist. Max Royston, who seconded the proposal, said the vote sent a clear message about the direction of the Green Party under its current leadership. "Zionism is the belief that Jews have the right to national self-determination in our homeland," Royston said.

"Denying that right to Jews alone is racism." He said the Board's overwhelming decision demonstrated the seriousness with which its members viewed the Green Party's position and concluded that the Jewish community had now publicly identified what it considered racism.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Ynet reports the Board of Deputies vote fairly on its basic facts and attributes the 'racist' charge to the Board. It never gives the Green motion's own definition of Zionism, so readers see only the Board's definition. It also rewrites the Green Party's reply so that the word genocide disappears.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    Ynet never quotes how the Green motion defines Zionism. The motion calls it an ideology advocating 'an ethnonationalist Jewish state in historic Palestine to the exclusion and/ or domination of the non-Jewish population', one that 'privileges one ethnic group on the basis of the subjugation of others'. The only definition of Zionism in the article is the Board's: national self-determination and a connection to Zion. A reader comes away believing the Greens declared Jewish identity or connection to Israel racist, when the motion's text defines the target as exclusion and domination of non-Jews.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  2. Softens the accused party's reply

    Minor

    “against Israeli government policies in Gaza”

    Why this matters
    Ynet paraphrases the Green spokesperson's reply as campaigning 'against Israeli government policies in Gaza'.
    The impression it gives
    The Greens' only stated ground is disagreement with Israeli government policy, a mild position that leaves the Board's charge looking stronger.
    The context
    The spokesperson said the Board's charge 'will not stop us from speaking out against the genocide in Gaza and pushing for stronger sanctions against the Israeli government and its leaders'. A UN Commission of Inquiry has found that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Ynet's paraphrase removes the word genocide and the call for sanctions from the one reply the accused party gets.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    Ynet says only that the Board will treat the Greens as it treats other parties it considers racist. It does not say what that means in practice. The Board's motion urged other parties not to make deals with the Greens unless they rejected the policy.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)