Daily Mirror, on Climate, 27 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

492ft wind turbines from David Hockney beauty spot

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Campaigners have blocked six giant wind turbines after arguing they would ruin a countryside beauty spot once painted by David Hockney . The 492ft-high structures would have loomed over the rolling Yorkshire Wolds landscape - which inspired some of the late artist's most celebrated paintings. Developers had argued that the scheme would produce enough renewable electricity to power roughly 24,000 households each year. But planning chiefs have now thrown out the scheme, saying it would threaten historic landmarks, villagers' homes and even military radar.

Rob Booth, 58, a resident and member of campaign group Keep Wind Off Woldgate, said: "We are all so relieved - the phones in the village were alive when we heard the decision. "We did so much work to raise our concerns about this wholly inappropriate development, so it's a very welcome decision - but it's still not properly sunk in yet!" East Riding of Yorkshire Council refused the application by Three Oaks REP Extension Ltd on Monday.

The proposals would have seen six turbines built at Thornholme Fields, near Burton Agnes in East Yorkshire. A 300ft-high meteorological mast, underground cables, transformer kiosks, crane pads and access tracks were also included in the plans But in a report giving five reasons for its refusal, council planners warned the development would cause "a high level of harm" to some of the area's most treasured landmarks. These included Burton Agnes Hall, its Grade I-listed gatehouse, All Saints Church in Rudston and the ancient Rudston Monolith.

Rob said: "The field that would have hosted the wind farm bordered Woldgate, an ancient lane made famous by David Hockney who painted it many times when he lived here. "I think he would be very relieved - like us - that the plans are not going ahead. "It's a really special little area and the windfarm would have blighted it for generations to come." Residents feared the structures would transform a landscape made famous worldwide by Hockney.

The Bradford-born painter, who died in June aged 88 , regularly travelled along Woldgate to his studio in Bridlington, drawing inspiration from its woods and fields. He painted the area repeatedly, including in his acclaimed 2011 iPad series The Arrival of Spring, created over six months. One of his Woldgate Woods works sold for £9.4million in New York in 2016. Mr Hockney himself had opposed wind turbines in the area, describing them as "big ugly things".

He said: "I certainly wouldn't paint them. They are unnatural. People should stand up for themselves and say no to these things if they don't agree with them." A spokesperson for developer Three Oaks REP Extension Ltd said it is "disappointed" by the decision, adding: "There is an urgent need to accelerate the delivery of renewable energy infrastructure, and decisions such as this risk slowing progress towards a low-carbon energy system, greater energy security, and lower energy costs.

"Since 2014, the case for homegrown energy, national investment and meaningful community benefits has only grown stronger. These principles are at the heart of our approach to the Three Oaks Extension. "We recognise that infrastructure projects can have local impacts, which must be carefully considered and balanced against the wider need for clean, secure, and affordable British energy." The developer said it will consider the council's decision "before determining our next steps".

Read the original article on mirror.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Mirror reports East Riding of Yorkshire Council's refusal of six wind turbines near the Yorkshire Wolds landscape painted by David Hockney. Its headline and opening line credit campaigners with blocking the scheme, when its own body says council planners refused it on heritage, residential and radar grounds. Otherwise the report gives the developer's case and the council's reasons with clear attribution.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Campaigners block”

    Why this matters
    The headline says campaigners blocked the turbines, making the campaign group the actor behind the decision.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the campaigners themselves stopped the scheme, or that the outcome turned on their Hockney argument.
    The context
    The body says the council's planners refused the application, giving five reasons covering historic landmarks, villagers' homes and military radar. The campaigners objected, but the decision was the council's.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“East Riding of Yorkshire Council refused the application”
    • Elsewhere in the article“planning chiefs have now thrown out the scheme”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “saying it would threaten historic landmarks, villagers' homes and even military radar”

    It states the council's actual grounds for refusal rather than leaving the decision to the campaigners' framing alone.

  • “Developers had argued that the scheme would produce enough renewable electricity to power roughly 24,000 households each year”

    It gives the reader what the scheme would have delivered, clearly attributed to the developer.

  • “There is an urgent need to accelerate the delivery of renewable energy infrastructure”

    It quotes the developer's case for clean energy at length, so the cost of refusal is set out alongside the objections.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mirror

  1. 27 OctCyclone Arnab - live: India evacuates tens of thousands as 'very severe' storm approaches6.0
  2. 27 OctFirst picture of 'loving family man', 29, killed when tree crushed his car in Storm Boelo3.0
  3. 27 OctBudget 2026 predictions - from state pension and tax to energy bills0.0
  4. 27 OctPrince William lines up Take That for historic performance at Earthshot Prize Awards0.0
  5. 26 OctTop Labour donor calls on government to 'go the whole hog' in energy bill reform to save households £400 a year3.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mirror