The New York Times, on Gaza, 9 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Israel Denounces the Decision to Award the Nobel Peace Prize to Navi Pillay

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu led Israel’s denunciations on Friday of the decision to award the Nobel Peace Prize to Navi Pillay, a human rights lawyer who was drawn into the international spotlight last year when a United Nations commission she chaired found that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. In a statement, Mr. Netanyahu called the decision by the Norwegian Nobel Committee misguided and said it had “lost its moral compass.”

He also condemned Ms. Pillay’s work, accusing her of being prejudiced against Jews. The Israeli foreign ministry, in a post on social media , denounced it as “the grotesque weaponization of an award to legitimize anti-Israel hatred and prejudice.” Danny Danon, Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, also questioned the integrity of the award. Honoring Ms. Pillay with the prize, he said through a spokesman, would damage “the credibility of the Nobel Committee,” and “tarnish the legacy of the distinguished laureates who have received this honor throughout history.

Left out here: One side gets the space

The article reports Netanyahu accusing Ms. Pillay of being prejudiced against Jews but never says she has repeatedly rebuffed critics who made that accusation. A reader of this section meets the charge with no answer from the person it targets.

How we know

Winning the Nobel Prize will not make her false conclusions about Israel any more truthful.” While the prize’s announcement included only a brief mention of her work on the commission’s investigation into the war in Gaza, Jorgen Watne Frydnes, the chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, said the work had played an important part in the decision. The September 2025 finding by the panel, the U.N. Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, is among its most sweeping about the Israeli government’s conduct in the war and drew fierce criticism from Israel.

The commission’s report said that some of Israel’s most senior leaders had “incited the commission of genocide.” We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber?

Log in . Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The New York Times reports Israel's denunciations of Navi Pillay's Nobel Peace Prize, attributing every charge to the person who made it, and states the UN commission's genocide finding plainly in its own voice. The one gap is minor: the article reports Mr. Netanyahu's charge that Ms. Pillay is prejudiced against Jews without saying that she has repeatedly rebuffed that accusation. The text available ends at a paywall, so later passages could not be read.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article reports Netanyahu accusing Ms. Pillay of being prejudiced against Jews but never says she has repeatedly rebuffed critics who made that accusation. A reader of this section meets the charge with no answer from the person it targets.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “a United Nations commission she chaired found that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza”

    The Times states the commission's finding of genocide as what it is, a finding, in its own voice, with no 'alleged' or 'accused' attached.

  • “The commission’s report said that some of Israel’s most senior leaders had “incited the commission of genocide.””

    The article quotes the report's own words on incitement by senior Israeli leaders rather than leaving Israel's denunciations as the only account of the finding.

  • “accusing her of being prejudiced against Jews”

    The grave charge against a named person is clearly attributed to Netanyahu as an accusation, not stated as fact in the outlet's voice.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

Everything we scored from The New York Times

See how 241 outlets covered this story