The New York Times, on Climate, 26 October 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Shiny Glass Skyscrapers Are a Hot Thing. Literally.

No framing issues found.

One thousand feet above city traffic, from her new 74th-floor apartment, Anastasia Zeeman has the kind of enchanting views that only floor-to-ceiling glass can offer. She looks out on a skyline and horizon where storms and sunsets play out like big-screen movies. But Malaysia’s tropical sun sometimes delivers what Ms. Zeeman calls a “wall of heat” radiating from her windows. More than any other form of architecture, glass skyscrapers testify to the human desire for sweeping views and a sense of rising above the fray.

In some of the world’s fastest developing places — Dubai, Mumbai, Jakarta, Kuala Lumpur — they have become city-defining showpieces, signaling sophistication and rising financial clout. And yet glass tends to be ill-suited for keeping out the heat, and its overuse often makes buildings more energy intensive to cool. That’s fueling a debate about whether these symbols of modernity make sense in a world growing hotter because of climate change.

Some argue that the ambition and innovation that spawned the high-rise era can help modern skyscrapers fend off rising temperatures while maintaining the million-dollar views. Others say the all-glass aesthetic is at odds with the environmental goal of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions. They say it is time to rethink city skylines. We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in . Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The New York Times reports that glass skyscrapers, popular in fast-growing hot cities, let in heat and need more energy to cool, and it sets out a debate over whether they suit a warming world. Only the opening of the article came through, but nothing in that text misleads. The Times states plainly that the world is growing hotter because of climate change.

What it gets right

  • “a world growing hotter because of climate change”

    The Times states the warming and its cause as fact in its own voice, with no hedge such as "scientists say".

  • “its overuse often makes buildings more energy intensive to cool”

    The Times names the concrete cost of the design choice, the extra energy needed for cooling, rather than leaving the problem as one of comfort.

  • “at odds with the environmental goal of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions”

    The Times ties the debate to emissions, so a reader sees why building design matters for the climate and not only for residents.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

  1. 27 OctIndia Evacuates Tens of Thousands as Cyclone Arnab Approaches6.0
  2. 26 OctThe Storm Wrecked Their Bridges. ‘All That Red Tape’ Left Them Stranded.0.0
  3. 25 OctMaps: Tracking Typhoon In-fa6.0
  4. 24 Oct5 Takeaways From Our Investigation of Trump’s Waivers for Polluters0.0

Everything we scored from The New York Times