The Scotsman, by Andrew J Quinn, on UK Politics, 13 November 2026
We do not republish articles from The Scotsman. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
Read the original article on scotsman.com (opens in a new tab)The Scotsman reports a Labour MP's call for the SNP government to set out a timetable for a school phone ban, ahead of its consultation closing on 17 November. The criticism is attributed to Gregor Poynton throughout. The reporter adds independent context: the government's own commitment to a ban, its August consultation and the fact that no date has yet been set. Nothing in the article misleads its reader.
“Labour MP Gregor Poynton said the SNP should”
The headline's "urged" is pinned to a named politician and his party at once, so the criticism reads as Labour's charge, not as The Scotsman's own verdict.
“confirmed after the election that the Scottish government would bring in a phone ban and launched a consultation in August”
The reporter sets out what the SNP government has actually done. The opposition's complaint does not stand alone as the only account of its record.
“Ministers have not yet specified a date for its introduction or when the new restrictions will take effect.”
The reporter checks the core of the MP's complaint in the outlet's own voice. The claim is confirmed as fact, not merely repeated, and the next sentence notes the government was approached for comment.
Spot something we missed? Report this article