The Scotsman opinion piece, on UK Politics, 31 October 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Douglas Alexander: The next step for devolution is into our regions

No framing issues found.

When Donald Dewar opened Holyrood, he called devolution "not an end: a means to greater ends". Nearly 30 years on, it’s time to take the next step; moving power out from the centre of Holyrood and into Scotland’s regions. It’s this message on further devolution – for London and Edinburgh alike – was what the Prime Minister brought to Glasgow yesterday. We came to the National Economic Council wanting a different approach, not the old politics that too often puts party before place.

Andy’s offer was simple. Scotland’s two governments working together to improve lives right across the country, so that people see and feel real change where they live. I’m glad the First Minister accepted the offer, as did Rhun ap Iorwerth, the First Minister of Wales. It is good news for Scotland. READ MORE: Andy Burnham: I don't want to see Scotland left out of my regional devolution plans And it comes with substance. No10 North will now facilitate a ‘policy sprint’ with the Scottish Government, focused on how each government can contribute to regional economic empowerment and reindustrialisation to deliver good growth in every postcode.

Glasgow, the city where I was born, shows why this matters. It has talent, world-class universities, and ambition to spare. But it could benefit from more power and resources being put in its hands. Young people are leaving because they can’t see a future at home. On too many high streets, the shutters are down. Landmark buildings are sadly burnt out. Those problems won’t be fixed from a desk in Whitehall or St Andrews House. They’ll be fixed by people who know their place, and have the powers and resources to act.

That is what a place first, not party first, approach means. Giving our regions a real say over employability and skills, transport, housing and investment. Of course, there are issues on which we will continue to disagree – independence most obviously. But disagreement on the constitution is no excuse for failing to cooperate on what matters most to families, from Easterhouse to Peterhead. A good job, a decent home, a bus that turns up.

The Prime Minister knows this better than anyone. He isn’t just an advocate of devolution, but a practitioner of it. In Greater Manchester he took real powers over transport, skills and growth, and used them. The result is a city region with a plan, and the clout to deliver it. A couple of weeks ago in Motherwell, he made a sincere and genuine offer to work together. Yesterday, the Scottish Government accepted it. And the timing matters.

South of the border, the train is leaving the station. The regional empowerment agenda is gathering pace in England, and this week’s Budget advanced it. The people of Scotland must not be left behind on the platform. Get our revamped Steamie newsletter Nor is this just a British story. Around the world, city regions are the engines of prosperity. Glasgow, Edinburgh, Aberdeen, Dundee, Inverness, and the regions around them, should be leading that race, not watching it.

Three decades on from Scotland voting for its own parliament, the question is no longer whether power should be devolved, but how far it should travel. Power devolved must be power used, not hoarded. Yesterday was a good start. Now the work begins. Turning an agreement in a Glasgow meeting room into real change on Scotland’s high streets. I can assure you that today and tomorrow the UK Government's focus will be on strengthening Scotland's regions, with the aim of delivering good growth across our nation.

Read the original article on scotsman.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

Douglas Alexander, writing under his own name, argues for devolving power from Holyrood to Scotland's regions and presents the Glasgow National Economic Council meeting as the start of that work. His account of the First Minister accepting the Prime Minister's offer to cooperate matches other reports of the meeting. It is a political argument, and nothing in it misleads the reader on the techniques that apply to opinion.

Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.

What it gets right

  • “there are issues on which we will continue to disagree – independence most obviously”

    Alexander states openly that the two governments remain divided on independence. This matches Swinney's own statement that he and the Prime Minister disagree on independence, as reported by Anadolu Agency, so the column does not overstate the agreement reached in Glasgow.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Scotsman

  1. 31 OctSwinney under fire by UK Defence Secretary for 'irresponsible' remarks over Russian threat0.0
  2. 30 OctAndy Burnham: I don't want to see Scotland left out of my regional devolution plans0.0
  3. 30 OctReaders' Letters: New ferry delay makes Flynn's position untenable0.0
  4. 30 OctScottish government wins Salmond files case as court rules Information Commissioner ‘erred in law’3.0
  5. 30 Oct'There's no limit to what John Swinney and I can achieve together', says Andy Burnham0.0

Everything we scored from The Scotsman