Anadolu Agency (English), on Iran, 12 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Iran’s Revolutionary Guard says 2 oil tankers exploded in Strait of Hormuz

No framing issues found.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy said Thursday that two oil tankers exploded in the Strait of Hormuz after “ignoring repeated warnings” against using an “unauthorized” route. In a statement carried by Iran’s ISNA news agency, the IRGC Navy said the two tankers were involved in an incident late Wednesday while “transiting the southern part of the strait, despite repeated warnings from its traffic control center.” The statement described both vessels as supertankers carrying a combined cargo of “more than 4 million barrels of oil,” adding that they had been stopped following “a massive explosion.”

The IRGC Navy accused the vessels of “cooperating with the US military,” referring to it as a “smuggling army,” and warned that “any ship in the Persian Gulf or Strait of Hormuz that switches off its navigation systems and cooperates with US forces to cross the southern route would face the same fate.” The statement did not identify the vessels or provide further details about the incident. The developments come amid continued tensions between Iran and the US over navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important strategic routes for energy and commodity supplies and a key issue in negotiations between the two sides.

The war began with US and Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, before a ceasefire was reached in April. Clashes between Washington and Tehran later resumed as negotiations stalled despite the two sides signing a memorandum of understanding in June.

Read the original article on aa.com.tr (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

Anadolu reports an IRGC Navy statement that two oil tankers exploded in the Strait of Hormuz after using a route the IRGC calls unauthorised. The claims about the incident, including the accusation of cooperation with US forces, are attributed to the IRGC, and the article says plainly what the statement did not establish. In its own voice, Anadolu names US and Israeli attacks on Iran as the start of the war.

What it gets right

  • “The war began with US and Israeli attacks on Iran”

    Anadolu names who started the war in its own voice. It does not leave the reader with an agentless conflict that simply erupted.

  • “The statement did not identify the vessels or provide further details about the incident.”

    Anadolu tells the reader what the IRGC's claim leaves unverified, rather than letting the statement stand as established fact.

  • “The IRGC Navy accused the vessels of “cooperating with the US military,””

    The accusation is marked as an accusation and attributed to the IRGC Navy. It is not stated as fact in Anadolu's voice.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Anadolu Agency (English)

  1. 13 NovCENTCOM calls Israeli media report of possible Iran war resumption ‘pure speculation’0.0
  2. 13 NovTrump says he may use force against Iran 'right now' if US allies and ships are threatened3.0
  3. 12 NovIran says 2 oil tankers caught fire after hitting naval mines near Strait of Hormuz0.0
  4. 12 NovTrump says US 'doesn't need' deal with Iran, claims control of Strait of Hormuz6.0
  5. 12 Nov‘No safe haven’: Iran warns military bases in Europe could be targeted in new US war0.0

Everything we scored from Anadolu Agency (English)