The Spectator opinion piece, by Andrew Gilligan, on UK Politics, 18 August 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Cambridge University-linked project erases Israel

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

An academic project hosted by Cambridge University promotes an “Islamic curriculum” which tells 12-year-olds that Hamas is an “excuse that Israel uses to justify its attacks on the Gaza Strip,” calls “prisoners of war” and publishes in pupils’ course material a map of the region from which Israel has been erased. The project also publishes a guide aimed at parents and children , written after the attacks, which asks: “What is the reward of a shaheed [a martyr]?

How does this make you feel when you think of all the children of Gaza who are now shuhada [martyrs]?” and states, quoting the Quran: “Never say that those martyred in the cause of Allah are dead – in fact, they are alive but you do not perceive it.” “Hamas is the biggest excuse that Israel uses to justify its attacks on the Gaza Strip,” the ICI tells the children The project which promotes the claims, the Islamic Educator Learning Community (IELC), is led by Cambridge’s assistant research professor of education , Farah Ahmed, a member of the same faculty which employed Jason Arday and a former activist in the now-banned terror group Hizb ut-Tahrir.

This article marks the third in our continuing series about the deep problems in the subject of Education at Cambridge. It follows our disclosure of on Tuesday and our revelation on Saturday that Ahmed’s unit has also promoted support for creationism and attacks on evolution. Ahmed’s IELC is “ hosted by ” and “ partners with ” a university body called the Cambridge Teacher Research Exchange, Camtree.

Camtree is a project of Hughes Hall , the Cambridge University college where Ahmed is a governing fellow . Ahmed is also an “ affiliate ” of Camtree. Most popular IELC’s website promotes something called the “Islamic Curriculum Initiative,” describing it as a response of Muslim educators to the 7 October attacks. As IELC puts it : “We know that silence, neutrality, and business-as-usual in education are no longer options. The events following October 7 made that painfully clear.

What we see today is not new: it is the continuation of a colonial legacy, now repackaged in modern forms, and it demands a clear, principled response from educators.” For its own part, the Islamic Curriculum Initiative (ICI) says that “Palestine is not just a cause – it is a litmus test of our moral clarity, a reflection of our connection to faith, justice, and the Ummah…Our curriculum places Palestine where it belongs: at the heart of how students understand justice, faith, and responsibility…making Palestine not a footnote, but a formative part of identity.”

ICI attacks how “the events following October 7 further exposed the manipulation of narratives and the deep-rooted injustice in global discourse. The aftershocks of colonialism continue to shape education and culture, often stripping students of moral clarity and connection. ICI is working to respond with curricula that restore truth.” Alas, ICI’s truth includes a number of things which are not true. In a slide deck for students , it publishes a “political map” of the region from which Israel has been erased, showing Palestine as taking up the whole of the UN-recognised, pre-1967 territory of Israel.

Another item, the lesson plan for “symbols of Palestine” curriculum – aimed at four to eight year olds – says they should be taught to “display the full map of Palestine and discuss how it represents the entirety of the land.” As ICI puts it: “The Zionist narrative tries to claim that Jews are the indigenous people of Palestine and that they are just returning to their ancestral homeland. The Canaanites were the indigenous inhabitants of Palestine, establishing civilizations there over 5,000 years ago.”

Even if it were not widely agreed that the Jews descend from the Canaanites, a distinctly Jewish population emerged in Palestine more than 3,000 years ago. ICI tells children it is wrong that the term anti-Semitism should be “used exclusively for prejudice against Jews.” Jews’ claim to be Semitic is “unsound” because “most Jews lived outside Palestine for 1,900+ years” and “many modern Jews are not from the region.” ICI also has a course – aimed at 12-14 year olds – on the “Nakba,” catastrophe, as Palestinians call the creation of Israel.

In this, it describes the Hamas attacks on October 7 2023 as part of Palestinians’ “great march of return.” It says of the hostages taken by Hamas on that day, most of them non-combatant civilians: “During the attack, more than 200 Israelis were captured as prisoners of war.” Hamas itself? “Hamas is the biggest excuse that Israel uses to justify its attacks on the Gaza Strip,” the ICI tells the children. There’s plenty more to come about Farah Ahmed and the things her unit promotes.

I wonder how many stories it will take before Cambridge University does something about her.

Read the original article on spectator.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Spectator says in its own voice that a named academic, Farah Ahmed, has a long record of bigoted, extremist and separatist views, and this article backs that with nothing she has said or written. It also calls all the 7 October hostages civilians, though it later says most of them were.

NewsCord staff selected this article for review and pointed the model at passages to examine. Every finding quotes the article.

Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.

  1. Smears a named person

    Serious

    “Ahmed’s long record of bigoted, extremist and separatist views”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet says that Ahmed, a named academic, holds a long record of "bigoted, extremist and separatist views". It states this as settled fact.
    The impression it gives
    That Ahmed is an established bigot and extremist, and that this has been proven.
    The context
    The article quotes nothing Ahmed herself has said or written. Every quotation in the piece comes from the IELC or the Islamic Curriculum Initiative, not from her. The charge rests only on a pointer to an earlier article, so this piece gives the reader nothing to support a grave allegation against a named person.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Earlier this week we reported on views Ahmed has expressed. Readers can judge them in that article.

  2. Makes a false claim

    Minor

    “the civilian hostages taken by the terror group on October 7”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls all the hostages civilians.
    The impression it gives
    That every hostage taken on 7 October was a civilian, so the curriculum's "prisoners of war" wording has no basis at all.
    The context
    The article itself later says the hostages were "most of them non-combatant civilians". By its own account, some were not civilians.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“most of them non-combatant civilians”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Spectator

  1. 7 SeptThe proof that Cambridge’s Jason Arday inquiry will be a whitewash3.0
  2. 26 AugMiddle East Eye seems to get stupider and stupider6.0
  3. 25 AugFarah Ahmed: study engineering ‘to produce weaponry for Jihad’3.0
  4. 15 AugWhy is Cambridge platforming Islamic creationism?3.0
  5. 11 AugMeet Farah Ahmed, Jason Arday’s colleague3.0

Everything we scored from The Spectator