We do not republish articles from The Independent. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
The Independent reports Trump's remarks that the US will hold off on new strikes on Iran after the midterm defeat, and gives Iranian, Qatari and US officials a voice. Its headline and opening line turn Trump's words that Iran is militarily 'effectively over' into a claim that the war itself is over, while the body reports ongoing attacks and Trump's own warning that the US may 'go back in'. Otherwise the article names who started the war and attributes contested claims.
Headline goes beyond the article
Minor
“Trump says Iran war is ‘effectively over’”
Why this matters
The headline attaches Trump's quoted words 'effectively over' to 'Iran war', so the reader takes it that Trump announced the end of the war.
The impression it gives
That Trump said the war on Iran has ended.
The context
Trump's words were 'Iran, militarily, is effectively over', a claim about Iran's military state, not the war. In the same remarks he said 'if we do have to go back in, we are locked and loaded', and the article itself reports that attacks between the two sides are ongoing and the naval blockade stays in place.
How we know
Elsewhere in the article“Iran, militarily, is effectively over.”
Elsewhere in the article“Attacks between the two sides are ongoing”
Elsewhere in the article“if we do have to go back in, we are locked and loaded”